Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(deps): update prisma monorepo to v5.14.0 #328

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 26, 2024

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented May 14, 2024

Mend Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
@prisma/client (source) 5.13.0 -> 5.14.0 age adoption passing confidence
prisma (source) 5.13.0 -> 5.14.0 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

prisma/prisma (@​prisma/client)

v5.14.0

Compare Source

Today, we are excited to share the 5.14.0 stable release 🎉

🌟 Help us spread the word about Prisma by starring the repo ☝️ or posting on X about the release. 🌟

Highlights
Share your feedback about Prisma ORM

We want to know how you like working with Prisma ORM in your projects! Please take our 2min survey and let us know what you like or where we can improve 🙏

createManyAndReturn()

We’re happy to announce the availability of a new, top-level Prisma Client query: createManyAndReturn(). It works similarly to createMany() but uses a RETURNING clause in the SQL query to retrieve the records that were just created.

Here’s an example of creating multiple posts and then immediately returning those posts.

const postBodies = req.json()['posts']

const posts = prisma.post.createManyAndReturn({
	data: postBodies
});

return posts

Additionally,createManyAndReturn() supports the same options as findMany(), such as the ability to return only specific fields.

const postBodies = req.json()['posts']

const postTitles = prisma.post.createManyAndReturn({
	data: postBodies,
	select: {
	  title: true,
	},
});

return postTitles

Note: Because createManyAndReturn() uses the RETURNING clause, it is only supported by PostgreSQL, CockroachDB, and SQLite databases. At this time, relationLoadStrategy: join is not supported in createManyAndReturn() queries.

MongoDB performance improvements

Previously, Prisma ORM suffered from performance issues when using the in operator or when including related models in queries against a MongoDB database. These queries were translated by the Prisma query engine in such a way that indexes were skipped and collection scans were used, leading to slower queries especially on large datasets.

With 5.14.0, Prisma ORM now rewrites queries to use a combination of $or and $eq operators, leading to dramatic performance increases for queries that include in operators or relation loading.

Fixes and improvements
Prisma Client
Prisma Migrate
Language tools (e.g. VS Code)
Company news
Prisma Changelog

Curious about all things Prisma? Be sure to check out the Prisma Changelog for updates across Prisma's products, including ORM, Accelerate, and Pulse!

Credits

Huge thanks to @​pranayat, @​yubrot, @​skyzh, @​anuraaga, @​gutyerrez, @​avallete, @​ceddy4395, @​Kayoshi-dev for helping!


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/prisma-monorepo branch 4 times, most recently from b031b51 to c52f996 Compare May 26, 2024 12:03
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/prisma-monorepo branch from c52f996 to ca1c5c9 Compare May 26, 2024 17:01
@renovate renovate bot merged commit 42e932b into main May 26, 2024
1 check passed
@renovate renovate bot deleted the renovate/prisma-monorepo branch May 26, 2024 18:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants