docs: add changelog for v4.5.0 release #2314
Conversation
📝 Walkthrough📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe changes in version 4.5.0 primarily focus on enhancing the handling of IBC transfer packets related to ICS rewards. The memo field in these packets is now populated with the consumer chain ID, improving the identification of the consumer by the provider. Additionally, a bug fix has been implemented to eliminate duplicate event emissions on cached context. These modifications are categorized as state-breaking changes, indicating potential impacts on existing functionality. Changes
Possibly related issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
.changelog/v4.5.0/features/2290-add-memo-to-ICS-rewards.md (1)
Line range hint
1-5: LGTM with minor suggestions for improvementThe changelog entry effectively communicates the new features related to ICS rewards in version 4.5.0. The information is clear and concise, covering both consumer and provider changes. However, I have a few minor suggestions to enhance clarity and consistency:
- Consider capitalizing "Id" to "ID" in "consumer chain Id" for consistency with common abbreviation practices.
- The term "ICS rewards" might not be immediately clear to all readers. Consider expanding it to "Interchain Security rewards" on first use.
- The formatting of the GitHub issue link could be improved for better readability.
Here's a suggested revision with these improvements:
- `[x/consumer]` Populate the memo on the IBC transfer packets used to send Interchain Security (ICS) rewards with the required consumer chain ID to identify the consumer to the provider. - `[x/provider]` Identify the source of ICS rewards from the IBC transfer packet memo. ([#2290](https://github.com/cosmos/interchain-security/pull/2290)).changelog/v4.5.0/state-breaking/2290-add-memo-to-ICS-rewards.md (1)
1-4: LGTM! The changelog entry is clear and informative.The changes to both the consumer and provider modules regarding ICS rewards are well-documented. The addition of the consumer chain ID to the memo field in IBC transfer packets will indeed improve the identification and traceability of rewards.
Consider adding a brief explanation of why this change was necessary or what problem it solves. This could provide more context for users reading the changelog. For example:
- `[x/consumer]` Populate the memo on the IBC transfer packets used to send ICS rewards -with the required consumer chain Id to identify the consumer to the provider. +with the required consumer chain ID to identify the consumer to the provider. +This change improves the accuracy of reward attribution in multi-chain setups. - `[x/provider]` Identify the source of ICS rewards from the IBC transfer packet memo. +This allows for better tracking and verification of incoming rewards. ([\#2290](https://github.com/cosmos/interchain-security/pull/2290))Also, note the capitalization change from "Id" to "ID" for consistency with common abbreviation standards.
CHANGELOG.md (2)
12-17: LGTM: Features section is informative and well-structuredThe feature descriptions are clear and provide good context. The GitHub pull request reference is correctly formatted.
Consider adding a brief explanation of what ICS stands for (Interchain Security) for clarity, as it might not be immediately obvious to all readers.
19-24: LGTM: State breaking section correctly identifies impactful changesThe state breaking changes are correctly identified and match the features mentioned earlier.
Consider adding a brief explanation of why these changes are state-breaking. This would provide more context for users and developers about the impact of upgrading to this version.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
- .changelog/v4.5.0/features/2290-add-memo-to-ICS-rewards.md (1 hunks)
- .changelog/v4.5.0/state-breaking/2290-add-memo-to-ICS-rewards.md (1 hunks)
- .changelog/v4.5.0/summary.md (1 hunks)
- CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- .changelog/v4.5.0/summary.md
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
CHANGELOG.md (1)
Pattern
**/*.md: "Assess the documentation for misspellings, grammatical errors, missing documentation and correctness. Please DO NOT report any missing or superfluous newlines, in particular at the end or beginning of files. Only report issues that you have a high degree of confidence in."
🔇 Additional comments (3)
CHANGELOG.md (3)
3-5: Verify the release dateThe release date is set to September 30, 2024, which is in the future. Please confirm if this is intentional or if it should be updated to the actual release date.
7-10: LGTM: Bug fixes section is clear and well-formattedThe bug fix is clearly described, and the GitHub pull request reference is correctly formatted.
3-24: Overall, the changelog is well-structured and informativeThe changelog for version 4.5.0 is clear, concise, and follows a consistent format. It effectively communicates the bug fixes, new features, and state-breaking changes. The inclusion of GitHub pull request references enhances traceability.
A few minor suggestions have been made to improve clarity and provide more context. These include verifying the release date, explaining the ICS acronym, and providing more details on why certain changes are state-breaking.
Great job on maintaining a comprehensive changelog!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
RELEASE_NOTES.md (3)
5-9: LGTM with a minor formatting suggestion.The changelog and upgrading guide links are correctly updated to reflect the new version. This information is valuable for users migrating from the previous version.
Consider adding a blank line before the "Changelog" heading to improve readability and conform to Markdown best practices:
# Replicated Security v4.5.0 Release Notes ❗ ***Note this release is ONLY relevant to consumers*** + ## 📝 Changelog🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint
5-5: Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Below
Headings should be surrounded by blank lines(MD022, blanks-around-headings)
11-15: LGTM with a minor formatting suggestion.The highlights section effectively communicates the key improvement in this release, specifically the enhancement to the reward distribution logic for PSS. The reference to issue #2290 is helpful for users seeking more detailed information.
Consider adding a blank line before the "Highlights" heading to improve readability and conform to Markdown best practices:
Refer to the [upgrading guide](https://github.com/cosmos/interchain-security/blob/release/v4.5.x/UPGRADING.md) when migrating from `v4.4.x` to `v4.5.x`. + ## 🚀 Highlights🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint
15-15: null
Files should end with a single newline character(MD047, single-trailing-newline)
15-15: Add a newline at the end of the file.To adhere to common best practices and prevent potential issues with certain tools or version control systems, please add a single newline character at the end of the file.
Apply this change to the end of the file:
This release improves the reward distribution logic for PSS by allowing consumer chains to be identified from the IBC transfer packet memo, see [#2290](https://github.com/cosmos/interchain-security/issues/2290) for more details. +🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint
15-15: null
Files should end with a single newline character(MD047, single-trailing-newline)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- RELEASE_NOTES.md (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
RELEASE_NOTES.md (1)
Pattern
**/*.md: "Assess the documentation for misspellings, grammatical errors, missing documentation and correctness. Please DO NOT report any missing or superfluous newlines, in particular at the end or beginning of files. Only report issues that you have a high degree of confidence in."
🪛 Markdownlint
RELEASE_NOTES.md
5-5: Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Below
Headings should be surrounded by blank lines(MD022, blanks-around-headings)
15-15: null
Files should end with a single newline character(MD047, single-trailing-newline)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
RELEASE_NOTES.md (1)
1-3: LGTM: Title and note are clear and informative.The title correctly states the version, and the note for consumers is prominently displayed. The formatting and content are appropriate for this section.
Description
Closes: #XXXX
Author Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.
I have...
docs:prefix in the PR titleReviewers Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.
I have...
docs:prefix in the PR titlemake build-docs)Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Breaking Changes