chore: regenerate wrappers #342
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces significant updates to the Go bindings for Ethereum smart contracts in two files: Changes
Possibly related PRs
Warning There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool’s configuration or disable the tool if it’s a critical failure. 🔧 golangci-lint (1.61.0)level=warning msg="[config_reader] The configuration option Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
wrappers/Blobstream.sol/wrapper.go(1 hunks)wrappers/ERC1967Proxy.sol/wrapper.go(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
wrappers/ERC1967Proxy.sol/wrapper.go (3)
Line range hint 38-42: LGTM: Proper deprecation notices
The deprecated variables are properly marked and provide clear guidance to use the centralized WrappersMetaData structure instead. This change improves maintainability by centralizing metadata management.
35-35: Verify the contract bytecode integrity
The contract bytecode has been updated. Since this is a proxy contract implementation, it's crucial to verify that the bytecode matches the compiled source contract.
Line range hint 1-24: Verify the contract's upgrade capability
The contract implements the ERC1967 proxy pattern with proper event definitions for admin changes and upgrades. This is critical for the contract's upgradeability feature.
✅ Verification successful
Contract's upgrade capability is properly implemented
The contract correctly implements the UUPS (Universal Upgradeable Proxy Standard) upgrade pattern:
- Inherits from
UUPSUpgradeableandInitializablecontracts from OpenZeppelin - Implements
_authorizeUpgradefunction withonlyOwnermodifier for secure upgrades - Includes proper storage slot management warning in comments
- Generated bindings include all necessary upgrade-related events and functions
The review comment's concern about upgrade capability is addressed by the implementation.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for any custom modifications to the upgrade pattern
rg -A 2 "function upgradeTo\("
# Verify the upgrade-related events are consistently implemented
ast-grep --pattern 'event Upgraded(address indexed implementation)'
ast-grep --pattern 'event AdminChanged(address previousAdmin, address newAdmin)'
Length of output: 185
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for the contract interface and implementation files
fd -e sol .
# Check for any proxy-related imports or inheritance
rg -l "ERC1967"
# Look for upgrade-related functions in Go bindings
rg -A 2 "func.*Upgrade"
# Check for admin-related functions in Go bindings
rg -A 2 "func.*Admin"
Length of output: 27813
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the actual contract implementation
fd -e sol . -x cat {} | rg -A 5 "contract.*ERC1967Proxy|contract.*Blobstream"
# Check for upgrade-related events in the contracts
fd -e sol . -x cat {} | rg "event.*Upgraded|event.*AdminChanged"
# Look for UUPS implementation
fd -e sol . -x cat {} | rg "UUPSUpgradeable|_authorizeUpgrade"
Length of output: 1220
regenerates the wrappers
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation