[LP#1940328] Add loadbalancer relation named lb-consumers #5
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
addyess
force-pushed
the
lp1940328/relation-lp-consumers
branch
from
29a1856
to
cdd1460
Compare
addyess
force-pushed
the
lp1940328/relation-lp-consumers
branch
from
cdd1460
to
7bd1359
Compare
addyess
changed the title
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
LP#1940328
It's a long time coming, but we're finally going to address this bug by adding the lb-consumer to this charm, updating it to support both the old
loadbalancer:public-httprelation as the currentlb-consumers:loadbalancerrelation.By supporting both -- the 1.28/stable charms can relate to this updated charm, then migrate to the
lb-consumersrelatoin