feat: add newsletter #204
feat: add newsletter #204
Conversation
Add Newsletter service to support functionality for unfollowing newsletters Add Newsletter REST controller and routing Implement newsletter-related endpoints and methods in the User Service Create UnfollowRequest for the INewsletterService interface Add MyListNewsletterResponse to user's data fields Add newsletter validation Refactor JS components to support newsletter type and simplify recipient forms by moving logic to FormRecipient component Refactor window global constants to support newsletters Modify server to initialize and use the newsletter services Add UI component for listing newsletters Refactor existing components to use FormRecipient for recipient data input
feat(openapi.yaml): add newsletter support with new paths and schemas docs(readme.md): update API endpoints including newsletter and images fix(openapi.yaml): correct duplicated summary text for user my newsletters
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request primarily focus on enhancing the WhatsApp API and its associated documentation. The OpenAPI specification has been updated to version 4.3.0, introducing new endpoints and schemas for managing newsletters. The documentation has been improved to include support for ARM architecture and new features related to message handling. Additionally, several components in the frontend have been updated to utilize a new Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant NewsletterService
participant API
participant Database
User->>API: Request to unfollow newsletter
API->>NewsletterService: Call Unfollow method
NewsletterService->>Database: Validate and process unfollow request
Database-->>NewsletterService: Return success/error
NewsletterService-->>API: Return response
API-->>User: Return success/error response
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 28
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (37)
src/domains/newletter/newsletter.go (1)
9-11: LGTM: Struct definition is well-formedThe
UnfollowRequeststruct is well-defined with appropriate naming and correct tag formatting for both JSON and form serialization.Consider if
NewsletterIDshould be a more specific type thanstring. If the ID has a particular format or constraints, it might be beneficial to create a custom type for it. For example:type NewsletterID string type UnfollowRequest struct { NewsletterID NewsletterID `json:"newsletter_id" form:"newsletter_id"` }This could provide type safety and allow for method attachment if needed in the future.
src/validations/newsletter_validation.go (1)
11-19: LGTM with a suggestion: Consider additional validation for NewsletterID.The validation logic is concise and appropriate. It correctly uses the context and handles errors well. However, consider adding more specific validation for
NewsletterID. Depending on your requirements, you might want to validate its format (e.g., if it's expected to be a UUID or follow a specific pattern).Here's a suggestion to add more specific validation:
func ValidateUnfollowNewsletter(ctx context.Context, request domainNewsletter.UnfollowRequest) error { err := validation.ValidateStructWithContext(ctx, &request, - validation.Field(&request.NewsletterID, validation.Required), + validation.Field(&request.NewsletterID, validation.Required, validation.Length(36, 36).Error("must be a valid UUID")), ) if err != nil { return pkgError.ValidationError(err.Error()) } return nil }This assumes
NewsletterIDis a UUID. Adjust the validation as needed based on your specificNewsletterIDformat.src/internal/rest/newsletter.go (1)
13-17: LGTM: InitRestNewsletter function with a minor suggestion.The function is well-structured and correctly initializes the Newsletter instance. It also properly registers the route for the Unfollow endpoint.
Consider adding error handling for the route registration. While it's unlikely to fail, it's a good practice to handle potential errors. You could modify the function to return an error:
func InitRestNewsletter(app *fiber.App, service domainNewsletter.INewsletterService) (Newsletter, error) { rest := Newsletter{Service: service} if err := app.Post("/newsletter/unfollow", rest.Unfollow); err != nil { return Newsletter{}, fmt.Errorf("failed to register newsletter route: %w", err) } return rest, nil }src/services/newsletter.go (2)
11-13: Consider using a more descriptive field name.The struct definition looks good, but the field name
WaClicould be more descriptive. Consider renaming it toWhatsAppClientfor better clarity.Here's a suggested change:
type newsletterService struct { - WaCli *whatsmeow.Client + WhatsAppClient *whatsmeow.Client }
21-32: LGTM: Well-structured Unfollow method. Consider adding logging.The
Unfollowmethod is well-implemented with proper validation and error handling. To improve observability, consider adding logging at key points in the method.Here's a suggested enhancement with logging:
import ( + "log" // ... other imports ) func (service newsletterService) Unfollow(ctx context.Context, request domainNewsletter.UnfollowRequest) (err error) { + log.Printf("Attempting to unfollow newsletter: %s", request.NewsletterID) if err = validations.ValidateUnfollowNewsletter(ctx, request); err != nil { + log.Printf("Validation failed for newsletter unfollow: %v", err) return err } JID, err := whatsapp.ValidateJidWithLogin(service.WaCli, request.NewsletterID) if err != nil { + log.Printf("JID validation failed: %v", err) return err } + log.Printf("Unfollowing newsletter with JID: %s", JID) return service.WaCli.UnfollowNewsletter(JID) }src/views/components/generic/FormRecipient.js (1)
1-52: Overall assessment: Well-structured component with room for improvementsThe
FormRecipientcomponent is generally well-implemented, following Vue.js conventions and best practices. It provides a clear interface for selecting recipient types and entering phone/group IDs. However, there are a few areas where it could be improved:
- The
phone_idcomputation could be more robust to ensure uniqueness.- Recipient types could be moved to a configuration file or passed as a prop for better encapsulation and testability.
- The template could be simplified by removing the disabled
phone_idinput field.Addressing these points would enhance the component's maintainability, flexibility, and user experience.
Consider implementing the suggested improvements to make this component more robust and maintainable.
src/internal/rest/user.go (3)
20-20: LGTM! Consider grouping related endpoints.The new route for retrieving user newsletters is well-placed and follows the existing naming conventions. Good job!
Consider grouping related endpoints together for better organization. For example, you could move this new route next to the
/user/my/groupsendpoint, as they are both "my" routes:app.Get("/user/my/groups", rest.UserMyListGroups) app.Get("/user/my/newsletters", rest.UserMyListNewsletter)This grouping can improve code readability and maintenance.
85-95: LGTM! Consider improving error messages.The
UserMyListNewslettermethod is well-implemented and consistent with other methods in the file. Good job on maintaining consistency!Consider adding more specific error messages to improve debugging and user experience. For example:
response, err := controller.Service.MyListNewsletter(c.UserContext()) if err != nil { return c.Status(fiber.StatusInternalServerError).JSON(utils.ResponseData{ Status: fiber.StatusInternalServerError, Code: "ERROR", Message: fmt.Sprintf("Failed to retrieve newsletters: %v", err), }) } return c.JSON(utils.ResponseData{ Status: fiber.StatusOK, Code: "SUCCESS", Message: "Successfully retrieved user newsletters", Results: response, })This approach provides more detailed error information and uses appropriate HTTP status codes.
Newsletter Functionality Integration Requires Naming Correction
The newsletter functionality is properly integrated with the new route and handler. However, there are inconsistencies in the module naming, such as "newletter" instead of "newsletter," in several files:
src/internal/rest/newsletter.gosrc/services/newsletter.gosrc/validations/newsletter_validation.gosrc/domains/newletter/newsletter.goPlease update the module paths to ensure consistent naming across the codebase.
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-95: Summary: Newsletter functionality successfully implementedThe changes in this file effectively implement the new newsletter functionality by adding a new endpoint and its corresponding handler method. The implementation is consistent with existing patterns and coding style.
Key points:
- A new route
/user/my/newslettershas been added to theInitRestUserfunction.- The
UserMyListNewslettermethod has been implemented to handle the new route.- The changes maintain consistency with the existing codebase.
To ensure that the new functionality is properly integrated, please run the following verification script:
This script will help verify that the new functionality is properly integrated and that there are no inconsistencies in the implementation.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the integration of the new newsletter functionality # Test 1: Check if the new route is properly registered echo "Checking for the new route..." rg --type go 'app\.Get\("/user/my/newsletters",' src/internal/rest/user.go # Test 2: Verify the implementation of UserMyListNewsletter method echo "Verifying UserMyListNewsletter method..." rg --type go -A 10 'func \(controller \*User\) UserMyListNewsletter\(c \*fiber\.Ctx\) error' src/internal/rest/user.go # Test 3: Check for any references to newsletter functionality in other files echo "Checking for newsletter references in other files..." rg --type go 'Newsletter' src/Length of output: 3761
src/views/components/MessageRevoke.js (1)
Line range hint
1-97: Summary: Good improvements with some areas for refinement.Overall, the changes improve the component's structure by introducing the FormRecipient component and simplifying the template. However, there are a few areas that could benefit from further refinement:
- Consider a more robust approach for handling the initial and reset values of the 'type' property, reducing dependency on global variables.
- Add input validation for the
phone_idcomputed property to ensure type safety and prevent unexpected concatenation results.- Ensure consistency between the initial value setting and reset logic for the 'type' property.
Addressing these points will enhance the component's reliability and maintainability.
src/views/components/AccountUserInfo.js (3)
10-10: Consider using a constant or prop for TYPEUSERThe change from a hardcoded string to
window.TYPEUSERis an improvement in terms of consistency. However, relying on global variables can make the component less predictable and harder to test.Consider defining
TYPEUSERas a constant within the component or passing it as a prop:const TYPEUSER = 'user'; // Define at the top of the file export default { // ... props: { defaultType: { type: String, default: TYPEUSER } }, data() { return { type: this.defaultType, // ... } }, // ... }
23-23: Simplified phone_id computation, but consider input validationThe simplification of the
phone_idcomputed property improves readability. However, it assumes that boththis.phoneandthis.typeare always valid strings.Consider adding input validation to ensure robustness:
phone_id() { if (!this.phone || !this.type) { return ''; // or throw an error, depending on your use case } return `${this.phone}${this.type}`; }
60-60: Consistent reset of 'type', but consider using a constantThe update to
handleResetensures consistency with the initial state of thetypedata property. This is a good practice for maintaining component state.As mentioned earlier, consider using a constant or prop for
TYPEUSERinstead of relying on a global variable. This would make the reset more predictable and easier to maintain:handleReset() { // ... this.type = this.defaultType; // If using a prop // or this.type = TYPEUSER; // If using a constant }src/views/components/MessageDelete.js (2)
5-7: Component registration looks good, but consider avoiding global variables.The FormRecipient component is correctly registered in the components property. However, the use of
window.TYPEUSERintroduces a dependency on a global variable. Consider passing this value as a prop or using a more localized constant to improve maintainability and testability.You might want to refactor this to use a constant or prop:
import { TYPE_USER } from '@/constants'; export default { // ... data() { return { type: TYPE_USER, // ... } }, // ... }Also applies to: 10-10
82-83: Good use of FormRecipient component, consider improving readability.The replacement of custom input fields with the FormRecipient component is a good improvement for code reusability. The v-model directives are used correctly for two-way binding.
For better readability, consider placing each v-model directive on a new line:
<FormRecipient v-model:type="type" v-model:phone="phone" />src/views/components/AccountAvatar.js (3)
53-53: Consistent use of window.TYPEUSER, but consider alternativesThe use of
window.TYPEUSERin thehandleResetmethod is consistent with its usage in the data properties. However, this reinforces the earlier concern about relying on global variables.If you decide to refactor the
typeproperty as suggested earlier, remember to update this reset logic as well.
74-74: Good use of custom component and v-modelThe replacement of form inputs with the
FormRecipientcomponent is a good refactoring that likely improves code reusability and maintainability. The use ofv-modelfor two-way binding is correct and follows Vue 3 best practices.Minor suggestion: Consider using shorthand syntax for v-model when the property names match:
<FormRecipient v-model:type="type" v-model:phone="phone"/>Could be simplified to:
<FormRecipient v-model="{ type, phone }"/>This assumes that the
FormRecipientcomponent is set up to handle a single v-model with an object. If not, the current syntax is correct.
Line range hint
1-110: Overall good improvements, with some suggestions for further refinementThe changes to this component generally improve its structure and reusability. The introduction of the
FormRecipientcomponent and the simplification of some logic are positive steps. However, there are a few areas that could benefit from further refinement:
- Consider alternatives to using
window.TYPEUSER, such as props or a Vuex store, to improve testability and predictability.- Ensure that the simplification of the
phone_idcomputed property doesn't lose any necessary edge case handling.- Minor template improvements could be made as suggested in the previous comment.
These changes align well with the PR objectives of updating the UI to facilitate sending messages to a newsletter. However, to fully meet the objectives, ensure that:
- The
FormRecipientcomponent properly handles newsletter-specific inputs if required.- Any newsletter-specific logic is properly integrated into this component if necessary.
Please address the raised concerns and suggestions. Once done, this PR will be in good shape for merging.
src/views/components/SendLocation.js (2)
86-87: LGTM: FormRecipient component integrated correctly.The FormRecipient component is properly integrated into the template using v-model for two-way binding of 'type' and 'phone'. This change simplifies the template and is consistent with the earlier component registration.
Consider updating the component's documentation or comments to reflect the usage of the new FormRecipient component and its purpose.
Line range hint
1-114: Summary of SendLocation.js changesThe changes to this component generally improve its structure and reusability by introducing the FormRecipient component. However, there are a few points that require attention:
- The use of 'window.TYPEUSER' introduces a dependency on a global variable, which could be improved.
- The simplification of the 'phone_id' computed property removes type-specific logic, which needs clarification.
- The template has been successfully updated to use the new FormRecipient component.
Please address the concerns raised in the individual comments, particularly regarding the use of global variables and the potential impact of the 'phone_id' computation change.
Consider refactoring the component to reduce reliance on global variables and improve its testability. This could involve using props, constants, or a more robust state management solution if appropriate for your application architecture.
src/views/components/SendContact.js (2)
19-19: Consider adding validation for phone_id components.The simplified
phone_idcomputed property is more concise, but it lacks validation. Consider adding checks to ensure thatthis.phoneandthis.typeare non-empty and in the correct format before concatenation. This will help prevent potential issues with invalidphone_idvalues.Example:
phone_id() { if (!this.phone || !this.type) { console.warn('Invalid phone or type'); return ''; } return this.phone + this.type; }
88-89: LGTM: FormRecipient integration, consider adding validation.The integration of the
FormRecipientcomponent simplifies the template and improves code organization. The use ofv-modelfor two-way binding is correct.Consider adding:
- Validation for the
FormRecipientinput (if not already handled internally).- Error handling and display for invalid input.
- A comment explaining the purpose and expected props/events of
FormRecipient.Example:
<FormRecipient v-model:type="type" v-model:phone="phone" @validation-error="handleValidationError" /> <!-- Display validation errors --> <div v-if="validationError" class="ui error message">{{ validationError }}</div>src/views/components/SendMessage.js (2)
65-65: Consistent use of global variable, but consider alternativesThe change to reset
this.typetowindow.TYPEUSERis consistent with the earlier modification to thetypedata property. However, this reinforces the dependency on a global variable.Consider defining
TYPEUSERas a constant within the component or in a separate configuration file that can be imported. This would improve encapsulation and make the component easier to test and maintain.
Line range hint
1-114: Overall: Good improvements with some areas for further refinementThe changes to the SendMessage component generally improve code organization and modularity, particularly with the introduction of the FormRecipient component. However, there are a few areas that could be further refined:
- Consider encapsulating the
TYPEUSERvalue within the component or a configuration file rather than relying on a global variable.- Enhance type safety in the
phone_idcomputed property to ensure correct formatting.- Verify the implementation of the FormRecipient component to ensure it handles the 'type' and 'phone' inputs correctly.
These refinements would further improve the component's maintainability and robustness.
src/services/user.go (1)
130-142: LGTM! The implementation looks good overall.The
MyListNewslettermethod is well-structured and consistent with other methods in the file. It correctly retrieves the list of subscribed newsletters and handles potential errors.Consider removing or replacing the
fmt.Printfstatement.The
fmt.Printfstatement on line 137 is likely used for debugging purposes. In production code, it's generally better to use a proper logging system.Consider replacing it with a logging statement or removing it entirely if it's no longer needed:
- fmt.Printf("%+v\n", datas) + // log.Debug("Retrieved subscribed newsletters", "data", datas)Add a comment explaining the purpose of the method.
To improve code readability and maintainability, consider adding a brief comment explaining the purpose of the
MyListNewslettermethod.Add a comment like this:
+// MyListNewsletter retrieves a list of newsletters that the user is subscribed to. func (service userService) MyListNewsletter(_ context.Context) (response domainUser.MyListNewsletterResponse, err error) {src/views/components/SendPoll.js (1)
95-96: LGTM: FormRecipient integration with minor formatting suggestionThe integration of the
FormRecipientcomponent simplifies the template and encapsulates recipient selection logic. The use ofv-modelfor two-way data binding is correct.Consider removing the empty line after the
FormRecipientcomponent for consistency:- <FormRecipient v-model:type="type" v-model:phone="phone"/> - + <FormRecipient v-model:type="type" v-model:phone="phone"/> <div class="field">src/views/index.html (1)
89-96: LGTM! Consider adding a comment for clarity.The addition of the Newsletter section aligns well with the PR objectives and maintains consistency with the existing structure. Good use of the grid layout for responsiveness.
Consider adding a comment above the
<newsletter-list>component to briefly describe its purpose, similar to other sections in the file. For example:<!-- Newsletter list component --> <newsletter-list></newsletter-list>readme.md (4)
Line range hint
9-14: Great addition of ARM architecture support!The inclusion of ARM64 support for Linux is a valuable feature that broadens the project's compatibility. The direct links to the release and Docker image are helpful for users.
Consider adding a brief note about the performance benefits or use cases for ARM architecture to provide more context for users unfamiliar with the differences between architectures.
Line range hint
16-38: Comprehensive update to the feature listThe expanded feature list provides valuable information about the project's capabilities. The addition of webhook secret and auto-reply functionality, along with detailed command-line examples, enhances the documentation's usefulness for developers.
For consistency, consider using the same format for all command-line examples. For instance, the
--basic-authexample uses a different format compared to others. Standardizing the format would improve readability.
115-116: API endpoints updated to reflect new featuresThe renaming of "User My Group List" to "User My Groups" improves clarity. The addition of the "User My Newsletter" endpoint aligns well with the new newsletter functionality mentioned in the PR objectives.
Consider adding a brief description of the "User My Newsletter" endpoint's functionality to provide more context for users. This would be consistent with the level of detail provided for other endpoints.
150-150: User Interface section updated with new featuresThe update to the homepage image link and the addition of the "My Newsletter" entry in the UI table accurately reflect the changes made to the application's interface.
For consistency with other entries in the UI table, consider adding a brief description of the "My Newsletter" functionality next to its image link. This would provide users with a quick overview of what to expect from this new feature.
Also applies to: 172-172
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[style] ~150-~150: Using many exclamation marks might seem excessive (in this case: 27 exclamation marks for a text that’s 8297 characters long)
Context: ...---------------| | Homepage || | Login |
| | Login With Code |
| | Send Message |
| | Send Image |
| | Send File |
| | Send Video |
| | Send Contact |
| | Send Location |
| | Send Audio |
| | Send Poll |
| | Revoke Message |
| | Delete Message |
| | Reaction Message |
| | Edit Message |
| | User Info |
| | User Avatar |
| | My Privacy |
| | My Group |
| | Auto Reply |
| | Basic Auth Prompt |
| | Manage Participant |
| | My Newsletter | 
src/pkg/whatsapp/whatsapp.go (1)
111-122: Improved error handling and readability. Consider a small enhancement.The refactoring of the
ParseJIDfunction has significantly improved its readability and error handling. The use oftypes.ParseJIDfor parsing and the centralized error handling are good improvements.Consider combining the error messages for better consistency:
if err != nil { - fmt.Printf("invalid JID %s: %v", arg, err) return recipient, pkgError.ErrInvalidJID } if recipient.User == "" { - fmt.Printf("invalid JID %v: no server specified", arg) - return recipient, pkgError.ErrInvalidJID + return recipient, fmt.Errorf("invalid JID %s: no server specified", arg) }This change would provide more consistent error handling and improve the function's maintainability.
docs/openapi.yaml (1)
1643-1643: Add a newline character at the end of the file.To adhere to common coding standards and resolve the yamllint warning, please add a newline character at the end of the file.
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 1643-1643: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
src/views/components/SendFile.js (1)
24-24: Include a delimiter when concatenatingphoneandtypeinphone_idConcatenating
this.phoneandthis.typewithout a delimiter may result in ambiguousphone_idvalues. Adding a delimiter improves clarity and prevents potential conflicts.Proposed change:
-return this.phone + this.type; +return `${this.phone}-${this.type}`;src/views/components/NewsletterList.js (2)
20-22: Check if DataTable exists before destroying it.Calling
destroy()on an uninitialized DataTable can lead to errors. Ensure that the DataTable instance exists before attempting to destroy it in thedtClearmethod.Apply this diff to add a check:
dtClear() { - $('#account_newsletters_table').DataTable().destroy(); + if ($.fn.DataTable.isDataTable('#account_newsletters_table')) { + $('#account_newsletters_table').DataTable().destroy(); + } },
58-66: Handle errors more gracefully in 'submitApi' method.When an error occurs, consider displaying a user-friendly message or handling specific HTTP status codes to provide better feedback.
src/views/components/SendImage.js (1)
21-21: Use a separator when concatenatingphoneandtypeinphone_idConcatenating
this.phoneandthis.typewithout a separator may lead to ambiguousphone_idvalues whenphoneortypecontain overlapping values. Consider adding a separator to avoid potential collisions.Apply this diff to include a separator:
computed: { phone_id() { - return this.phone + this.type; + return `${this.phone}-${this.type}`; } },
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (29)
- docs/openapi.yaml (5 hunks)
- readme.md (4 hunks)
- src/cmd/root.go (1 hunks)
- src/domains/newletter/newsletter.go (1 hunks)
- src/domains/user/account.go (1 hunks)
- src/domains/user/user.go (1 hunks)
- src/internal/rest/newsletter.go (1 hunks)
- src/internal/rest/user.go (2 hunks)
- src/pkg/whatsapp/whatsapp.go (1 hunks)
- src/services/newsletter.go (1 hunks)
- src/services/user.go (1 hunks)
- src/validations/newsletter_validation.go (1 hunks)
- src/views/components/AccountAvatar.js (4 hunks)
- src/views/components/AccountUserInfo.js (4 hunks)
- src/views/components/MessageDelete.js (3 hunks)
- src/views/components/MessageReact.js (4 hunks)
- src/views/components/MessageRevoke.js (3 hunks)
- src/views/components/MessageUpdate.js (4 hunks)
- src/views/components/NewsletterList.js (1 hunks)
- src/views/components/SendAudio.js (3 hunks)
- src/views/components/SendContact.js (4 hunks)
- src/views/components/SendFile.js (4 hunks)
- src/views/components/SendImage.js (3 hunks)
- src/views/components/SendLocation.js (4 hunks)
- src/views/components/SendMessage.js (4 hunks)
- src/views/components/SendPoll.js (4 hunks)
- src/views/components/SendVideo.js (4 hunks)
- src/views/components/generic/FormRecipient.js (1 hunks)
- src/views/index.html (5 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 yamllint
docs/openapi.yaml
[error] 1643-1643: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
🪛 LanguageTool
readme.md
[style] ~150-~150: Using many exclamation marks might seem excessive (in this case: 27 exclamation marks for a text that’s 8297 characters long)
Context: ...---------------| | Homepage |(EN_EXCESSIVE_EXCLAMATION)
🔇 Additional comments (69)
src/domains/newletter/newsletter.go (1)
3-3: LGTM: Imports are correctThe import of the "context" package is appropriate and necessary for the usage of
context.Contextin the interface method.src/validations/newsletter_validation.go (2)
3-8: LGTM: Imports are appropriate and well-organized.The imports are relevant to the function's purpose and follow Go best practices. The use of aliased imports for custom packages enhances readability.
