Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(contracts): L3+ remove unnecessary CrossMessageValidationOutcome type. #1247

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 2, 2025

Conversation

raulk
Copy link
Contributor

@raulk raulk commented Jan 2, 2025

No description provided.

@raulk raulk requested a review from karlem January 2, 2025 14:54
@raulk raulk requested a review from a team as a code owner January 2, 2025 14:54
@@ -6,7 +6,6 @@ error AlreadyRegisteredSubnet();
error AlreadyInSet();
error CannotConfirmFutureChanges();
error CannotReleaseZero();
error CannotSendCrossMsgToItself();
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Removed redundant and excessively fine-grained error type.

Comment on lines -87 to -88
error CommonParentDoesNotExist();
error UnroutableMessage(string reason);
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Removed redundant and excessively fine-grained error type.

@raulk raulk changed the title chore: L3+: remove unnecessary CrossMessageValidationOutcome type. chore(contracts): L3+: remove unnecessary CrossMessageValidationOutcome type. Jan 2, 2025
@raulk raulk changed the title chore(contracts): L3+: remove unnecessary CrossMessageValidationOutcome type. chore(contracts): L3+ remove unnecessary CrossMessageValidationOutcome type. Jan 2, 2025
@raulk raulk merged commit c3aea65 into support-l2-plus Jan 2, 2025
13 of 15 checks passed
@raulk raulk deleted the raulk/l3-plus-remove-outcome-type branch January 2, 2025 15:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants