Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
infra: bump pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish from 1.10.2 to 1.12.2 (#42)
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history 
Bumps [pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish](https://github.com/pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish) from 1.10.2 to 1.12.2.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish/releases)
- [Commits](pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish@897895f...15c56db)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish
  dependency-type: direct:production
  update-type: version-update:semver-minor
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
  • Loading branch information
@dependabot
dependabot[bot] authored Dec 2, 2024
1 parent 7cdbbf6 commit ab2ac8b
Showing 1 changed file with 1 addition and 1 deletion.
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion .github/workflows/publish-to-pypi.yml
View file
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -26,6 +26,6 @@ jobs:
- name: Build a binary wheel and a source tarball
run: python setup.py sdist bdist_wheel
- name: Publish distribution to PyPI
uses: pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish@897895f1e160c830e369f9779632ebc134688e1b # release/v1
uses: pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish@15c56dba361d8335944d31a2ecd17d700fc7bcbc # release/v1
with:
password: ${{ secrets.pypi_token }}

1 comment on commit ab2ac8b

@github-actions
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Performance Alert ⚠️

Possible performance regression was detected for benchmark 'Python Benchmark with pytest-benchmark'.
Benchmark result of this commit is worse than the previous benchmark result exceeding threshold 2.

Benchmark suite Current: ab2ac8b Previous: 7cdbbf6 Ratio
benchmark/benchmark.py::test_exact_shots[ghz-density_matrix q[0], q[1]-8-braket_dm_v2] 112.48757152948274 iter/sec (stddev: 0) 261.3803433200027 iter/sec (stddev: 0) 2.32
benchmark/benchmark.py::test_exact_shots[ghz-variance y(q[0])-9-braket_sv] 43.126543655330956 iter/sec (stddev: 0) 99.64735200713938 iter/sec (stddev: 0) 2.31
benchmark/benchmark.py::test_exact_shots[ghz-variance y(q[0])-15-braket_sv_v2] 72.12181351221419 iter/sec (stddev: 0) 233.36098816592988 iter/sec (stddev: 0) 3.24
benchmark/benchmark.py::test_exact_shots[qft-density_matrix q[0], q[1]-7-braket_dm_v2] 98.47545616438241 iter/sec (stddev: 0) 225.5218270624314 iter/sec (stddev: 0) 2.29
benchmark/benchmark.py::test_exact_shots[qft-density_matrix q[0], q[1]-8-braket_dm_v2] 71.31942011260267 iter/sec (stddev: 0) 191.6501774044706 iter/sec (stddev: 0) 2.69
benchmark/benchmark.py::test_nonzero_shots[ghz-probability-100-7-braket_dm_v2] 84.45594997235695 iter/sec (stddev: 0) 222.09027098888302 iter/sec (stddev: 0) 2.63
benchmark/benchmark.py::test_nonzero_shots[ghz-variance y(q[0])-100-7-braket_dm_v2] 94.03843704503694 iter/sec (stddev: 0) 214.77051577062423 iter/sec (stddev: 0) 2.28
benchmark/benchmark.py::test_nonzero_shots[ghz-variance y(q[0])-100-12-braket_sv] 37.86219907257681 iter/sec (stddev: 0) 77.83915758603904 iter/sec (stddev: 0) 2.06
benchmark/benchmark.py::test_nonzero_shots[ghz-sample z(q[0])-100-7-braket_dm_v2] 107.7856391113928 iter/sec (stddev: 0) 217.34648372293103 iter/sec (stddev: 0) 2.02
benchmark/benchmark.py::test_nonzero_shots[qft-variance y(q[0])-100-7-braket_dm_v2] 74.92602852907528 iter/sec (stddev: 0) 165.3212492756487 iter/sec (stddev: 0) 2.21

This comment was automatically generated by workflow using github-action-benchmark.

Please sign in to comment.