initial structure of thesis and pre-thesis

.github/workflows/build_publish_pre_thesis.yml

@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
+name: "Build LaTeX Document"
+on: 
+  push:
+    branches:
+      - main
+    paths:
+      - 'report_pre_thesis/**'
+permissions:
+    contents: write
+defaults:
+    run:
+        working-directory: report_pre_thesis
+jobs:
+    build:
+        runs-on: ubuntu-latest
+
+        steps:
+            - name: Checkout
+              uses: actions/checkout@v3
+            - uses: actions/cache@v3
+              name: Tectonic Cache
+              with:
+                  path: ~/.cache/tectonic
+                  key: ${{ runner.os }}-tectonic-${{ hashFiles('**/*.tex') }}
+                  restore-keys: |
+                      ${{ runner.os }}-tectonic-
+            - uses: wtfjoke/setup-tectonic@v2
+              with:
+                  github-token: ${{ secrets.github_token }}
+            - name: Run Tectonic
+              run: tectonic -X build
+            - name: Generate release tag
+              id: generate_release_tag
+              uses: amitsingh-007/[email protected]
+              with:
+                  github_token: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
+            - name: Release
+              uses: ncipollo/release-action@v1
+              with:
+                  artifacts: "report/build/report/report.pdf"
+                  name: ${{ github.event.head_commit.message }}
+                  tag: ${{ steps.generate_release_tag.outputs.release_tag }}

.github/workflows/build_publish.yml → .github/workflows/build_publish_thesis.yml

@@ -3,11 +3,13 @@ on:
   push:
     branches:
       - main
+    paths:
+      - 'report_thesis/**'
 permissions:
     contents: write
 defaults:
     run:
-        working-directory: report
+        working-directory: report_thesis
 jobs:
     build:
         runs-on: ubuntu-latest

report/Tectonic.toml → report_pre_thesis/Tectonic.toml

@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 [doc]
-name = "P9 Report"
+name = "P9 Pre-Thesis"
 bundle = "https://data1.fullyjustified.net/tlextras-2022.0r0.tar"
 
 [[output]]

report_pre_thesis/src/_preamble.tex

@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+\documentclass{article}
+\title{P9 Report}
+\author{
+  Christian Bager Bach Houmann\\
+  \texttt{[email protected]}
+  \and
+  Patrick Frostholm Østergaard\\
+  \texttt{[email protected]}
+  \and
+  Ivik Lau Dalgas Hostrup\\
+  \texttt{[email protected]}
+}
+\date{}
+\begin{document}
+\maketitle

report_pre_thesis/src/index.tex

@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
+\begin{abstract}
+     Brief summary of the objectives, methodology, main findings, and significance of the report. The whole story - in short.
+\end{abstract}
+
+% Acknowledgments
+% - Acknowledge any contributions, support, or guidance from individuals, organizations, or institutions.
+
+% TODO: Convert to IEEE format
+
+\section{Introduction}
+Brief introduction to the field of study.
+Importance of establishing benchmarks.
+Objectives of the first part of the project.
+The whole story – longer version but still short, also motivates
+
+\section{Background}
+Background / Preliminaries (what you need to know in order to understand the story)
+\subsection{State of the Art}
+Current leading approaches and methods in chemometric data analysis and prediction.
+Brief description of the key technologies or techniques.
+
+\subsection{Related Work}
+A review and analysis of the current model used by NASA, as reported in a particular paper.
+Briefly address its capabilities and limitations.
+
+Related Work (What others have done and why our method is different / novel)
+
+\subsection{LIBS Setup}
+Detailed explanation of the LIBS setup, including equipment, configurations, and settings.
+Explain any variables, controls, and calibrations involved in the setup.
+
+\subsection{Data Analysis}
+Description of the samples used and their relevance.
+Explain how and why these samples were chosen.
+
+\section{Methodology}
+Method / Our Contribution (Detailed main part of the story, or how the analysis was done)
+
+\section{Results}
+Analysis / Experimental / Empirical Evaluation (the analysis, comparing our method to SoA or a baseline, ablation study)
+\begin{itemize}
+    \item System used (for repeatability)
+    \item Datasets / people used
+    \item Metrics used
+    \item Results
+    \item Discussion
+\end{itemize}
+
+\section{Conclusion}
+Conclusion (the story again, in short, emphasizing the results)
+
+Summary of the main findings of the report.
+Reiteration of the significance of the established benchmarks to the subsequent part of the project.
+
+\section{Recommendations for Future Work}
+Suggestions for potential improvements or modifications in the methodology.
+Identification of any additional benchmarks that may be relevant for future studies.

report_thesis/.gitignore

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+build

report_thesis/Tectonic.toml

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+[doc]
+name = "Thesis Report"
+bundle = "https://data1.fullyjustified.net/tlextras-2022.0r0.tar"
+
+[[output]]
+name = "report"
+type = "pdf"

report_thesis/src/_postamble.tex

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+\end{document}

report_thesis/src/_preamble.tex

@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+\documentclass{article}
+\title{P9 Report}
+\author{
+  Christian Bager Bach Houmann\\
+  \texttt{[email protected]}
+  \and
+  Patrick Frostholm Østergaard\\
+  \texttt{[email protected]}
+  \and
+  Ivik Lau Dalgas Hostrup\\
+  \texttt{[email protected]}
+}
+\date{}
+\begin{document}
+\maketitle

report_thesis/src/index.tex

@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
+\begin{abstract}
+     Brief summary of the objectives, methodology, main findings, and significance of the report. The whole story - in short.
+\end{abstract}
+
+% Acknowledgments
+% - Acknowledge any contributions, support, or guidance from individuals, organizations, or institutions.
+
+% TODO: Convert to IEEE format
+
+\section{Introduction}
+Brief introduction to the field of study.
+Importance of establishing benchmarks.
+Objectives of the first part of the project.
+The whole story – longer version but still short, also motivates
+
+\section{Background}
+Background / Preliminaries (what you need to know in order to understand the story)
+\subsection{State of the Art}
+Current leading approaches and methods in chemometric data analysis and prediction.
+Brief description of the key technologies or techniques.
+
+\subsection{Related Work}
+A review and analysis of the current model used by NASA, as reported in a particular paper.
+Briefly address its capabilities and limitations.
+
+Related Work (What others have done and why our method is different / novel)
+
+\subsection{LIBS Setup}
+Detailed explanation of the LIBS setup, including equipment, configurations, and settings.
+Explain any variables, controls, and calibrations involved in the setup.
+
+\subsection{Data Analysis}
+Description of the samples used and their relevance.
+Explain how and why these samples were chosen.
+
+\section{Methodology}
+Method / Our Contribution (Detailed main part of the story, or how the analysis was done)
+
+\section{Results}
+Analysis / Experimental / Empirical Evaluation (the analysis, comparing our method to SoA or a baseline, ablation study)
+\begin{itemize}
+    \item System used (for repeatability)
+    \item Datasets / people used
+    \item Metrics used
+    \item Results
+    \item Discussion
+\end{itemize}
+
+\section{Conclusion}
+Conclusion (the story again, in short, emphasizing the results)
+
+Summary of the main findings of the report.
+Reiteration of the significance of the established benchmarks to the subsequent part of the project.
+
+\section{Recommendations for Future Work}
+Suggestions for potential improvements or modifications in the methodology.
+Identification of any additional benchmarks that may be relevant for future studies.