-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 88
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove some pending tests #1778
Conversation
Transaction cost differencesNo cost or size differences found |
Transaction costsSizes and execution budgets for Hydra protocol transactions. Note that unlisted parameters are currently using
Script summary
|
Parties | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 6165 | 10.17 | 3.24 | 0.53 |
2 | 6365 | 12.04 | 3.82 | 0.56 |
3 | 6564 | 14.09 | 4.46 | 0.59 |
5 | 6966 | 18.67 | 5.93 | 0.65 |
10 | 7975 | 28.90 | 9.15 | 0.80 |
44 | 14810 | 98.04 | 30.85 | 1.82 |
Commit
transaction costs
This uses ada-only outputs for better comparability.
UTxO | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 561 | 2.45 | 1.17 | 0.20 |
2 | 742 | 3.40 | 1.74 | 0.22 |
3 | 922 | 4.39 | 2.34 | 0.24 |
5 | 1275 | 6.46 | 3.61 | 0.28 |
10 | 2177 | 12.24 | 7.28 | 0.40 |
54 | 10066 | 99.20 | 68.72 | 1.89 |
CollectCom
transaction costs
Parties | UTxO (bytes) | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 57 | 525 | 24.20 | 7.07 | 0.42 |
2 | 114 | 636 | 31.94 | 9.30 | 0.50 |
3 | 171 | 747 | 40.85 | 11.84 | 0.60 |
4 | 225 | 858 | 53.25 | 15.18 | 0.73 |
5 | 283 | 969 | 60.38 | 17.27 | 0.81 |
6 | 339 | 1085 | 74.88 | 21.20 | 0.96 |
7 | 396 | 1192 | 86.80 | 24.51 | 1.08 |
8 | 452 | 1303 | 91.38 | 25.96 | 1.13 |
Cost of Increment Transaction
Parties | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 1814 | 24.13 | 8.02 | 0.48 |
2 | 1960 | 25.09 | 9.04 | 0.50 |
3 | 2136 | 28.04 | 10.67 | 0.55 |
5 | 2390 | 31.21 | 13.05 | 0.60 |
10 | 3213 | 40.07 | 19.39 | 0.76 |
41 | 7935 | 99.27 | 59.65 | 1.73 |
Cost of Decrement Transaction
Parties | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 601 | 22.72 | 7.32 | 0.41 |
2 | 767 | 23.39 | 8.17 | 0.43 |
3 | 975 | 28.02 | 10.14 | 0.49 |
5 | 1172 | 28.95 | 11.72 | 0.52 |
10 | 2079 | 40.20 | 18.22 | 0.70 |
41 | 6820 | 98.81 | 55.34 | 1.65 |
Close
transaction costs
Parties | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 677 | 27.03 | 8.73 | 0.46 |
2 | 882 | 29.29 | 10.22 | 0.50 |
3 | 1089 | 31.39 | 11.66 | 0.54 |
5 | 1266 | 34.05 | 13.71 | 0.58 |
10 | 1911 | 45.13 | 20.45 | 0.75 |
38 | 6338 | 95.70 | 56.50 | 1.61 |
Contest
transaction costs
Parties | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 674 | 33.39 | 10.43 | 0.52 |
2 | 799 | 35.38 | 11.70 | 0.56 |
3 | 1012 | 37.74 | 13.22 | 0.59 |
5 | 1330 | 42.38 | 16.07 | 0.67 |
10 | 1982 | 52.29 | 22.49 | 0.82 |
32 | 5301 | 99.89 | 52.65 | 1.57 |
Abort
transaction costs
There is some variation due to the random mixture of initial and already committed outputs.
Parties | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 6051 | 26.05 | 8.82 | 0.69 |
2 | 6175 | 34.66 | 11.71 | 0.79 |
3 | 6275 | 43.41 | 14.66 | 0.88 |
4 | 6468 | 52.03 | 17.69 | 0.98 |
5 | 6686 | 63.38 | 21.54 | 1.11 |
6 | 6684 | 70.86 | 23.95 | 1.19 |
7 | 6834 | 77.22 | 26.15 | 1.26 |
8 | 6941 | 86.20 | 29.11 | 1.36 |
9 | 7161 | 98.34 | 33.42 | 1.50 |
FanOut
transaction costs
Involves spending head output and burning head tokens. Uses ada-only UTXO for better comparability.
Parties | UTxO | UTxO (bytes) | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
10 | 0 | 0 | 6162 | 18.03 | 6.15 | 0.61 |
10 | 1 | 57 | 6197 | 19.99 | 6.94 | 0.63 |
10 | 5 | 285 | 6332 | 27.25 | 9.88 | 0.72 |
10 | 10 | 569 | 6501 | 37.40 | 13.95 | 0.84 |
10 | 30 | 1708 | 7182 | 77.15 | 29.92 | 1.31 |
10 | 40 | 2276 | 7520 | 95.81 | 37.45 | 1.53 |
10 | 41 | 2332 | 7553 | 97.25 | 38.05 | 1.54 |
End-to-end benchmark results
This page is intended to collect the latest end-to-end benchmark results produced by Hydra's continuous integration (CI) system from the latest master
code.
Please note that these results are approximate as they are currently produced from limited cloud VMs and not controlled hardware. Rather than focusing on the absolute results, the emphasis should be on relative results, such as how the timings for a scenario evolve as the code changes.
Generated at 2025-01-08 15:39:28.656240309 UTC
Baseline Scenario
Number of nodes | 1 |
---|---|
Number of txs | 300 |
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms) | 4.327407816 |
P99 | 11.21693671999998ms |
P95 | 5.056102750000001ms |
P50 | 4.1193825ms |
Number of Invalid txs | 0 |
Three local nodes
Number of nodes | 3 |
---|---|
Number of txs | 900 |
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms) | 24.201909395 |
P99 | 116.8438116ms |
P95 | 33.2123075ms |
P50 | 21.697401ms |
Number of Invalid txs | 0 |
Test Results 5 files ±0 165 suites ±0 30m 36s ⏱️ -5s Results for commit 8fd0f27. ± Comparison against base commit 2039d7c. This pull request removes 4 and adds 4 tests. Note that renamed tests count towards both.
♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results. |
736993c
to
8fd0f27
Compare
Two small changes:
pendingWith
calls that were just invalidxit
toit
statements for things that were presently already working, but for some reason we were expecting them not to.