Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(database): exclude limitless suffix from Aurora PostgreSQL versions #84

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 4, 2024

Conversation

CuriousLearner
Copy link
Contributor

@CuriousLearner CuriousLearner commented Nov 4, 2024

This update excludes any Aurora PostgreSQL version with the limitless suffix from selection. Currently, the available versions are:

11.9    11.21   12.9    12.11   12.12   12.13   12.14   12.15   12.16   12.17   12.18       12.19   12.20   13.7    13.8    13.9    13.10   13.11   13.12   13.12   13.13       13.14   13.15   13.16   14.3    14.4    14.5    14.6    14.7    14.8    14.9        14.10   14.11   14.12   14.13   15.2    15.3    15.4    15.5    15.6    15.7        15.8    16.1    16.2    16.3    16.4    16.4-limitless

While 16.4-limitless is the latest version, it is only compatible with memory-optimized instance types and does not work with general-purpose instances like db.t4g.medium. This change ensures that a compatible version, such as 16.4, is selected instead of the limitless version by default.

Latest run here: https://github.com/apppackio/apppack/actions/runs/11672003987

@CuriousLearner CuriousLearner marked this pull request as ready for review November 4, 2024 21:11
@CuriousLearner CuriousLearner changed the title fix(database): Exclude limitless postgres aurora version fix(database): exclude limitless suffix from Aurora PostgreSQL versions Nov 4, 2024
@CuriousLearner CuriousLearner merged commit 5307825 into main Nov 4, 2024
3 of 4 checks passed
@CuriousLearner CuriousLearner deleted the exclude-rds-aurora-limitless-db-version branch November 4, 2024 21:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants