-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 86
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feat: decrease debt #1857
Merged
Merged
Feat: decrease debt #1857
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -601,9 +601,22 @@ fn increase_debt_does_not_withdraw() { | |
let loan_id = util::create_loan(loan); | ||
|
||
let amount = ExternalAmount::new(QUANTITY, PRICE_VALUE); | ||
config_mocks(amount.balance().unwrap()); | ||
MockPrices::mock_get(|id, pool_id| { | ||
assert_eq!(*pool_id, POOL_A); | ||
match *id { | ||
REGISTER_PRICE_ID => Ok((PRICE_VALUE, BLOCK_TIME_MS)), | ||
_ => Err(PRICE_ID_NO_FOUND), | ||
} | ||
}); | ||
MockPrices::mock_register_id(|id, pool_id| { | ||
assert_eq!(*pool_id, POOL_A); | ||
match *id { | ||
REGISTER_PRICE_ID => Ok(()), | ||
_ => Err(PRICE_ID_NO_FOUND), | ||
} | ||
}); | ||
|
||
assert_ok!(Loans::borrow( | ||
assert_ok!(Loans::increase_debt( | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Yes, amazing test haha. I had this modified in the cashflows. This is an example of how to not test correctly 😆 |
||
RuntimeOrigin::signed(BORROWER), | ||
POOL_A, | ||
loan_id, | ||
|
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
CR: Add unit test(s) for this. We must not merge PRs which add/alter code without adding/updating tests.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not adding new logic IMO, just sparing the
T::Pool::repay(..)
which will be mocked. Sopub fn repay(..)
should already cover everything.If you disagree, can still add a test.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There is a super simple
fn increase_debt_does_not_withdraw()
test for theincrease_debt()
case, maybe we can create a similar one intests/repay_loan.rs
checking that nothing goes to the pool. Of course, paranoid mode-on just ensuring future refactors does not break the invariant here