Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Include <chrono> for system_clock (#258)
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
  • Loading branch information
@Cheney-W
Cheney-W authored Nov 30, 2024
1 parent 9e319b7 commit e1e68cd
Showing 1 changed file with 1 addition and 0 deletions.
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions src/Util/util.cpp
View file
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
*/

#include <cassert>
#include <chrono>
#include <cstdio>
#include <cstdlib>
#include <cstring>
Expand Down

1 comment on commit e1e68cd

@alexliyu7352
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

AI Review for src/Util/util.cpp:

Code Review: Patch to src/Util/util.cpp

Summary

This patch adds the <chrono> header to src/Util/util.cpp. This is a straightforward change, likely necessary for using std::chrono functionalities within the file. The review will focus on the impact of this addition and its potential implications.

Detailed Feedback

Code Overview

The patch simply adds the #include <chrono> line to the file's header inclusions. This suggests that the original code was missing a necessary header for using time-related functionalities from the <chrono> library, specifically std::chrono::system_clock.

Strengths

  • Clear and Concise: The patch is very simple and easy to understand. The change is self-explanatory and directly addresses the likely missing dependency.
  • Targeted: The change is focused and doesn't introduce unnecessary modifications.

Areas for Improvement

1. Justification and Context

  • Issue: While the patch is simple, it lacks context. The commit message mentions "Include <chrono> for system_clock #258," implying a related issue or pull request. Without access to that information, it's difficult to fully assess the necessity and impact of this change. The review would benefit from a more detailed explanation of why <chrono> is needed. What specific functionality within util.cpp now relies on it?
  • Suggestion: The commit message should include a more detailed explanation of the reason for adding <chrono>. For example, it could mention the specific function(s) that now use std::chrono and briefly describe the functionality. This would improve the clarity and traceability of the change.

2. Potential Conflicts

  • Issue: Adding a header file, while generally a low-risk operation, could potentially introduce conflicts if there are name clashes with other headers or definitions within the project. While unlikely in this specific case, it's a good practice to consider such possibilities.
  • Suggestion: A brief check for potential name collisions with other headers or definitions should be performed. This could involve a simple compilation test after the patch is applied.

Conclusion

The patch itself is well-written and straightforward. However, the lack of context regarding the reason for the change is a significant drawback. Adding a more descriptive commit message with a clear explanation of the necessity and impact of including <chrono> would significantly improve the patch's quality and maintainability. A brief check for potential name collisions would also be a prudent step.

This review was conducted by an AI assistant. While efforts have been made to ensure accuracy and thoroughness, human validation is recommended for critical decisions.

TRANS_BY_GITHUB_AI_ASSISTANT

Please sign in to comment.