[Enhancement] check tuple id is in Descriptor table

[before-Sunrise]

Why I'm doing:

crash like below is because tuple id is not in Descriptor table, so nullptr will be return, and visit nullptr cause crash

@ 0x2d66a6b starrocks::RowDescriptor::init_tuple_idx_map()

 @ 0x2d66cc5 starrocks::RowDescriptor::RowDescriptor()

 @ 0x34ad786 starrocks::ExecNode::ExecNode()

 @ 0x36aa444 starrocks::AssertNumRowsNode::AssertNumRowsNode()

 @ 0x34addbd starrocks::ExecNode::create_vectorized_node()

 @ 0x34aee16 starrocks::ExecNode::create_tree_helper()

 @ 0x34af0fd starrocks::ExecNode::create_tree()

 @ 0x37c8bc2 starrocks::pipeline::FragmentExecutor::_prepare_exec_plan()

 @ 0x37ce80d starrocks::pipeline::FragmentExecutor::prepare()

 @ 0x591422b starrocks::PInternalServiceImplBase<>::_exec_plan_fragment_by_pipeline()

 @ 0x591b819 starrocks::PInternalServiceImplBase<>::_exec_plan_fragment()

 @ 0x5926ae5 starrocks::PInternalServiceImplBase<>::_exec_plan_fragment()

 @ 0x2cb460d starrocks::PriorityThreadPool::work_thread()

What I'm doing:

check in FE so BE won't crash, make query dump skip this check for debug purpose

Fixes #issue

What type of PR is this:

• BugFix
• Feature
• Enhancement
• Refactor
• UT
• Doc
• Tool

Does this PR entail a change in behavior?

• Yes, this PR will result in a change in behavior.
• No, this PR will not result in a change in behavior.

If yes, please specify the type of change:

• Interface/UI changes: syntax, type conversion, expression evaluation, display information
• Parameter changes: default values, similar parameters but with different default values
• Policy changes: use new policy to replace old one, functionality automatically enabled
• Feature removed
• Miscellaneous: upgrade & downgrade compatibility, etc.

Checklist:

• I have added test cases for my bug fix or my new feature
• This pr needs user documentation (for new or modified features or behaviors)
• I have added documentation for my new feature or new function
• This is a backport pr

Bugfix cherry-pick branch check:

• I have checked the version labels which the pr will be auto-backported to the target branch
  • 3.4
  • 3.3
  • 3.2
  • 3.1
  • 3.0

[sonarcloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
3 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[github-actions]

[Java-Extensions Incremental Coverage Report]

✅ pass : 0 / 0 (0%)

[github-actions]

[BE Incremental Coverage Report]

✅ pass : 0 / 0 (0%)