Regression #16
Merged
Regression #16
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
djgagne
approved these changes
Feb 29, 2024
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It looks like @lucas-erlandson-nvidia 's comment was resolved. The other changes look good to me.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New:
EvidentialRegLoss()EvidentialRegressorDNN_keras3()that uses Keras subclassingNo current model classes or loss functions were replaced and only new ones were added. I would like thoughts on replacing the former model classes / loss functions with these in a separate PR, which will likely break other aspects of the code base such as the training scripts, notebooks, etc.