-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 23
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
charmhub incorrectly recognises a charm's substrate #1417
Comments
I will repeat here what I said on Mattermost: The homepage of Charmhub uses the In this case, the value of this field is empty. When this value is empty, we decided to show VM because it was the case for most of the charms. @Roadmaster, could the API consider what Tom mentioned in the metadata.yaml to return "Kubernetes"? |
I would like to have some documentation on what the possible values for "assumes" are, before updating the rule that determines Thanks! |
All I can find is https://juju.is/docs/sdk/assumes but that doesn't seem to cover all the values (it seems like it can be anything). |
At this point Juju only processes |
Is this being tracked somewhere else? Happy to leave this issue open until we hear more, but it sounds like there's nothing for the webteam to do for now. |
@Roadmaster is there an update on this? Should we be tracking the issue elsewhere? |
Currently https://charmhub.io/nginx-ingress-integrator is listed as "Ubuntu 20.04" in terms of platform. However, this is a k8s charm, as denoted by the following in metadata.yaml:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: