Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Grammar fix: 'disable' instead of 'do not enable' #1885

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ottenhoff
Copy link

No description provided.

@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLAassistant commented Nov 7, 2023

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

@drawing
Copy link
Collaborator

drawing commented Nov 8, 2023

These modules are not enabled by default. Because of the error caused by explicitly enabling the module, is it better to prompt "Do not enable" than "Disable"?

@ottenhoff
Copy link
Author

I ran into the error after enabling the module. So "disabling" was the logical fix after enabling.

@drawing
Copy link
Collaborator

drawing commented Nov 9, 2023

I ran into the error after enabling the module. So "disabling" was the logical fix after enabling.

When using --enable-xxx to report an error, the error message should be to remove the --enable-xxx option, not to add the --disable-xxx option. So I think "do not enable" is better than "disable".

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants