Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(quoi-feur): cumulative streak punishment and prevent mute evading #137

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

notAutomne
Copy link

To improve fun:tm: and punish players in the most efficient way, the mute is now an accumulation of how many times "quoi" has been said since the last timeout.
e.g.: An "akhy" spam "quoi" 10 times and didn't get a timeout, then another random try to say "quoi" and got chosen by the "pseudo-randomness": he will be muted for 11 minutes

The second feature is to prevent cheat by muting before displaying "coubeh". Some users just delete their messages before they get muted by the bot.

Marwan ZOGHLAMI and others added 3 commits February 21, 2024 10:07
To improve fun:tm: and punish players in the most efficient way,
the mute is now an accumulation of how many times "quoi" has been
said since the last timeout.
e.g.: An "akhy" spam "quoi" 10 times and didn't get a timeout,
then another random try to say "quoi" and got chosen by the
"pseudo-randomness": he will be muted for 11 minutes

The second feature is to prevent cheat by muting before displaying
"coubeh". Some users just delete their messages before they get
muted by the bot.
To improve fun:tm: and punish players in the most efficient way,
the mute is now an accumulation of how many times "quoi" has been
said since the last timeout.
e.g.: An "akhy" spam "quoi" 10 times and didn't get a timeout,
then another random try to say "quoi" and got chosen by the
"pseudo-randomness": he will be muted for 11 minutes

The second feature is to prevent cheat by muting before displaying
"coubeh". Some users just delete their messages before they get
muted by the bot.
@neolectron
Copy link
Member

neolectron commented Mar 12, 2024

I do like the changes, good proposal.
have you tested it on your end ?

It seems that you have some unsuccessful checks
image

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants