Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Vivek/7th jan bug fixes #161

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 8, 2025
Merged

Vivek/7th jan bug fixes #161

merged 2 commits into from
Jan 8, 2025

Conversation

vivek-athina
Copy link
Collaborator

@vivek-athina vivek-athina commented Jan 8, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Performance Improvements

    • Updated timing mechanism to use a higher resolution timer for more accurate execution time measurement
    • Added retry mechanism for API call timeout handling
  • Version Update

    • Bumped package version to 1.7.6

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 8, 2025

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces two primary changes: an improvement in the timing mechanism for API call execution in the search.py file and a version bump in the pyproject.toml. The modification in search.py replaces time.time() with time.perf_counter() for more precise timing measurements and adds a retry mechanism for timeout errors. The package version is incremented from 1.7.5 to 1.7.6.

Changes

File Change Summary
athina/steps/search.py Replaced time.time() with time.perf_counter() for more accurate timing. Added retry mechanism for API call timeouts (up to 2 attempts).
pyproject.toml Version updated from "1.7.5" to "1.7.6"

Poem

🕰️ A timer's tick, more precise and bright,
Measuring moments with quantum might!
Retries dance, errors take flight,
Version bumped, code shines so light 🐰
Rabbit's code, now swift and tight!


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ed39b71 and 58bfef3.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • athina/steps/search.py (1 hunks)
  • pyproject.toml (1 hunks)

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@vivek-athina vivek-athina merged commit b3c7b2f into main Jan 8, 2025
1 check failed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant