Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Security upgrade rspec-rails from 6.1.2 to 6.1.3 #256

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 20, 2024

Conversation

jfederico
Copy link
Member

This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.


![snyk-top-banner](https://github.com/andygongea/OWASP-Benchmark/assets/818805/c518c423-16fe-447e-b67f-ad5a49b5d123)

Snyk has created this PR to fix 1 vulnerabilities in the rubygems dependencies of this project.

Snyk changed the following file(s):

  • Gemfile
  • Gemfile.lock

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed with an upgrade:

Issue Score
medium severity Web Cache Poisoning
SNYK-RUBY-RACK-1061917
  616  

Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Learn about vulnerability in an interactive lesson of Snyk Learn.

@jfederico jfederico merged commit 1d84d55 into master Jun 20, 2024
2 of 3 checks passed
@jfederico jfederico deleted the snyk-fix-9f6bc90985374010049fb5abd99455cf branch June 20, 2024 18:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants