Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Using RtlCaptureStackBackTrace instead of StackWalk64 #334

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

solomakha-eugene
Copy link

Use RtlCaptureStackBackTrace instead of StackWolker64 in case of missing context

@solomakha-eugene solomakha-eugene changed the title Using RtlCaptureStackBackTrace instead of StackWolker64 Using RtlCaptureStackBackTrace instead of StackWalk64 Apr 11, 2024
@solomakha-eugene solomakha-eugene force-pushed the simplified-stack-acquisition-without-context branch from fb847d4 to 18f8f1c Compare April 11, 2024 07:27
@mgerhardy mgerhardy mentioned this pull request May 1, 2024
5 tasks
mgerhardy added a commit to vengi-voxel/vengi that referenced this pull request May 1, 2024
Use RtlCaptureStackBackTrace instead of StackWolker64 in case of missing context

see bombela/backward-cpp#334
@mgerhardy
Copy link
Contributor

This fixed the missing stacktraces for me on windows - thanks a lot

mgerhardy added a commit to vengi-voxel/vengi that referenced this pull request May 2, 2024
Use RtlCaptureStackBackTrace instead of StackWolker64 in case of missing context

see bombela/backward-cpp#334
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants