Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[BugFix] Fix wrong plan in max(count(distinct)) when enable lowcardinality #53403

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 2, 2024

Conversation

stdpain
Copy link
Contributor

@stdpain stdpain commented Dec 2, 2024

Why I'm doing:

reproduce case:

set new_planner_agg_stage=2;
select max(count(distinct a )) from b;

What I'm doing:

Fixes #issue

What type of PR is this:

  • BugFix
  • Feature
  • Enhancement
  • Refactor
  • UT
  • Doc
  • Tool

Does this PR entail a change in behavior?

  • Yes, this PR will result in a change in behavior.
  • No, this PR will not result in a change in behavior.

If yes, please specify the type of change:

  • Interface/UI changes: syntax, type conversion, expression evaluation, display information
  • Parameter changes: default values, similar parameters but with different default values
  • Policy changes: use new policy to replace old one, functionality automatically enabled
  • Feature removed
  • Miscellaneous: upgrade & downgrade compatibility, etc.

Checklist:

  • I have added test cases for my bug fix or my new feature
  • This pr needs user documentation (for new or modified features or behaviors)
    • I have added documentation for my new feature or new function
  • This is a backport pr

Bugfix cherry-pick branch check:

  • I have checked the version labels which the pr will be auto-backported to the target branch
    • 3.4
    • 3.3
    • 3.2
    • 3.1
    • 3.0

@satanson satanson enabled auto-merge (squash) December 2, 2024 06:18
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Dec 2, 2024

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 2, 2024

[Java-Extensions Incremental Coverage Report]

pass : 0 / 0 (0%)

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 2, 2024

[FE Incremental Coverage Report]

pass : 3 / 3 (100.00%)

file detail

path covered_line new_line coverage not_covered_line_detail
🔵 com/starrocks/sql/optimizer/rule/tree/AddDecodeNodeForDictStringRule.java 3 3 100.00% []

@satanson satanson merged commit aac4a21 into StarRocks:main Dec 2, 2024
49 checks passed
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 2, 2024

[BE Incremental Coverage Report]

pass : 0 / 0 (0%)

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 2, 2024

@Mergifyio backport branch-3.4

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the 3.4 label Dec 2, 2024
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 2, 2024

@Mergifyio backport branch-3.3

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 2, 2024

@Mergifyio backport branch-3.2

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 2, 2024

@Mergifyio backport branch-3.1

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the 3.1 label Dec 2, 2024
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 2, 2024

@Mergifyio backport branch-3.0

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the 3.0 label Dec 2, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Dec 2, 2024

backport branch-3.4

✅ Backports have been created

Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Dec 2, 2024

backport branch-3.3

✅ Backports have been created

Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Dec 2, 2024

backport branch-3.2

✅ Backports have been created

Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Dec 2, 2024

backport branch-3.1

✅ Backports have been created

Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Dec 2, 2024

backport branch-3.0

✅ Backports have been created

mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 2, 2024
mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 2, 2024
mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 2, 2024
mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 2, 2024
mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 2, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants