Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Started working for scenario tests for CuberitePluginChecker #109

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Aug 4, 2024
Merged

Conversation

NiLSPACE
Copy link
Member

With this PR WorldEdit works without any problems in the CuberitePluginChecker.



function Initialize(a_Plugin)
PLUGIN = a_Plugin
PLUGIN:SetName(g_PluginInfo.Name)
PLUGIN:SetVersion(g_PluginInfo.Version)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I suppose we should make an exception in the Checker to allow this one specific case.

Copy link
Member Author

@NiLSPACE NiLSPACE Oct 26, 2016

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, probably, but I was planning on removing it here anyway. I find it to be quite ugly.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Exception added. But yes, this kind of code is ugly, especially all-caps variable names.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should cWorld also be an exception? Technically they can be stored right? Since we do have the cRoot:GetWorld method.

@NiLSPACE
Copy link
Member Author

NiLSPACE commented Jun 8, 2017

Do you mind if I merge this?

@madmaxoft
Copy link
Member

Sure, go ahead, you're the main WE man, after all :)

@madmaxoft
Copy link
Member

Although, I think you should first connect the CIs, test this PR and only merge after success.

@NiLSPACE NiLSPACE merged commit 72ab743 into master Aug 4, 2024
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants