Add BitProLayout component (#9502) #9509
Conversation
|
Important Review skippedAuto incremental reviews are disabled on this repository. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the WalkthroughA new Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Nitpick comments (14)
src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI.Extras/Components/ProLayout/BitProLayout.scss (3)
35-35: Consider using lower z-index values.Multiple sections use
z-index: 999999, which is extremely high and might cause issues with other components. Consider using a more reasonable z-index scale (e.g., 100, 200, etc.) to maintain better stacking context management.Also applies to: 42-42, 65-65, 72-72
53-61: Enhance scroll behavior compatibility.The main section's scroll behavior could be improved:
- Add vendor prefixes for broader browser support
- Consider adding
-webkit-overflow-scrolling: touchfor better iOS scrolling- Consider adding
scroll-paddingproperties if the layout contains anchor links.bit-ply-main { height: 100%; display: flex; overflow: auto; position: relative; scroll-behavior: smooth; overscroll-behavior: none; + -webkit-overflow-scrolling: touch; + -webkit-overscroll-behavior: none; width: calc(100% - var(--bit-ply-inset-left) - var(--bit-ply-inset-right)); }
25-75: Consider adding accessibility enhancements.While the layout structure is solid, consider enhancing accessibility by:
- Adding appropriate ARIA roles for landmark regions (e.g.,
header,main,complementary,footer)- Ensuring sufficient color contrast ratios when using
$clr-bg-pri- Adding support for reduced motion preferences
These enhancements should be implemented in the component's markup and corresponding styles:
@media (prefers-reduced-motion: reduce) { .bit-ply-main { scroll-behavior: auto; } }src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI.Extras/Components/ProLayout/BitProLayoutClassStyles.cs (1)
3-4: Consider sealing the classSince this class is a simple data container and not designed for inheritance, consider marking it as
sealedto prevent unintended derivation and make the design intent explicit.-public class BitProLayoutClassStyles +public sealed class BitProLayoutClassStylessrc/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI.Extras/Components/ProLayout/BitProLayout.razor.cs (2)
20-21: Remove unnecessary empty linesRemove the consecutive empty lines to maintain consistent code formatting.
5-8: Enhance parameter documentationThe current documentation could be more descriptive. Consider adding examples and explaining the expected content type (e.g., HTML content, components).
/// <summary> -/// The content of the layout. +/// The content to be rendered in the main area of the layout. +/// This can include HTML content or other Blazor components. /// </summary>src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI.Extras/Components/ProLayout/BitProLayout.razor (1)
14-18: Consider conditional rendering for empty sectionsThe left and right sections are rendered as empty divs when no content is provided. Consider conditionally rendering these sections only when they have content or styles.
-<div style="@Styles?.Left" class="bit-ply-left @Classes?.Left"></div> +@if (Classes?.Left != null || Styles?.Left != null) +{ + <aside style="@Styles?.Left" class="bit-ply-left @Classes?.Left" role="complementary"></aside> +}src/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Extras/ProLayout/BitProLayoutDemo.razor (2)
5-7: Improve the PageOutlet descriptionThe current description "prolayout component of the bit BlazorUI components" needs improvement:
- Capitalize "prolayout" and "bit"
- Provide more descriptive information about the component's purpose
Consider updating to:
- Description="prolayout component of the bit BlazorUI components" /> + Description="ProLayout component provides an advanced layout structure for Bit BlazorUI applications" />
14-23: Consider adding code samples to the exampleWhile the links to live demos are helpful, it would be beneficial to include actual code samples showing:
- Basic usage of BitProLayout
- Common configuration patterns
- Examples of different layout sections
Would you like me to help generate sample code snippets for the demo?
src/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Components/ComponentExampleBox.razor (2)
45-54: Fix inconsistent code indentationThe indentation in the code display section is inconsistent:
- Line 45 has different indentation than line 49
- The C# code block uses inconsistent spacing
Consider normalizing the indentation:
- <code class="language-cshtml">@RazorCode.Trim()</code> + <code class="language-cshtml">@RazorCode.Trim()</code> @if (CsharpCode.HasValue()) { - <code class="language-csharp"> - @code { - @CsharpCode.Trim().Replace("\n", "\n ") - }</code> + <code class="language-csharp"> + @code { + @CsharpCode.Trim().Replace("\n", "\n ") + } + </code>
9-25: Consider extracting button classes to constantsThe button classes and messages contain hardcoded strings that could be moved to constants for better maintainability.
Consider creating constants for:
- CSS classes: "header-btn", "show-code", "code-shown"
- Button messages: "Hide code", "Show code"
src/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Extras/ProLayout/BitProLayoutDemo.razor.cs (2)
3-4: Add XML documentation for the classThe class lacks XML documentation which would be helpful for developers using the component.
Consider adding:
+/// <summary> +/// Demo page for the BitProLayout component showcasing its usage and configuration options. +/// </summary> public partial class BitProLayoutDemo
5-32: Consider adding validation attributes for parametersThe component parameters could benefit from validation attributes to ensure proper usage.
Consider adding:
[Parameter]attribute for component parameters[EditorRequired]for required parameters[CascadingParameter]for any cascading valuessrc/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Home/ComponentsSection.razor (1)
256-258: LGTM! Component link follows established patterns.The ProLayout component link is correctly implemented, following the existing structure and styling conventions.
Consider adding a featured tag to highlight this significant layout component, similar to other featured components like Dropdown and Nav:
<BitLink Href="/components/prolayout" title="ProLayout" Style="display: flex"> <BitText Typography="BitTypography.Subtitle1">ProLayout</BitText> + <BitText Typography="BitTypography.Subtitle2" Class="featured">featured</BitText> </BitLink>
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (10)
src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI.Extras/Components/ProLayout/BitProLayout.razor(1 hunks)src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI.Extras/Components/ProLayout/BitProLayout.razor.cs(1 hunks)src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI.Extras/Components/ProLayout/BitProLayout.scss(1 hunks)src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI.Extras/Components/ProLayout/BitProLayoutClassStyles.cs(1 hunks)src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI.Extras/Styles/components.scss(1 hunks)src/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Components/ComponentExampleBox.razor(2 hunks)src/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Extras/ProLayout/BitProLayoutDemo.razor(1 hunks)src/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Extras/ProLayout/BitProLayoutDemo.razor.cs(1 hunks)src/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Home/ComponentsSection.razor(1 hunks)src/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Shared/NavMenu.razor.cs(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI.Extras/Styles/components.scss
🔇 Additional comments (3)
src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI.Extras/Components/ProLayout/BitProLayout.scss (2)
30-30: Verify the $clr-bg-pri variable definition.
The layout uses the $clr-bg-pri variable for background color. Ensure this variable is properly defined in the imported functions.scss file.
✅ Verification successful
The $clr-bg-pri variable is properly defined and used throughout the codebase
The variable is defined in src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI/Styles/theme-variables.scss as:
$clr-bg-pri: var(--bit-clr-bg-pri);This is a CSS custom property that's used consistently across multiple components in the Blazor UI library, including the ProLayout component. The variable is properly defined and follows the project's theming system.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for $clr-bg-pri variable definition
rg --type scss '\$clr-bg-pri'
Length of output: 60
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for $clr-bg-pri variable definition using ripgrep without file type filter
rg '\$clr-bg-pri'
Length of output: 21008
13-14:
Add fallback for undefined CSS variables.
The layout uses --win-width and --win-height variables that aren't defined in this file. This could lead to invalid calculations if these variables are not defined elsewhere.
Consider providing fallback values:
- --bit-ply-width: calc(var(--win-width) - var(--bit-ply-inset-left) - var(--bit-ply-inset-right));
- --bit-ply-height: calc(var(--win-height) - var(--bit-ply-inset-top) - var(--bit-ply-inset-bottom));
+ --bit-ply-width: calc(var(--win-width, 100vw) - var(--bit-ply-inset-left) - var(--bit-ply-inset-right));
+ --bit-ply-height: calc(var(--win-height, 100vh) - var(--bit-ply-inset-top) - var(--bit-ply-inset-bottom));src/BlazorUI/Demo/Client/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Shared/NavMenu.razor.cs (1)
159-159: LGTM! Nav item addition follows conventions.
The ProLayout navigation item is correctly added to the Extras section, following the established pattern and naming conventions.
src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI.Extras/Components/ProLayout/BitProLayout.scss
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI.Extras/Components/ProLayout/BitProLayout.razor.cs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI.Extras/Components/ProLayout/BitProLayout.razor
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...nt/Bit.BlazorUI.Demo.Client.Core/Pages/Components/Extras/ProLayout/BitProLayoutDemo.razor.cs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
closes #9502
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
BitProLayoutcomponent for flexible layout management in Blazor applications.BitProLayoutcomponent, accessible at/components/prolayout.ProLayoutadded to the main menu.Bug Fixes
Documentation
Bit.BlazorUI.ExtrasNuGet package.Style
BitProLayoutcomponent, ensuring responsive design and proper spacing on various devices.