Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(context-client): generalize implementation #903

Merged
merged 16 commits into from
Nov 2, 2024

Conversation

petarjuki7
Copy link
Member

@petarjuki7 petarjuki7 commented Oct 31, 2024

Part of refactoring of the contract clients

This does not compile yet

crates/context/config/src/client/protocol/near.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
crates/context/config/src/client/protocol/near.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
crates/context/src/lib.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@petarjuki7 petarjuki7 marked this pull request as ready for review October 31, 2024 19:21
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
pub mod config;
// pub mod proxy;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I removed this to reduce the scope of the PR, crates/context/config/src/client/env/proxy.rs should be addressed independently

@@ -0,0 +1,101 @@
use crate::client::protocol::near::Near;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I left the file just for future reference

@petarjuki7
Copy link
Member Author

Is this fine to be merged now?
cc: @miraclx @xilosada

@miraclx miraclx enabled auto-merge (squash) November 2, 2024 15:15
@miraclx miraclx changed the title Refactoring of contract clients feat(context-client): generalize implementation Nov 2, 2024
@miraclx miraclx merged commit cf9eadd into master Nov 2, 2024
15 checks passed
@miraclx miraclx deleted the petarjuki7/protocols-refactor branch November 2, 2024 15:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants