Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: fix some comments #2029

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 18, 2024
Merged

fix: fix some comments #2029

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 18, 2024

Conversation

cloudclaim
Copy link
Contributor

@cloudclaim cloudclaim commented Jul 12, 2024

Please go to the Preview tab and select the appropriate sub-template:

  • Production code - for types fix, feat, and refactor.
  • Docs - for documentation changes.
  • Others - for changes that do not affect production code.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Corrected typos in adr-017-allowing-inactive-validators.md and tests/mbt/model/README.md for improved clarity.

Signed-off-by: cloudclaim <[email protected]>
@cloudclaim cloudclaim requested a review from a team as a code owner July 12, 2024 14:29
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 12, 2024

Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The recent changes involve correcting typos in the documentation files to improve clarity and accuracy. One correction is related to filtering out validators in the provider module, and the other corrects the word "arbitrary" in a comment within the test model README.

Changes

Files Change Summary
docs/docs/adrs/...validators.md Corrected a typo related to filtering out validators.
tests/mbt/model/README.md Corrected a typo in the word "arbitrary" for clarity.

Possibly related issues

  • Issue Inactive validators: Update docs #1914: Inactive validators: Update docs
    • These documentation changes might partially address the need to update docs about inactive validators mentioned in this issue.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added C:Testing Assigned automatically by the PR labeler C:Docs Assigned automatically by the PR labeler C:ADR Assigned automatically by the PR labeler labels Jul 12, 2024
@mpoke mpoke enabled auto-merge July 18, 2024 10:00
@mpoke mpoke added this pull request to the merge queue Jul 18, 2024
Merged via the queue into cosmos:main with commit 360a0b0 Jul 18, 2024
16 checks passed
insumity pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 23, 2024
chore: fix some comments

Signed-off-by: cloudclaim <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
C:ADR Assigned automatically by the PR labeler C:Docs Assigned automatically by the PR labeler C:Testing Assigned automatically by the PR labeler
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants