Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

improve(relayer): Pass SpokePool addresses to listener processes #1902

Merged
merged 16 commits into from
Nov 30, 2024

Conversation

pxrl
Copy link
Contributor

@pxrl pxrl commented Nov 11, 2024

This skips an RPC call per SpokePool listener in the fast relayer configuration, and permits each SpokePool listener instance to communicate with only a single chain, instead of having to always query mainnet to resolve the current SpokePool address. In case the caller does not supply the SpokePool address, the listener process will fall back to the address specified in the contracts repository.

This skips an RPC call per SpokePool listener in the fast relayer
configuration, and permits each SpokePool listener instance to
communicate with only a single chain, instead of having to always query
mainnet to resolve the current SpokePool address.
Copy link
Member

@nicholaspai nicholaspai left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@pxrl pxrl changed the title improve(relayer): Read SpokePool addresses from contracts repo improve(relayer): Pass SpokePool addresses to listener processes Nov 11, 2024
@pxrl pxrl requested a review from nicholaspai November 13, 2024 15:11
@pxrl pxrl requested a review from james-a-morris November 21, 2024 17:19
Copy link
Contributor

@james-a-morris james-a-morris left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

resolved my questions - lgtm

@pxrl pxrl merged commit b7beea9 into master Nov 30, 2024
4 checks passed
@pxrl pxrl deleted the pxrl/contractUtils branch November 30, 2024 08:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants