Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix: (org-ql-view.el) Adjust priority for agenda elements #325

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

anpandey
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes #38.

@alphapapa
Copy link
Owner

Thanks for submitting this. I'll plan to merge it for v0.8.

@alphapapa alphapapa removed this from the 0.8 milestone Dec 16, 2023
@alphapapa alphapapa force-pushed the master branch 2 times, most recently from 059b10c to 77b4c2b Compare December 16, 2023 13:55
@larrasket
Copy link

@anpandey: I made a pull request into your repository that fixes the merge conflict. Merging it there should make the patch ready to merge here too.

@larrasket
Copy link

larrasket commented Jan 25, 2024 via email

@alphapapa
Copy link
Owner

Update: seems like even after syncing the branch with the upstream here, this patch no longer works (the entities are not sorted correctly).

Be sure you test in a clean Emacs configuration, e.g. using https://github.com/alphapapa/makem.sh (load up makem.el and call M-x makem, then use a sandbox configuration and the interactive rule to run the checked-out branch in a clean, sandboxed configuration.

@larrasket
Copy link

larrasket commented Feb 5, 2024 via email

@alphapapa
Copy link
Owner

It didn't work either when I tried that time. I tried now, after upgrading org version [now: Org mode version 9.6.17 (9.6.17-??-25c786f] it worked both in the sandbox and with my main configuration.

Ok, so it does work now, with the latest, rebased patch and the latest Org version?

@larrasket
Copy link

larrasket commented Feb 7, 2024 via email

@alphapapa
Copy link
Owner

@anpandey By the way, we're hoping to merge org-ql into Org mode, which means that FSF copyright assignment comes into play. AFAICT this patch plus your other one that was committed (i.e. not including comments) would be 12 lines, which is allowable without doing assignment. But it would be good to do the CA anyway. Have you done this already for Emacs/Org, or would you be willing to?

@anpandey
Copy link
Contributor Author

@alphapapa That's great news! I have not signed any CA before, but I can confirm my employer will allow it (as long as the assignment is to the FSF).

@alphapapa
Copy link
Owner

@alphapapa That's great news! I have not signed any CA before, but I can confirm my employer will allow it (as long as the assignment is to the FSF).

Great. You can send an email to [email protected] or to [email protected] to request the assignment form. Please let me know when you've submitted it and when you receive the confirmation (it usually takes a few weeks, depending on circumstances).

@anpandey
Copy link
Contributor Author

@alphapapa I've received the confirmation of the copyright assignment to the FSF.

@alphapapa
Copy link
Owner

@alphapapa I've received the confirmation of the copyright assignment to the FSF.

Thanks. I recently found out from Eli Zaretskii that I'm supposed to get confirmation of this directly from either the FSF clerk or an Emacs maintainer before accepting contributions. Would you be willing to ask the clerk to email confirmation to me directly?

@anpandey
Copy link
Contributor Author

No problem, I've asked the copyright clerk to email you the confirmation at the address on your profile.

@alphapapa
Copy link
Owner

Thanks.

@anpandey
Copy link
Contributor Author

@alphapapa You should have gotten a confirmation email from the FSF copyright clerk.

@alphapapa
Copy link
Owner

@alphapapa You should have gotten a confirmation email from the FSF copyright clerk.

@anpandey I'm not sure if I did. Anyway, Eli told me further that what I'm supposed to do is ask him or one of the other Emacs maintainers to verify that your name and email address are on their list. Would you please let me know exactly what name and address to ask him about? Thanks.

@anpandey
Copy link
Contributor Author

Sure, the name should be 'Ankit Raj Pandey', and the email '[email protected]'.

@larrasket
Copy link

@alphapapa any updates on merging that to master?

@alphapapa alphapapa removed the waiting label Oct 15, 2024
@alphapapa
Copy link
Owner

My time to work on Emacs packages is limited lately. I might be able to merge this this weekend.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Sorting by priorities broken in orq-ql-block
3 participants