Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

crossbeam-skiplist: allows lookup to be customized. #1132

Merged
merged 13 commits into from
Dec 9, 2024

Conversation

al8n
Copy link
Contributor

@al8n al8n commented Sep 4, 2024

Hi, this PR solves #1133, which changes the lookup API from

where
  K: Borrow<Q>,
  Q: ?Sized + Ord,

to

where
  Q: ?Sized + Ord + equivalent::Comparable<K>,

The equivalent is the crate used by indexmap.

I would like to suggest this change because when using SkipMap, I find the lookup API are limited by Borrow trait. e.g., with Borrow trait, this example cannot be implemented as we cannot implement impl<'a> core::borrow::Borrow<FooRef<'a>> for Foo because of Rust's rule.

#[derive(PartialEq, Eq, PartialOrd, Ord)]
struct Foo {
    a: u64,
    b: u32,
}

#[derive(PartialEq, Eq)]
struct FooRef<'a> {
    data: &'a [u8],
}

impl PartialOrd for FooRef<'_> {
    fn partial_cmp(&self, other: &Self) -> Option<std::cmp::Ordering> {
        Some(self.cmp(other))
    }
}

impl Ord for FooRef<'_> {
    fn cmp(&self, other: &Self) -> std::cmp::Ordering {
        let a = u64::from_be_bytes(self.data[..8].try_into().unwrap());
        let b = u32::from_be_bytes(self.data[8..].try_into().unwrap());
        let other_a = u64::from_be_bytes(other.data[..8].try_into().unwrap());
        let other_b = u32::from_be_bytes(other.data[8..].try_into().unwrap());
        Foo { a, b }.cmp(&Foo {
            a: other_a,
            b: other_b,
        })
    }
}

impl<'a> core::borrow::Borrow<FooRef<'a>> for Foo {
    fn borrow(&self) -> &FooRef<'a> {
        // we cannot return a reference to a local variable
        todo!()
    }
}

fn lookup() {
    let s = SkipMap::new();
    let foo = Foo { a: 1, b: 2 };
    s.insert(foo, 12);

    let buf = 1u64
        .to_be_bytes()
        .iter()
        .chain(2u32.to_be_bytes().iter())
        .copied()
        .collect::<Vec<_>>();

    let foo_ref = FooRef { data: &buf };
    let ent = s.get(&foo_ref).unwrap();
    assert_eq!(ent.key().a, 1);
    assert_eq!(ent.key().b, 2);
    assert_eq!(*ent.value(), 12);
}

After change to Q: ?Sized + Ord + Comparable<K>, just like how indexmap do in its lookup API, the above example can be implemented.

use equivalent::{Comparable, Equivalent};

#[derive(PartialEq, Eq, PartialOrd, Ord)]
struct Foo {
    a: u64,
    b: u32,
}

#[derive(PartialEq, Eq)]
struct FooRef<'a> {
    data: &'a [u8],
}

impl PartialOrd for FooRef<'_> {
    fn partial_cmp(&self, other: &Self) -> Option<std::cmp::Ordering> {
        Some(self.cmp(other))
    }
}

impl Ord for FooRef<'_> {
    fn cmp(&self, other: &Self) -> std::cmp::Ordering {
        let a = u64::from_be_bytes(self.data[..8].try_into().unwrap());
        let b = u32::from_be_bytes(self.data[8..].try_into().unwrap());
        let other_a = u64::from_be_bytes(other.data[..8].try_into().unwrap());
        let other_b = u32::from_be_bytes(other.data[8..].try_into().unwrap());
        Foo { a, b }.cmp(&Foo {
            a: other_a,
            b: other_b,
        })
    }
}

impl Equivalent<Foo> for FooRef<'_> {
    fn equivalent(&self, key: &Foo) -> bool {
        let a = u64::from_be_bytes(self.data[..8].try_into().unwrap());
        let b = u32::from_be_bytes(self.data[8..].try_into().unwrap());
        a == key.a && b == key.b
    }
}

impl Comparable<Foo> for FooRef<'_> {
    fn compare(&self, key: &Foo) -> std::cmp::Ordering {
        let a = u64::from_be_bytes(self.data[..8].try_into().unwrap());
        let b = u32::from_be_bytes(self.data[8..].try_into().unwrap());
        Foo { a, b }.cmp(key)
    }
}

fn lookup() {
    let s = SkipMap::new();
    let foo = Foo { a: 1, b: 2 };

    s.insert(foo, 12);

    let buf = 1u64
        .to_be_bytes()
        .iter()
        .chain(2u32.to_be_bytes().iter())
        .copied()
        .collect::<Vec<_>>();
    let foo_ref = FooRef { data: &buf };

    let ent = s.get(&foo_ref).unwrap();
    assert_eq!(ent.key().a, 1);
    assert_eq!(ent.key().b, 2);
    assert_eq!(*ent.value(), 12);
}

This feature is quite important when using some zero-copy deserialization frameworks like rkyv's types with SkipMap to avoid the allocation.

Closes #1133

@marvin-j97
Copy link

marvin-j97 commented Oct 9, 2024

I ran across this recently too, unfortunately the skiplist sits in my hot path, so the allocation is unfortunate. Using this PR increased performance by like 10% (for the entire read path, of which the skiplist is only a part of):

Before

Screenshot from 2024-10-09 21-36-40

You can see that most of the time stems from allocating and drop_in_place of the Key Arc...

After

Screenshot from 2024-10-09 21-36-14

@al8n Very nice change!

@marvin-j97
Copy link

Is there anything that can be done to move this forward? I guess this could be a breaking change, but crossbeam is < 1.0 anyway - I've been thinking of forking crossbeam-skiplist, just so I can get this change into my code base...

crossbeam-skiplist/Cargo.toml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
crossbeam-skiplist/tests/map.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@taiki-e
Copy link
Member

taiki-e commented Dec 4, 2024

Thank for the PR.

To be honest, I suspect that the “efficiency” issue here can actually be resolved in some cases by using the appropriate key wrappers...

@al8n al8n requested a review from taiki-e December 5, 2024 01:11
@al8n
Copy link
Contributor Author

al8n commented Dec 7, 2024

Is there anything that can be done to move this forward? I guess this could be a breaking change, but crossbeam is < 1.0 anyway - I've been thinking of forking crossbeam-skiplist, just so I can get this change into my code base...

I have already published a forked version crossbeam-skiplist-pr1132 to the crates.io for tmp solution, this may help your case.

@taiki-e
Copy link
Member

taiki-e commented Dec 8, 2024

It seems that @cuviper has tried something similar to this before (indexmap-rs/indexmap#253 (comment)). The approach there does not seem to have type inference issues unlike this PR? (or am I missed something?)

@al8n
Copy link
Contributor Author

al8n commented Dec 9, 2024

It seems that @cuviper has tried something similar to this before (indexmap-rs/indexmap#253 (comment)). The approach there does not seem to have type inference issues unlike this PR? (or am I missed something?)

I finished the changes about flipping K and Q, now we do not need turbofish anymore. The only problem is that we cannot use the equivalent crate directly(In the current equivalent crate, K and Q are not flipped), I have to add Comparable and Equivalent in lib.rs.

@taiki-e
Copy link
Member

taiki-e commented Dec 9, 2024

@al8n
Copy link
Contributor Author

al8n commented Dec 9, 2024

@al8n al8n requested a review from taiki-e December 9, 2024 12:43
@al8n al8n requested a review from taiki-e December 9, 2024 13:42
Copy link
Member

@taiki-e taiki-e left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

@al8n
Copy link
Contributor Author

al8n commented Dec 9, 2024

LGTM.

Could I merge this PR?

@taiki-e
Copy link
Member

taiki-e commented Dec 9, 2024

The first version of this PR was a breaking change because it required turbofish in some places, but I guess the current version will actually not cause the breakage that would be considered a breaking change.

@taiki-e taiki-e merged commit 45425b0 into crossbeam-rs:master Dec 9, 2024
25 checks passed
@marvin-j97
Copy link

@taiki-e Can this change be published (possibly as pre-release) to crates?

@taiki-e
Copy link
Member

taiki-e commented Dec 14, 2024

New release is blocked by what to do with #1158.

@marvin-j97
Copy link

New release is blocked by what to do with #1158.

That doesn't seem to change the API though, seems more like a refactor to me.

@taiki-e
Copy link
Member

taiki-e commented Dec 14, 2024

I think such a change is a breaking change when done after this change is released. See tokio-rs/bytes#479 (comment) for more.

@al8n
Copy link
Contributor Author

al8n commented Dec 14, 2024

I think such a change is a breaking change when done after this change is released. See tokio-rs/bytes#479 (comment) for more.

Actually, I am fine with keeping Comparable and Equivalent in the crossbeam-skiplist, if compatibility is important, I can close #1158.

I will also give a look how indexmap plays with equivalent crate.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

feat(skiplist): allows lookup to be customized.
3 participants