DataViews: Refactor to prepare exposing the underlying UI pieces #63694
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
youknowriad
added
[Type] Code Quality
youknowriad
requested review from
oandregal,
ellatrix,
jorgefilipecosta and
ntsekouras
|
Size Change: +417 B (+0.02%) Total Size: 1.75 MB
ℹ️ View Unchanged
|
|
The following accounts have interacted with this PR and/or linked issues. I will continue to update these lists as activity occurs. You can also manually ask me to refresh this list by adding the If you're merging code through a pull request on GitHub, copy and paste the following into the bottom of the merge commit message. To understand the WordPress project's expectations around crediting contributors, please review the Contributor Attribution page in the Core Handbook. |
Both of these issues are present in trunk, I will fix them in separate PRs.
I'm not entirely sure how to duplicate this, I suspect that it's also independent of this refactor. |
For me in trunk it is not happening: To replicate I just go patterns |
|
Opened a quick PR for the title sorting bug noticed here. |
|
The 
Top checkbox for selecting all is bigger. 
|
ntsekouras
reviewed
Jul 18, 2024
| @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ | |||
| export { default as DataViews } from './dataviews'; | |||
| export { default as DataViews } from './components/dataviews'; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
What advantages do you see with adding an extra folder layer with components folder? Additionally every sub folder here has the dataviews prefix. Do you think we need this since we're in dataviews package?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
What advantages do you see with adding an extra folder layer with components folder?
- We have another folder called "layouts" for the default layouts
- We'll have more folders later (field types)
- Components might not be the perfect folder name here but I like that all the components that make up the dataviews and data forms are now in a folder to avoid being mixed with "layouts", "field types"...
Do you think we need this since we're in dataviews package?
Yes, because we have. DataViews and DataForm. DataForm can also potentially be composed later like the DataViews.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Components might not be the perfect folder name here but I like that all the components that make up the dataviews and data forms are now in a folder to avoid being mixed with "layouts", "field types"
I'm fine with it, although my preference for this package is to organise without the components. I think it makes it easier find files related per 'function'. What I mean by this, is have the folder filters for example and add there all related code (filters, global search, etc..).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Other than filters, the other components don't really have sub components, so a folder doesn't really make sense IMO.
ntsekouras
reviewed
Jul 18, 2024
ntsekouras
reviewed
Jul 18, 2024
ntsekouras
reviewed
Jul 18, 2024
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This looks good in general, thank you! There are some z-index issues with actions modals and some styling issues, but it needs more smoke testing to catch them all. I'd be fine to land sooner with quick follow ups if we find more style issues, since it's a big PR and will be a nightmare to rebase all the time.
For me the most important things to decide on is the file structure and maybe the prefixes of folders, and the BulkActions comment regarding conditional rendering per layout.
|
I fixed the z-index issue, I was interestingly an issue because we were reusing classnames rather than reusing components. That's a reminder to avoid that as much as possible :) |
ntsekouras
approved these changes
Jul 19, 2024
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think this is good to land and have quick follow ups if needed to avoid the conflicts.
Still needs the rebase and for sure the:
Top checkbox for selecting all is bigger.
isn't fixed right now, so it could be either fixed here or in the first follow up.
Thanks!
Forgot about this one, I'll look into it. |
youknowriad
force-pushed
the
update/dataviews-context-components
branch
from
26a1be4 to
6110dc1
Compare
This was another case of "classname" reuse instead of "component reuse". Let's stop doing that please. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Related #63646
What?
This PR refractors the DataViews components to prepare them to be exposed (in order to address the need for flexibility in how we render the dataviews).
This PR does the following things:
DataViewsContextReact context that is exposed at the top level.DataViewscomponent and consumed by the underlying composable components. That way the user won't have to pass the same props all over again to all the composable components.dataviews/src/componentsfolder.dataviews/style.scssfile and move the declarations close to each component.In a follow-up PR, I will be exposing the underlying components to allow users to adapt the dataviews UI to their liking.
Testing Instructions
There shouldn't be any change in behavior but because of the scale of this change, some small regressions can happen so I'd appreciate testing the different dataviews that we have.