Fixed issue where rhel >8 packages would not have correct openssl dep…

…endency version

libcurl will likely have a hard dependency on the exact version so include it in our Requires: entries.

Ticket: ENT-12587
Changelog: title

build-scripts/package

@@ -136,12 +136,18 @@ case "$PACKAGING" in
             echo "error: unable to determine selinux-policy package version"
             exit 1
         fi
+        OPENSSL_VERSION=$(rpm -q --qf '%{VERSION}\n' openssl | sed  's/\([0-9]*.[0-9]*.\)[0-9]*/\10/')
+        if [ -z "$OPENSSL_VERSION" ]; then
+            echo "error: unable to determine openssl package version"
+            exit 1
+        fi
     fi
 
     sed \
         -e "s/@@VERSION@@/$RPM_VERSION/g" \
         -e "s/@@RELEASE@@/$safe_prefix$RPM_RELEASE/g" \
         -e "s/@@SELINUX_POLICY_VERSION@@/$SELINUX_POLICY_VERSION/g" \
+        -e "s/@@OPENSSL_VERSION@@/$OPENSSL_VERSION/g" \
         -e "/^%pre\$/r $PREINSTALL" \
         -e "/^%post\$/r $POSTINSTALL" \
         -e "/^%preun\$/r $PREREMOVE" \

packaging/cfengine-nova/cfengine-nova.spec.in

@@ -29,9 +29,11 @@ Requires: libssl.so.1.1()(64bit) libssl.so.1.1(OPENSSL_1_1_0)(64bit) libssl.so.1
 Requires: libcrypto.so.1.1()(64bit) libcrypto.so.1.1(OPENSSL_1_1_0)(64bit)
 %endif
 
+# libcurl will end up depending on the specific version we build with so list that as a requirement.
+# OPENSSL_VERSION is determined in build-scripts/package script in this same project.
 %if %{?rhel}%{!?rhel:0} > 8
-Requires: libcrypto.so.3()(64bit) libcrypto.so.3(OPENSSL_3.0.0)(64bit) libcrypto.so.3(OPENSSL_3.0.1)(64bit)
-Requires: libssl.so.3()(64bit) libssl.so.3(OPENSSL_3.0.0)(64bit)
+Requires: libcrypto.so.3()(64bit) libcrypto.so.3(OPENSSL_@@OPENSSL_VERSION@@)(64bit)
+Requires: libssl.so.3()(64bit) libssl.so.3(OPENSSL_@@OPENSSL_VERSION@@)(64bit)
 %endif
 
 AutoReqProv: no