Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: new reflect impl for non-amd64 arch #49

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Jul 23, 2024
Merged

Conversation

xiaost
Copy link
Contributor

@xiaost xiaost commented Jun 28, 2024

What type of PR is this?

feat

Check the PR title.

  • This PR title match the format: <type>(optional scope): <description>
  • The description of this PR title is user-oriented and clear enough for others to understand.
  • Attach the PR updating the user documentation if the current PR requires user awareness at the usage level. User docs repo

(Optional) Translate the PR title into Chinese.

在非amd64(x86)架构下,新的reflect实现。

(Optional) More detailed description for this PR(en: English/zh: Chinese).

en:
use FRUGAL_NO_JIT env var to enable the reflect impl on amd64

zh(optional):
使用 FRUGAL_NO_JIT 环境变量在amd64下可以启用反射版本

(Optional) Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

(optional) The PR that updates user documentation:

@xiaost xiaost requested review from a team as code owners June 28, 2024 06:58
@xiaost xiaost force-pushed the reflect branch 9 times, most recently from cb93fe2 to 04998be Compare July 8, 2024 08:58
use `FRUGAL_NO_JIT` env var to enable the reflect impl on amd64
HeyJavaBean
HeyJavaBean previously approved these changes Jul 11, 2024
internal/reflect/utils.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
internal/reflect/decoder.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
internal/reflect/reflect_test.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
internal/reflect/desc.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
internal/reflect/desc.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@xiaost xiaost merged commit 29e9968 into cloudwego:main Jul 23, 2024
10 checks passed
@xiaost xiaost deleted the reflect branch July 23, 2024 06:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants