Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update dependency typescript-eslint to v8.12.2 #131

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 4, 2024

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Nov 4, 2024

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
typescript-eslint (source) 8.12.0 -> 8.12.2 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint (typescript-eslint)

v8.12.2

Compare Source

This was a version bump only for typescript-eslint to align it with other projects, there were no code changes.

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

v8.12.1

Compare Source

This was a version bump only for typescript-eslint to align it with other projects, there were no code changes.

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "after 8am on Monday" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@github-actions github-actions bot merged commit ec5161e into main Nov 4, 2024
1 check passed
@renovate renovate bot deleted the renovate/typescript-eslint-monorepo branch November 4, 2024 13:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants