Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(ci): upgrade to v5 #64

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 5, 2024
Merged

chore(ci): upgrade to v5 #64

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 5, 2024

Conversation

thomasrockhu-codecov
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 5, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 98.52%. Comparing base (06b8472) to head (bbfaa69).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main      #64   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   98.52%   98.52%           
=======================================
  Files          21       21           
  Lines        6772     6772           
=======================================
  Hits         6672     6672           
  Misses        100      100           
Components Coverage Δ
core 98.60% <ø> (ø)
bindings 79.31% <ø> (ø)
python 100.00% <ø> (ø)

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Dec 5, 2024

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #64 will not alter performance

Comparing update-to-v5 (bbfaa69) with main (06b8472)

Summary

✅ 4 untouched benchmarks

@thomasrockhu-codecov thomasrockhu-codecov merged commit 1ced179 into main Dec 5, 2024
11 checks passed
@thomasrockhu-codecov thomasrockhu-codecov deleted the update-to-v5 branch December 5, 2024 23:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants