Recommend signed authentication requests for CIBA #217
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
eric-murray
requested review from
jpengar,
AxelNennker and
sebdewet
as code owners
This was referenced Oct 22, 2024
AxelNennker
approved these changes
Nov 5, 2024
jpengar
approved these changes
Nov 7, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What type of PR is this?
What this PR does / why we need it:
The current CAMARA specification allows either signed or unsigned authentication requests to be used for CIBA, with no guidance as to which should be used. This PR adds a recommendation that signed authentication requests be used, as these are more secure than unsigned authentication requests.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #194
Special notes for reviewers:
None
Changelog input
Additional documentation
None