Added MARTY and whitepaper section

_pages/publications.md

@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ author_profile: true
 
 [Journal Articles](#journal-articles)\
 [Conference Papers](#conference-papers)\
+[White Papers](#white-papers)\
 [Academic](#academic)\
 [Presentations](#presentations)
 
@@ -31,6 +32,14 @@ author_profile: true
   {% endif %}
 {% endfor %}
 
+## White Papers
+{% for post in site.publications reversed %}
+  {% if post.pubtype == 'whitepaper' %}
+      {% include archive-single.html %}
+  {% endif %}
+{% endfor %}
+
+
 ## Academic
 {% for post in site.publications reversed %}
   {% if post.pubtype == 'academic' %}

_publications/vonmoll2023multi-agent.md

@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+---
+title: "Multi-Agent Risk-aware Teaming under Uncertainty (MARTY)"
+collection: publications
+permalink: /publication/vonmoll2023multi-agent
+date: 2023-12-01 01:00:00 +0500
+venue: 'Defense Technical Information Center'
+paperurl: 'https://avonmoll.github.io/files/marty.pdf'
+pubtype: 'whitepaper'
+authors: 'A. Von Moll, I. Weintraub'
+excerpt_separator: ""
+---
+Mission operations include a myriad of priorities that are subject to change in the field, of which four are commonly used by pilots: Signature Management (SM), Optimize Killing (OK), Weapon Engagement Zone Denial (WEZD), and Mutual Support (MS). The scope of this project includes three of these priorities, namely OK, WEZD, and MS in an effort to mature autonomy in these areas for unmanned platforms. Furthermore, the inclusion of uncertainty of sensor reliability, asset location, target location/strategy, and other factors are a focus of this effort. Air and missile threats in contested airspace represent a challenge for a number of Air Force missions [1]. In concert, some of the tasks include Defensive Counterair (DCA), Offensive Counterair (OCA), Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (ISR), Air Mobility Operations (AMO), Strike, and Interdiction. Although not comprehensive, these tasks are required for achieving air superiority to support and defend enemy or friendly airspace. As defined in JP 3-01 [2], in OCA, enemy Integrated Air Defense Systems (IADS) attempt to destroy, disrupt, or neutralize penetrations of their airspace. This is an attempt to degrade OCA operations. One way to address enemy IADS is through Suppression of Enemy Air Defense (SEAD). SEAD missions neutralize, destroy, or temporarily degrade surface-based enemy Air Defenses (ADs) by destructive or disruptive means.
+
+[Download paper here](https://avonmoll.github.io/files/marty.pdf)

bibliography.bib

@@ -1,3 +1,34 @@
+@techreport{vonmoll2023multi-agent,
+  abstract = {Mission operations include a myriad of priorities that are subject to change in the field, of which four are commonly used by pilots: Signature Management (SM), Optimize Killing (OK), Weapon Engagement Zone Denial (WEZD), and Mutual Support (MS). The scope of this project includes three of these priorities, namely OK, WEZD, and MS in an effort to mature autonomy in these areas for unmanned platforms. Furthermore, the inclusion of uncertainty of sensor reliability, asset location, target location/strategy, and other factors are a focus of this effort. Air and missile threats in contested airspace represent a challenge for a number of Air Force missions [1]. In concert, some of the tasks include Defensive Counterair (DCA), Offensive Counterair (OCA), Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (ISR), Air Mobility Operations (AMO), Strike, and Interdiction. Although not comprehensive, these tasks are required for achieving air superiority to support and defend enemy or friendly airspace. As defined in JP 3-01 [2], in OCA, enemy Integrated Air Defense Systems (IADS) attempt to destroy, disrupt, or neutralize penetrations of their airspace. This is an attempt to degrade OCA operations. One way to address enemy IADS is through Suppression of Enemy Air Defense (SEAD). SEAD missions neutralize, destroy, or temporarily degrade surface-based enemy Air Defenses (ADs) by destructive or disruptive means.},
+  author = {Von Moll, Alexander and Weintraub, Isaac},
+  date = {2023-12-01},
+  location = {None},
+  journal = {Defense Technical Information Center},
+  publisher = {Defense Technical Information Center},
+  title = {Multi-Agent Risk-aware Teaming under Uncertainty (MARTY)},
+  url = {https://avonmoll.github.io/files/marty.pdf},
+  year = {2023},
+}
+
+@book{lasota2013chaos,
+  author = {Lasota, Andrzej and Mackey, Michael C},
+  publisher = {Springer Science & Business Media},
+  title = {Chaos, fractals, and noise: stochastic aspects of dynamics},
+  volume = {97},
+  year = {2013},
+}
+
+@article{gerlach2023introduction,
+  abstract = {This document serves to provide and introduction to the Frobenius-Perron ("push-forward") and Koopman ("pull-back") operators. The terminology and mathematics required to understand and use these operators is foreign to most engineers. Thus, this tutorial tries to be explicit in defining and providing intuition to new mathematical concepts as they are introduced. Exercises with solutions are also provided so the reader can test their understanding.},
+  author = {Gerlach, Adam R.},
+  date = {2023-05-09},
+  location = {None},
+  journal = {None},
+  publisher = {None},
+  title = {An Introduction to the Frobenius-Perron and Koopman Operators},
+  year = {2023},
+}
+
 @inproceedings{vonmoll2024constrained,
   abstract = {In this paper, we extend existing turret defense differential game formulations involving a turn-constrained turret and mobile agent to include specified final time and a constraint. For the purposes of this analysis, the specified final time may represent some exogenous input, perhaps representing the time at which some other event will take place. As for the constraint, it represents a keep-out zone for the mobile agent. The scenario is formulated as a two-player, zero-sum differential game and solved via the method of characteristics (i.e., back-propagation of equilibrium trajectories). Three different trajectory types make up the solution: trajectories that end with the turret aligned with the mobile agent, trajectories that end with the mobile agent on the constraint boundary, and regular trajectories.},
   author = {Von Moll, Alexander and Gerlach, Adam R. and Bakker, Craig and Rupe, Adam and Pachter, Meir},

markdown_generator/publications.py

@@ -124,7 +124,8 @@ def parse_author(a):
     pubtypes = {"inproceedings": "conference",
                 "article": "journal",
                 "thesis": "academic",
-                "misc": "presentation"}
+                "misc": "presentation",
+                "techreport": "whitepaper"}
     md += "\npubtype: '" + pubtypes[item['ENTRYTYPE']] + "'"
 
 #     md += "\ncitation: '" + html_escape(item.citation) + "'"

mypubs.bib

@@ -1,3 +1,15 @@
+@techreport{vonmoll2023multi-agent,
+  abstract = {Mission operations include a myriad of priorities that are subject to change in the field, of which four are commonly used by pilots: Signature Management (SM), Optimize Killing (OK), Weapon Engagement Zone Denial (WEZD), and Mutual Support (MS). The scope of this project includes three of these priorities, namely OK, WEZD, and MS in an effort to mature autonomy in these areas for unmanned platforms. Furthermore, the inclusion of uncertainty of sensor reliability, asset location, target location/strategy, and other factors are a focus of this effort. Air and missile threats in contested airspace represent a challenge for a number of Air Force missions [1]. In concert, some of the tasks include Defensive Counterair (DCA), Offensive Counterair (OCA), Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (ISR), Air Mobility Operations (AMO), Strike, and Interdiction. Although not comprehensive, these tasks are required for achieving air superiority to support and defend enemy or friendly airspace. As defined in JP 3-01 [2], in OCA, enemy Integrated Air Defense Systems (IADS) attempt to destroy, disrupt, or neutralize penetrations of their airspace. This is an attempt to degrade OCA operations. One way to address enemy IADS is through Suppression of Enemy Air Defense (SEAD). SEAD missions neutralize, destroy, or temporarily degrade surface-based enemy Air Defenses (ADs) by destructive or disruptive means.},
+  author = {Von Moll, Alexander and Weintraub, Isaac},
+  date = {2023-12-01},
+  location = {None},
+  journal = {Defense Technical Information Center},
+  publisher = {Defense Technical Information Center},
+  title = {Multi-Agent Risk-aware Teaming under Uncertainty (MARTY)},
+  url = {https://avonmoll.github.io/files/marty.pdf},
+  year = {2023},
+}
+
 @inproceedings{vonmoll2024constrained,
   abstract = {In this paper, we extend existing turret defense differential game formulations involving a turn-constrained turret and mobile agent to include specified final time and a constraint. For the purposes of this analysis, the specified final time may represent some exogenous input, perhaps representing the time at which some other event will take place. As for the constraint, it represents a keep-out zone for the mobile agent. The scenario is formulated as a two-player, zero-sum differential game and solved via the method of characteristics (i.e., back-propagation of equilibrium trajectories). Three different trajectory types make up the solution: trajectories that end with the turret aligned with the mobile agent, trajectories that end with the mobile agent on the constraint boundary, and regular trajectories.},
   author = {Von Moll, Alexander and Gerlach, Adam R. and Bakker, Craig and Rupe, Adam and Pachter, Meir},