Skip to content
Pull Requests

Increasing test coverage #86

Sign in to view logs

Increasing test coverage

Increasing test coverage #86

Triggered via pull request November 22, 2023 22:51
@IbraAoadIbraAoad
opened #50
test_coverage
Status Failure
Total duration 53s
Artifacts –

pull-request.yaml

on: pull_request
PR  /  Check against ignorelist
4s
PR / Check against ignorelist
PR  /  ...  /  Static Analysis of Libs
19s
PR / Quality Checks / Static Analysis / Static Analysis of Libs
PR  /  ...  /  Static Analysis of Charm
15s
PR / Quality Checks / Static Analysis / Static Analysis of Charm
PR  /  ...  /  Lint
10s
PR / Quality Checks / Linting / Lint
PR  /  ...  /  Unit tests
17s
PR / Quality Checks / Unit Tests / Unit tests
PR  /  ...  /  Scenario tests
8s
PR / Quality Checks / Scenario Tests / Scenario tests
PR  /  ...  /  Check the CHARMHUB_TOKEN secret
0s
PR / Quality Checks / Check the CHARMHUB_TOKEN secret
PR  /  ...  /  check
5s
PR / Quality Checks / Inclusive naming / check
Matrix: PR / Quality Checks / CodeQL analysis / Analyze
Waiting for pending jobs
PR  /  ...  /  Integration Tests
PR / Quality Checks / Integration Tests / Integration Tests
PR  /  ...  /  Check libraries
25s
PR / Quality Checks / Check libraries
Fit to window
Zoom out
Zoom in

Annotations

4 errors
[Inclusive naming check] charm/tests/unit/test_charm.py#L105: charm/tests/unit/test_charm.py#L105
[warning] `dummy` may be insensitive, use `placeholder`, `sample` instead
[Inclusive naming check] charm/tests/unit/test_charm.py#L113: charm/tests/unit/test_charm.py#L113
[warning] `dummy` may be insensitive, use `placeholder`, `sample` instead
PR / Quality Checks / Inclusive naming / check
Process completed with exit code 1.
PR / Quality Checks / Linting / Lint
Process completed with exit code 1.