10-10: LGTM: Function signature is well-designed.The function name
ValidateUnfollowNewsletterclearly describes its purpose. The use ofcontext.Contextand a domain-specific request struct as parameters, along with anerrorreturn type, is appropriate for a validation function.src/internal/rest/newsletter.go (2)
9-11: LGTM: Newsletter struct definition.The Newsletter struct is well-defined with a single field of type
domainNewsletter.INewsletterService. This design allows for easy dependency injection and facilitates unit testing.
1-32: LGTM: Overall file structure and organization.The file is well-structured and follows Go best practices:
- Clear package declaration and relevant imports.
- Consistent naming conventions.
- Focused on a single responsibility (newsletter operations).
- Good separation of concerns between the REST handler and the service layer.
The code is readable and maintainable. Good job on the overall organization!
src/services/newsletter.go (2)
1-9: LGTM: Package declaration and imports are appropriate.The package name and imports are well-structured and relevant to the newsletter functionality being implemented.
15-19: LGTM: Constructor function is well-implemented.The
NewNewsletterServicefunction follows good practices:
- It uses the factory pattern.
- It correctly initializes the struct.
- It returns an interface, allowing for better abstraction and testability.
src/views/components/generic/FormRecipient.js (2)
1-12: LGTM: Component definition and props are well-structured.The component name is descriptive, and the props are correctly defined with appropriate types and required flags. This follows Vue.js best practices.
30-37: LGTM: Methods are concise and follow Vue.js conventions.The
updateTypeandupdatePhonemethods are well-implemented, using the recommended$emitapproach for updating props in the parent component.src/views/components/MessageRevoke.js (3)
1-1: LGTM: FormRecipient import added correctly.The import statement for the FormRecipient component is properly formatted and uses a relative path, which is appropriate for importing a local component.
5-7: LGTM: FormRecipient component registered correctly.The FormRecipient component is properly registered in the components object, allowing it to be used in the template.
79-80: LGTM: FormRecipient component integrated correctly in the template.The FormRecipient component is properly integrated into the template with correct v-model directives for two-way binding of 'type' and 'phone'. This simplifies the form structure and is consistent with the component registration and import.
src/views/components/AccountUserInfo.js (2)
1-1: LGTM: Improved modularity with FormRecipient componentThe addition of the FormRecipient component and its proper registration enhance the modularity of the code. This change aligns well with Vue.js best practices for component-based architecture.
Also applies to: 5-7
82-82: Excellent use of FormRecipient componentThe replacement of separate input fields with the
FormRecipientcomponent significantly improves code reusability and maintainability. The use ofv-modelfor two-way binding oftypeandphoneis aligned with Vue.js best practices.This change enhances the overall structure of the component and makes it easier to manage user input consistently across the application.
src/views/components/MessageDelete.js (1)
1-1: LGTM: FormRecipient import added correctly.The import statement for the new FormRecipient component is well-formatted and follows Vue.js best practices for component naming and relative imports.
src/views/components/AccountAvatar.js (2)
1-1: LGTM: Good use of component-based architectureThe import and registration of the
FormRecipientcomponent demonstrate good use of Vue.js component-based architecture. This refactoring likely improves code reusability and maintainability.Also applies to: 5-7
20-20: Simplified phone_id computation looks good, but please clarifyThe simplification of the
phone_idcomputed property makes the code more readable. However, the previous implementation might have contained important logic that is now removed.Could you please clarify:
- Is it always safe to directly concatenate
this.phoneandthis.type?- Were there any edge cases handled by the previous implementation that we need to consider?
src/views/components/SendLocation.js (3)
1-1: LGTM: FormRecipient import added correctly.The import statement for the new FormRecipient component is correctly formatted and follows Vue.js best practices.
5-7: LGTM: FormRecipient component registered correctly.The FormRecipient component is properly registered in the components property, following Vue.js best practices for component registration.
19-19:⚠️ Potential issuePlease clarify the changes to phone_id computation.
The 'phone_id' computed property has been simplified to directly concatenate 'this.phone' with 'this.type'. This change removes the previous conditional logic for 'user' and 'group' types. Please address the following points:
- Confirm that 'this.type' will always be a string suitable for direct concatenation.
- Explain why the type-specific logic (user vs. group) was removed and if this change affects the functionality elsewhere in the application.
- Ensure that this change doesn't break any existing features or API calls that might depend on the previous format of 'phone_id'.
To help verify the impact of this change, you can run the following script:
src/views/components/SendContact.js (4)
1-1: LGTM: FormRecipient component imported and registered correctly.The import statement and component registration for
FormRecipientare implemented correctly. This change aligns with the introduction of the newFormRecipientcomponent mentioned in the PR summary.Also applies to: 5-7
66-66: LGTM: Consistent reset of type property.The reset of
this.typetowindow.TYPEUSERin thehandleResetmethod is consistent with its initialization in thedatafunction. This ensures that thetypeproperty is properly reset when the form is cleared.
Line range hint
1-114: Overall: Good improvements, minor enhancements suggested.The changes to the
SendContactcomponent, including the introduction of theFormRecipientcomponent, align well with the PR objectives. The code organization has improved, and the component is now more flexible.Key points:
- The
FormRecipientcomponent is correctly imported and integrated.- The use of
window.TYPEUSERadds flexibility but requires clarification.- The
phone_idcomputed property andhandleResetmethod have been simplified.- The template is cleaner with the
FormRecipientcomponent.Suggestions for further improvement:
- Add documentation for
window.TYPEUSER.- Implement validation for
phone_idcomponents.- Enhance error handling and validation for
FormRecipient.Overall, these changes represent a positive step in improving the codebase.
10-10: Approve change, but clarifywindow.TYPEUSER.The use of
window.TYPEUSERinstead of a hardcoded string makes the component more flexible. However, please clarify:
- Where is
window.TYPEUSERdefined?- What are its possible values?
- Is there a fallback if
window.TYPEUSERis undefined?Consider adding a comment explaining the purpose and possible values of
window.TYPEUSER.To verify the usage and definition of
window.TYPEUSER, please run:✅ Verification successful
Verification of
window.TYPEUSERUsage CompletedThe
window.TYPEUSERis defined insrc/views/index.htmlaswindow.TYPEUSER = "@s.whatsapp.net";and is consistently used across components without issues.
- Definition located in
src/views/index.html.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the definition and usage of window.TYPEUSER rg -i 'window\.TYPEUSER'Length of output: 2275
src/views/components/SendMessage.js (4)
1-1: LGTM: Improved component modularityThe import and registration of the
FormRecipientcomponent align with Vue.js best practices. This change enhances the modularity of the code by separating the recipient form logic into its own component.Also applies to: 5-7
19-19: Clarify 'type' values and consider adding a safeguardThe simplified
phone_idcomputation assumes thatthis.typealready contains the appropriate suffix (e.g., @c.us or @g.us). This change could potentially introduce bugs ifthis.typedoesn't contain the expected value.Please clarify the possible values of
this.typeand consider adding a safeguard to ensure the correct format. For example:phone_id() { const validTypes = ['@c.us', '@g.us']; const type = validTypes.includes(this.type) ? this.type : '@c.us'; return this.phone + type; }To verify the usage of
this.type:#!/bin/bash # Search for assignments to 'this.type' or the 'type' data property rg --type js 'this\.type\s*=|type:\s*'
88-88: LGTM: Improved form structure with FormRecipient componentThe replacement of separate form fields with the
FormRecipientcomponent simplifies the template and improves code organization. The use ofv-modelfor two-way binding is appropriate and follows Vue.js best practices.To ensure the
FormRecipientcomponent is implemented correctly, please verify its structure and props:#!/bin/bash # Search for the FormRecipient component definition rg --type js 'export default\s*{\s*name:\s*[\'"]FormRecipient[\'"]' -A 20
10-10: Verify global variable usage and consider alternativesThe change from a hardcoded string to
window.TYPEUSERintroduces a dependency on a global variable. While this might improve flexibility, it could also make the component less self-contained and harder to test.Please ensure that
window.TYPEUSERis properly defined and consider if this value could be passed as a prop or managed through a state management solution like Vuex for better encapsulation.src/services/user.go (1)
130-143: Summary: New method added to retrieve subscribed newslettersThe addition of the
MyListNewslettermethod enhances theuserServiceby providing functionality to retrieve a list of newsletters that the user is subscribed to. This aligns well with the PR objective of introducing newsletter-related features.The method is implemented consistently with existing patterns in the file, ensuring proper authentication and error handling. It integrates smoothly with the existing codebase and expands the service's capabilities.
To further improve the code:
- Consider adding error wrapping to provide more context if an error occurs.
- Evaluate if any unit tests should be added or updated to cover this new functionality.
- Ensure that the
domainUser.MyListNewsletterResponsetype is properly defined to handle the newsletter data.Overall, this change effectively implements the required functionality for retrieving subscribed newsletters.
To ensure the
MyListNewsletterResponsetype is properly defined, let's check its definition:✅ Verification successful
Verification Complete:
MyListNewsletterResponsetype is properly definedThe
MyListNewsletterResponsetype is correctly defined insrc/domains/user/account.gowith theData []types.NewsletterMetadatafield. This ensures that theMyListNewslettermethod accurately populates the response.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the definition of MyListNewsletterResponse type # Test: Search for the type definition rg --type go -A 5 'type MyListNewsletterResponse struct'Length of output: 230
src/views/components/SendPoll.js (4)
2-8: LGTM: FormRecipient component integrationThe
FormRecipientcomponent is correctly imported and registered. This change aligns with the PR objective of updating the UI to facilitate sending messages to a newsletter.
64-64: LGTM: Consistent reset of type propertyThe
handleResetmethod now resetsthis.typetowindow.TYPEUSER, which is consistent with the earlier change in the data property. This ensures that the component returns to a consistent initial state after reset.
21-21: Request clarification on phone_id computation changeThe
phone_idcomputed property has been simplified to concatenatethis.phonewiththis.type. While this makes the code cleaner, could you please clarify if this change maintains all the previous functionality? Specifically, does it handle both user and group scenarios correctly?To verify the usage of
phone_idin the codebase, please run the following script:#!/bin/bash # Search for usage of phone_id in the codebase rg --type js -e 'phone_id' -C 3
12-12: Approve change and request clarification on window.TYPEUSERThe use of
window.TYPEUSERinstead of a hardcoded string makes the component more flexible. However, it would be helpful to understand wherewindow.TYPEUSERis defined and what other possible values it might have.To verify the usage and definition of
window.TYPEUSER, please run the following script:src/views/components/SendVideo.js (5)
1-1: LGTM: FormRecipient component imported and registered correctly.The import of
FormRecipientand its registration as a component are implemented correctly. This change aligns with the PR objective of updating the UI to facilitate sending messages to a newsletter.Also applies to: 5-7
73-73: LGTM: Consistent reset oftypeproperty.The change in the
handleResetmethod to setthis.type = window.TYPEUSERis consistent with the initialization in the data function. This ensures that thetypeproperty is correctly reset to its default value when the form is reset.Note: This change is related to the earlier comment about verifying the existence and reliability of
window.TYPEUSER. Once that is confirmed, this change can be fully approved.
Line range hint
1-145: Summary of SendVideo.js changesThe changes to the SendVideo component align well with the PR objectives of updating the UI for sending messages to a newsletter. Key points:
- The
FormRecipientcomponent has been successfully integrated, simplifying the UI code.- The use of
window.TYPEUSERintroduces a dependency on a global variable that needs verification.- The
phone_idcomputed property has been simplified, which may have implications on how phone numbers are processed.Follow-up actions:
- Verify the existence and consistency of
window.TYPEUSERacross the application.- Clarify the implications of the simplified
phone_idcomputed property.- Confirm that the
FormRecipientcomponent's interface meets all the requirements previously handled by custom input fields.Once these points are addressed, the changes can be fully approved.
27-27: Clarify the simplification of thephone_idcomputed property.The
phone_idcomputed property has been simplified to directly concatenatethis.phoneandthis.type. While this change reduces complexity, it assumes thatthis.typewill always be a valid suffix for the phone number. Could you please clarify:
- Is this simplification intentional and safe for all possible values of
this.type?- Were there any edge cases handled by the previous implementation that need to be considered?
This change might impact how phone numbers are processed throughout the application, so it's crucial to ensure it's correct and consistent with the intended behavior.
To understand the impact of this change, please run the following script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Analyze the usage of phone_id in the codebase # Test 1: Search for other occurrences of phone_id echo "Searching for other occurrences of phone_id:" rg --type js "phone_id" -g '!**/dist/**' # Test 2: Search for places where phone and type are used together echo "\nSearching for places where phone and type are used together:" rg --type js "phone.*type|type.*phone" -g '!**/dist/**'
99-100: LGTM: FormRecipient component integrated correctly.The integration of the
FormRecipientcomponent in the template is implemented correctly, using v-model for two-way binding oftypeandphoneproperties. This change simplifies the template and aligns with the component registration and import changes.To ensure full compatibility:
- Verify that the
FormRecipientcomponent's interface matches the expected usage here.- Confirm that it handles all the functionality previously managed by the custom input fields.
To verify the
FormRecipientcomponent's interface and usage, please run the following script:#!/bin/bash # Description: Analyze the FormRecipient component # Test 1: Check the FormRecipient component definition echo "Checking the FormRecipient component definition:" ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern $'export default { name: "FormRecipient", $$$ }' # Test 2: Search for other usages of FormRecipient echo "\nSearching for other usages of FormRecipient:" rg --type js "FormRecipient" -g '!**/dist/**'src/cmd/root.go (3)
116-116: LGTM: Newsletter service initialization added correctly.The
newsletterServiceis initialized consistently with other services, using the existingcliobject. This addition is well-placed and follows the established pattern in the codebase.
124-124: LGTM: Newsletter REST endpoint initialization added correctly.The
InitRestNewsletterfunction is called with the appropriateappandnewsletterServiceparameters, consistent with other REST endpoint initializations. This addition is well-placed and follows the established pattern in the codebase.
116-124: Overall changes look good, consider verifying related implementations.The additions for the newsletter functionality are well-integrated into the existing code structure. They follow established patterns and don't disrupt the current flow. However, it would be beneficial to verify the implementations of
NewNewsletterServicein the services package andInitRestNewsletterin the rest package to ensure they meet the requirements of the new newsletter feature.To verify the implementations, you can run the following commands:
✅ Verification successful
Verified the implementation of Newsletter functionality.
BothNewNewsletterServiceandInitRestNewsletterfunctions are present and correctly implemented in their respective files.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify the implementation of NewNewsletterService echo "Checking NewNewsletterService implementation:" rg --type go "func NewNewsletterService" src/services # Verify the implementation of InitRestNewsletter echo "Checking InitRestNewsletter implementation:" rg --type go "func InitRestNewsletter" src/internal/restLength of output: 558
src/views/index.html (3)
132-132: LGTM! Improved flexibility for different deployment scenarios.The update to the axios baseURL is a good improvement. It now correctly handles cases where the application might be deployed on different ports. The use of template literals also enhances readability.
162-162: LGTM! Consistent implementation of the NewsletterList component.The import and registration of the NewsletterList component are implemented correctly and consistently with other components in the file. This aligns well with the PR objective of adding newsletter functionality.
Also applies to: 189-189
109-111: Approve with suggestions for improvement.The updates to
TYPEGROUPandTYPEUSER, and the addition ofTYPENEWSLETTERare consistent with the new functionality. However, consider the following suggestions:
- The changes to existing variables might affect other parts of the application. Ensure all usages are updated accordingly.
- Consider moving these constants to a separate configuration file for better maintainability.
- Instead of using global variables on the window object, consider using a module pattern or constants in a Vue component.
To verify the impact of these changes, please run the following script:
✅ Verification successful
Verification Successful.
All usages of
TYPEGROUPandTYPEUSERhave been updated with the "@" prefix. No issues were found.However, consider the following suggestions for improvement:
- Maintainability: Move these constants to a separate configuration file for better organization.
- Encapsulation: Instead of using global variables on the window object, consider adopting a module pattern or defining constants within a Vue component.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for usages of TYPEGROUP and TYPEUSER in the codebase echo "Searching for TYPEGROUP usages:" rg "TYPEGROUP" --type js --type html echo "\nSearching for TYPEUSER usages:" rg "TYPEUSER" --type js --type html # Check if there are any usages without the @ prefix echo "\nChecking for potential issues (usages without @ prefix):" rg "TYPEGROUP\s*=\s*[\"']g\.us[\"']" --type js --type html rg "TYPEUSER\s*=\s*[\"']s\.whatsapp\.net[\"']" --type js --type htmlLength of output: 3003
docs/openapi.yaml (7)
4-4: Version update looks good.The OpenAPI specification version has been correctly updated from 4.2.0 to 4.3.0, which is appropriate given the addition of new features and modifications to existing endpoints and schemas.
19-20: New newsletter tag added correctly.The addition of the "newsletter" tag is appropriate for the new newsletter functionality being introduced. This will help organize and categorize the new endpoints related to newsletters.
217-228: Updated response schema for/user/my/groupsendpoint.The response schema for the
/user/my/groupsendpoint has been updated to use theUserGroupResponseschema. This change improves consistency and provides a more detailed structure for the group information.
229-241: New endpoint added for retrieving user's newsletters.The
/user/my/newslettersendpoint has been added to allow users to retrieve their list of newsletters. The endpoint is well-defined with appropriate tags, summary, and response schemas.
1072-1105: New endpoint added for unfollowing a newsletter.The
/newsletter/unfollowendpoint has been added to allow users to unfollow a newsletter. The endpoint is well-defined with appropriate tags, summary, request body, and response schemas.
1406-1643: New schemas added for newsletter and group functionality.The following new schemas have been added:
NewsletterResponse: Defines the structure for the newsletter list response.Newsletter: Provides detailed properties for a newsletter.GroupResponse: Defines the structure for the group list response.Group: Provides detailed properties for a group.Participant: Defines the structure for a group participant.These schemas are well-structured and provide comprehensive information for the new newsletter functionality and improved group information. The addition of these schemas enhances the API's clarity and consistency.
