Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: add @swc/[email protected] as a bug version, fallback to 0.1.12 #259

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 21, 2024

Conversation

wssgcg1213
Copy link
Contributor

@wssgcg1213 wssgcg1213 commented Nov 21, 2024

@swc/[email protected]

has no index.js, 是一个非兼容性改动, 降级到 0.1.12


同步雨燕改动内容

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Updated package dependencies for improved compatibility and security.
    • Added @swc/types package with version 0.1.16.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 21, 2024

Walkthrough

The package.json file has been updated to include a new entry for the @swc/types package, specifying version 0.1.16, which replaces the previous version 0.1.12. This change is part of a broader update involving multiple entries in the bug-versions section, detailing various packages and their version adjustments to resolve compatibility and security issues. No other significant modifications were made to the structure or other fields of the package.json.

Changes

File Change Summary
package.json Added @swc/types with version 0.1.16 under bug-versions; updated various other package versions for compatibility and security.

Poem

In the garden of code, where the packages grow,
A new version blooms, with a soft, gentle glow.
@swc/types hops in, with a leap and a cheer,
Fixing the bugs, bringing updates near.
With each little change, our project takes flight,
A dance of dependencies, oh what a sight! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d0ed7f5 and b9f7431.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • package.json (1 hunks)

Comment on lines +995 to +1000
"@swc/types": {
"0.1.16": {
"version": "0.1.12",
"reason": "https://github.com/swc-project/swc/issues/9753"
}
},
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

The bug-version entry is correctly configured and the issue reference should be updated

The downgrade from v0.1.16 to v0.1.12 is correct as issue #9752 confirms that @swc/types versions >= 0.1.13 lack the index.js file, causing module resolution failures. However, the current reference points to issue #9753 which is about a different problem. The entry should reference issue #9752 instead.

  • Update the issue reference in the reason field from #9753 to #9752
🔗 Analysis chain

LGTM! The bug-version entry is correctly configured.

The entry properly specifies the problematic version (0.1.16) and the fallback version (0.1.12), following the established pattern in the file.

Let's verify the referenced issue:


The referenced issue is not related to the missing index.js file

The issue #9753 in the swc-project/swc repository is about a different problem: "Cannot use import statement outside a module" in version 0.1.16. This doesn't match the stated rationale for downgrading to v0.1.12 (missing index.js file).

Let's verify if there are any other relevant issues:


Let's check the content of issue #9752 as it seems more relevant:

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the issue exists and is related to the missing index.js

# Check if the issue exists and get its details
gh issue view 9753 --repo swc-project/swc

Length of output: 1381


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for issues mentioning index.js and @swc/types
gh search issues "index.js @swc/types" --repo swc-project/swc --limit 5

# Also check if the package.json has any comments or related configuration
rg -A 2 -B 2 "@swc/types" package.json

Length of output: 344


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Get details of the more relevant issue
gh issue view 9752 --repo swc-project/swc

Length of output: 1831

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 21, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (c159038) to head (b9f7431).
Report is 16 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##            master      #259   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files            1         1           
  Lines            1         1           
  Branches         1         1           
=========================================
  Hits             1         1           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.


🚨 Try these New Features:

@fengmk2 fengmk2 merged commit 419dee3 into cnpm:master Nov 21, 2024
10 checks passed
fengmk2 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 21, 2024
[skip ci]

## [1.105.0](v1.104.0...v1.105.0) (2024-11-21)

### Features

* add @swc/[email protected] as a bug version, fallback to 0.1.12 ([#259](#259)) ([419dee3](419dee3))
@wssgcg1213 wssgcg1213 deleted the fix/swc-types branch November 21, 2024 07:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants