Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix broken docs #230

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jan 2, 2025
Merged

Fix broken docs #230

merged 5 commits into from
Jan 2, 2025

Conversation

anxolin
Copy link
Contributor

@anxolin anxolin commented Jan 2, 2025

The link breaks the docs

image

This fix has been tested. Uses absolute path, which is not ideal but works. I will merge this to fix the docs. We might want to reiterate.

Maybe one better solution is to move the trading SDK docs to the official documentation

@anxolin anxolin requested a review from a team January 2, 2025 19:16
@anxolin anxolin merged commit c379396 into main Jan 2, 2025
8 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 2, 2025
@coveralls
Copy link
Collaborator

Coverage Status

coverage: 78.378%. remained the same
when pulling 2e7b7b3 on fix-broken-docs
into 6d77cfe on main.

@alfetopito alfetopito deleted the fix-broken-docs branch January 6, 2025 13:30
@@ -60,6 +61,7 @@
"@typescript-eslint/parser": "^5.51.0",
"babel-plugin-inline-import": "^3.0.0",
"coveralls": "^3.1.1",
"cpx": "^1.5.0",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why cpx rather than pure cp?
AFACIT, cpx would be useful for watching file changes, but that's not needed here.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants