save draft

docs/docs/adrs/adr-018-fault-resolutions.md

@@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
+---
+sidebar_position: 2
+title: ADR Template
+---
+# ADR [018]: [Fault Resolutions (fraud votes)]
+
+## Changelog
+* [date]: [changelog]
+
+## Status
+
+
+Proposed
+
+## Context
+
+Currently, in _PSS_, consumer chains can be secured by a only subset of the provider validator set.
+ That makes them vulnerable to incorrect execution attacks. 
+ These kind misbehaviour of that cannot be handled by the protocol and hence requires a way to submit evidence of such misbehaviour 
+ to the Hub. 
+
+ The ADR proposes a fault resolutions solution that gives the ability to the victims of these attack to prove and slash
+ validators through a governance.
+
+
+
+  from incorrect executions.  Partial Set Security gives the option to consumer chains to be secured by only a subset of the provider validator set.
+
+
+
+
+> This section contains all the context one needs to understand the current state, and why there is a problem. It should be as succinct as possible and introduce the high level idea behind the solution. 
+
+## Decision
+
+> This section explains all of the details of the proposed solution, including implementation details.
+It should also describe affects / corollary items that may need to be changed as a part of this.
+If the proposed change will be large, please also indicate a way to do the change to maximize ease of review.
+(e.g. the optimal split of things to do between separate PR's)
+
+## Consequences
+
+> This section describes the consequences, after applying the decision. All consequences should be summarized here, not just the "positive" ones.
+
+### Positive
+
+### Negative
+
+### Neutral
+
+## References
+
+> Are there any relevant PR comments, issues that led up to this, or articles referenced for why we made the given design choice? If so link them here!
+
+* [references]