Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Experimental/24.09 bgp #193

Merged

Conversation

fnordahl
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

Signed-off-by: Frode Nordahl <[email protected]>
Without this, routes like:
local fe80::b1:97ff:feb0:af95 dev eth1-bgp proto kernel metric 0 pref medium

are removed which prevents the bgp daemon from maintaining its
connection with its peer.

Signed-off-by: Frode Nordahl <[email protected]>
@fnordahl fnordahl force-pushed the experimental/24.09-bgp branch 2 times, most recently from 6382fa0 to b19cab4 Compare October 24, 2024 04:16
Use 32-bit RFC 6996 Private Use AS-numbers.

Signed-off-by: Frode Nordahl <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Martin Kalcok <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Frode Nordahl <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Martin Kalcok <[email protected]>
The end goal is to have full BGP unnumbered support including
routing of IPv4 prefixes over IPv6 nexthop, but the support is not
yet there.

Signed-off-by: Frode Nordahl <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Martin Kalcok <[email protected]>
@mkalcok mkalcok force-pushed the experimental/24.09-bgp branch from b19cab4 to 6af41c1 Compare November 1, 2024 11:05
@mkalcok
Copy link
Contributor

mkalcok commented Nov 1, 2024

I took a liberty of fixing up the bgp tests, now they should work. Overall, the tests need a bit of polish, I can see some duplication and badly named parameters. But that's on me and I can address that in separate PR.

@fnordahl fnordahl marked this pull request as ready for review November 1, 2024 12:50
@fnordahl fnordahl requested a review from a team as a code owner November 1, 2024 12:50
@fnordahl
Copy link
Member Author

fnordahl commented Nov 1, 2024

I took a liberty of fixing up the bgp tests, now they should work. Overall, the tests need a bit of polish, I can see some duplication and badly named parameters. But that's on me and I can address that in separate PR.

Great, thanks @mkalcok !

@fnordahl fnordahl merged commit e11f857 into canonical:experimental/24.09-bgp Nov 1, 2024
25 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants