Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ref(bot): use reviewDecision instead of custom calculation #762

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 25, 2021

Conversation

chdsbd
Copy link
Owner

@chdsbd chdsbd commented Nov 24, 2021

We can use reviewDecision to hopefully provide a more consistent view of reviews for a pull request.

My theory for some of the issues in #761 is that the GitHub API is being inconsistent when called via the v3 API vs the GraphQL API. Using only reviewDecision will help us avoid depending on the v3 API.

I've deployed this change

We can use reviewDecision to hopefully provide a more consistent view of reviews for a pull request.
@chdsbd chdsbd requested a review from sbdchd November 24, 2021 19:28
@chdsbd chdsbd added the automerge Mark PR for auto merge by Kodiak label Nov 24, 2021
@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot merged commit e60988d into master Nov 25, 2021
@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot deleted the chris/review-cleanup branch November 25, 2021 02:05
kodiakhq bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 25, 2021
Remove some old code that is unnecessary as of #762
kodiakhq bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 25, 2021
A regression was introduced with #762 that caused the bot to attempt to update pull requests when changes were requested. This change fixes that issue.

related #761
kodiakhq bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 26, 2021
This is enum is unused now since #762.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
automerge Mark PR for auto merge by Kodiak
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants