This repository has been archived by the owner on Jun 16, 2023. It is now read-only.
Adopt ruff #23
Merged
Adopt ruff #23
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
britt-allen
approved these changes
Feb 14, 2023
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This swaps out flake8 (linting), isort (import sorting), and pyupgrade (syntax modernization) for the ruff project, which has been taking the python world by storm. It's simpler to use and configure than those tools, and much faster as it's written in rust.
I was motivated to do this over in cagov/data-infrastructure#43 and it was easy enough to copy over here.