Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(tick): prune state on every message #49

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 30, 2024
Merged

Conversation

dtfiedler
Copy link
Collaborator

We can additional add the "distribute" logic to this so rewards are to be distributed at the nearest message. We will test this before we make that update.

We can additional add the "distribute" logic to this so rewards are to be distributed at the nearest message. We will test this before we make that update.
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Aug 30, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 78.72%. Comparing base (1310e84) to head (621ec02).
Report is 3 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop      #49      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    76.66%   78.72%   +2.06%     
===========================================
  Files            8        8              
  Lines         1521     1523       +2     
===========================================
+ Hits          1166     1199      +33     
+ Misses         355      324      -31     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@dtfiedler
Copy link
Collaborator Author

going to add a test that validates the prepend handler works as expected

@dtfiedler dtfiedler marked this pull request as ready for review August 30, 2024 17:57
@dtfiedler dtfiedler changed the title fix(tick): prune state at the beginning of epoch fix(tick): prune state on every message Aug 30, 2024
@dtfiedler dtfiedler merged commit e363e20 into develop Aug 30, 2024
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants