Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: move template log in argoexec to debug loglevel #323

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 22, 2023

Conversation

denis-codefresh
Copy link
Collaborator

Fixes #TODO

Please do not open a pull request until you have checked ALL of these:

  • Create the PR as draft .
  • Run make pre-commit -B to fix codegen and lint problems.
  • Sign-off your commits (otherwise the DCO check will fail).
  • Use a conventional commit message (otherwise the commit message check will fail).
  • "Fixes #" is in both the PR title (for release notes) and this description (to automatically link and close the issue).
  • Add unit or e2e tests. Say how you tested your changes. If you changed the UI, attach screenshots.
  • Github checks are green.
  • Once required tests have passed, mark your PR "Ready for review".

If changes were requested, and you've made them, dismiss the review to get it reviewed again.

@denis-codefresh denis-codefresh changed the title feat: move template lof in argoexec to debug loglevel feat: move template log in argoexec to debug loglevel Dec 15, 2023
@denis-codefresh denis-codefresh force-pushed the CR-20826-argoexec-sensitive-log branch from 05c4e52 to 4c46065 Compare December 15, 2023 13:52
@denis-codefresh denis-codefresh force-pushed the CR-20826-argoexec-sensitive-log branch from 4c46065 to af70f78 Compare December 22, 2023 09:27
@denis-codefresh denis-codefresh merged commit 8598ced into release-3.4 Dec 22, 2023
20 checks passed
@ATGardner ATGardner deleted the CR-20826-argoexec-sensitive-log branch July 14, 2024 13:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants