Peer Review - Chih-Yu Chinag

[ChihYuChiang]

Evaluation of final project by JongyoonBaik

Topic	Excellent	Satisfactory	Needs Work
Coding style	v
Coding strategy		v
Presentation: graphs	v
Presentation: tables	v
Achievement, creativity		v
Ease of access		v

Remarks:

• We encountered the same file size problem, and decided to just save all our clunky raw data files in another cloud storage. On the other hand, we used save() and load() functions to export and import necessary R Objects (such as a df), which are often way smaller than the original ones.
• Typo in the sub-title of homepage, “a conflict resoultion method”.
• Well documented foot note.
• Formal and careful elaboration.
• When comparing multiple year data of different regions, is it clearer to just use the over-laying line plots like the first figure in the home page?
• I like the use of horizontal lines between main topics!
• Code itself is clear. But since you did not provide original .R files of the analysis, and neither a clear work flow is described, it would be less convenient if try to reproduce the analysis.