fix: change autoware_node from a static library to a shared library

[SakodaShintaro]

Description

This pull request fixes the following build error.

+ colcon build --symlink-install --cmake-args -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release --packages-select autoware_test_node
Starting >>> autoware_test_node
--- stderr: autoware_test_node                              
/usr/bin/ld: /home/shintarosakoda/autoware/install/autoware_node/lib/libautoware_node.a(node.cpp.o): warning: relocation against `g_rcutils_logging_initialized' in read-only section `.text'
/usr/bin/ld: /home/shintarosakoda/autoware/install/autoware_node/lib/libautoware_node.a(node.cpp.o): relocation R_X86_64_PC32 against symbol `_ZTVN8autoware4node4NodeE' can not be used when making a shared object。 -fPIC を付けて再コンパイルしてください。
/usr/bin/ld: 最終リンクに失敗しました: bad value
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
gmake[2]: *** [CMakeFiles/autoware_test_node.dir/build.make:196: libautoware_test_node.so] エラー 1
gmake[1]: *** [CMakeFiles/Makefile2:139: CMakeFiles/autoware_test_node.dir/all] エラー 2
gmake[1]: *** 未完了のジョブを待っています....
gmake: *** [Makefile:146: all] エラー 2
---
Failed   <<< autoware_test_node [3.61s, exited with code 2]

How was this PR tested?

I confirmed that I could build autoware successfully by using autoware-nightly.repos.

Notes for reviewers

None.

Interface changes

None.

Effects on system behavior

None.

[github-actions]

Thank you for contributing to the Autoware project!

🚧 If your pull request is in progress, switch it to draft mode.

Please ensure:

• You've checked our contribution guidelines.
• Your PR follows our pull request guidelines.
• All required CI checks pass before marking the PR ready for review.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 73.25%. Comparing base (e285c8b) to head (15c5a34).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #121   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   73.25%   73.25%           
=======================================
  Files          10       10           
  Lines         172      172           
  Branches       68       68           
=======================================
  Hits          126      126           
  Misses         19       19           
  Partials       27       27           

Flag	Coverage Δ		*Carryforward flag
differential	55.17% <ø> (?)
total	73.25% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from e285c8b

*This pull request uses carry forward flags. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[mitsudome-r]

Thanks for the fix!

[xmfcx]

@SakodaShintaro @kminoda @technolojin @mitsudome-r do you have any idea why this didn't fail on CI build-and-test-differential job or on my machine when I build and test it?