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 1643-1643: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
Line range hint
1-1643: Overall, the OpenAPI specification updates are well-implemented.The changes to the
docs/openapi.yamlfile effectively introduce the new newsletter functionality and improve the group information structure. The updates include:
- Version bump from 4.2.0 to 4.3.0
- Addition of a new "newsletter" tag
- New endpoints for retrieving newsletters and unfollowing newsletters
- Updated response schema for the
/user/my/groupsendpoint- New schemas for
NewsletterResponse,Newsletter,GroupResponse,Group, andParticipantThese changes are consistent, well-structured, and provide clear documentation for the API's new features. The only minor improvement needed is adding a newline character at the end of the file.
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 1643-1643: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
src/views/components/SendAudio.js (4)
1-1: Import statement correctly addsFormRecipientcomponentThe
FormRecipientcomponent is correctly imported to be used within this component.
5-7: RegisteringFormRecipientin the components listThe
FormRecipientcomponent is appropriately registered in thecomponentsproperty.
57-57: Ensurewindow.TYPEUSERis defined and accessibleAs previously mentioned, verify that
window.TYPEUSERis defined to avoid potential issues.
17-17: Confirm the format ofphone_idwhen concatenatingthis.phoneandthis.typeThe
phone_idcomputed property now returnsthis.phone + this.type. Ensure that this concatenation produces the correct format expected by the API. If a delimiter is required betweenphoneandtype, consider adding it (e.g.,this.phone + '_' + this.type) to prevent potential issues with how thephone_idis parsed on the server side.Run the following script to verify:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for where `phone_id` is used to determine if a delimiter is needed. # Test: Investigate usage of `phone_id` in API calls and ensure correct format. rg --type js 'phone_id'src/views/components/MessageReact.js (2)
19-19: Confirm the concatenation logic inphone_id()In
phone_id(), concatenatingthis.phoneandthis.typewithreturn this.phone + this.typemay lead to ambiguous identifiers ifthis.phoneandthis.typeare not distinctly separable. Ensure that this concatenation produces a unique and unambiguous identifier for the backend API.
10-10: Ensurewindow.TYPEUSERis defined and initializedSetting
typetowindow.TYPEUSERrequires thatwindow.TYPEUSERis defined and initialized before this component is used. Please verify thatwindow.TYPEUSERis properly set to avoid potentialundefinederrors at runtime.You can run the following script to check where
window.TYPEUSERis defined:src/views/components/MessageUpdate.js (5)
1-1: Import statement forFormRecipientis correctThe
FormRecipientcomponent is properly imported from"./generic/FormRecipient.js".
5-7: Component registration is appropriate
FormRecipientis correctly registered within thecomponentsobject.
19-19: Verify thatphone_idconcatenation produces the correct formatThe
phone_idcomputed property now returnsthis.phone + this.type. Ensure that this concatenation results in the correctphone_idformat required by the backend API or other parts of the application.Previously, conditional logic appended different suffixes based on
type. Confirm that the new approach handles all cases correctly. For example, ifthis.phoneis"12345"andthis.typeis"@s.whatsapp.net", thephone_idwould be"[email protected]".
57-57: Consistent reset oftypetowindow.TYPEUSERThe
handleResetmethod resetsthis.typetowindow.TYPEUSER, which aligns with the initial value indata(). Ensure thatwindow.TYPEUSERis consistently defined across different environments where this component runs.
83-83: EnsureFormRecipientsupportsv-modelbindings fortypeandphoneUsing
v-model:typeandv-model:phonerequiresFormRecipientto emitupdate:typeandupdate:phoneevents. Verify that theFormRecipientcomponent is correctly set up to emit these events for two-way data binding.If
FormRecipientdoes not emit the necessary events, the parent component'stypeandphonedata may not update as expected, leading to potential bugs in data handling.src/views/components/SendFile.js (3)
1-1: Successfully importedFormRecipientcomponentThe
FormRecipientcomponent is correctly imported and ready for use.
5-7: Properly registeredFormRecipientin componentsThe
FormRecipientcomponent is properly registered within thecomponentsobject.
90-90:⚠️ Potential issueVerify the usage of
v-modelwith custom argumentsThe usage of
v-model:typeandv-model:phonein the<FormRecipient>component may not be standard in Vue.js unless the component is explicitly designed to accept multiplev-modelbindings. Ensure that theFormRecipientcomponent supports this pattern, or adjust the bindings accordingly.src/views/components/NewsletterList.js (3)
24-27: Verify the 'reloadData' option in DataTable initialization.The option
"reloadData": trueused in the DataTable initialization may not be a valid DataTable parameter. Please confirm if this option is necessary or remove it to prevent potential configuration issues.
58-59: Check the response structure when assigning 'newsletters'.Ensure that
response.data.results.datacorrectly points to the newsletters array. If the API returns an array directly inresponse.data, you might need to adjust the assignment.
15-17: Ensure 'showSuccessInfo' and 'showErrorInfo' functions are defined.The functions
showSuccessInfoandshowErrorInfoare used but not defined within this component. Verify that these functions are globally accessible or imported correctly to prevent runtime errors.Also applies to: 38-40
src/views/components/SendImage.js (1)
93-93: Verify the usage ofv-modelwith arguments inFormRecipientThe syntax
v-model:typeandv-model:phoneis used in theFormRecipientcomponent. Ensure that this syntax is supported in your version of Vue.js. In Vue 2.x, this syntax is not available, and you might need to use:type.syncand:phone.syncinstead.Run the following script to verify the Vue.js version used in the project:
If the version is
^2.x.x, consider updating the code as follows:-<FormRecipient v-model:type="type" v-model:phone="phone"/> +<FormRecipient :type.sync="type" :phone.sync="phone"/>Alternatively, if using Vue.js 3.x, the syntax is acceptable.
| const ok = confirm("Are you sure to leave this newsletter?"); | ||
| if (!ok) return; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Replace browser 'confirm' with a custom modal for consistency.
Using the browser's confirm dialog can result in a user experience inconsistent with the rest of the application. Consider implementing a custom confirmation modal using a Vue component or a UI library to align with the application's design.
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Context
Test Results