-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 111
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Archival state support for state_db and native_db #1170
Draft
dubbelosix
wants to merge
15
commits into
nightly
Choose a base branch
from
dub/archival_storage
base: nightly
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Draft
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
15 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
ac8fab3
WIP
cemozerr 8385c5a
Merge branch 'nightly' into dub/archival_storage
dubbelosix b62ab86
get rough test working, create branch from fork
dubbelosix a99481a
test w/ working set and revert
dubbelosix 9421f1e
native archival storage
dubbelosix e3cc36c
Merge branch 'nightly' into dub/archival_storage
dubbelosix 6a3a408
added test case for native storage query
dubbelosix 8f0e0bc
formatting
dubbelosix f53d2cf
fix typo
dubbelosix 1bd0ade
fix broken tests
dubbelosix ab46a03
Merge branch 'nightly' into dub/archival_storage
dubbelosix 457a300
unify version
dubbelosix 13f2732
big archival refactor
dubbelosix c1e4dc7
formatting
dubbelosix 9df60cd
some fixes
dubbelosix File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
With this change, we use iterator on every access to the database.
Do we want to measure performance impact on regular execution?
Maybe it is too late to discuss it, but it looks like archival state taxes on regular execution.
I am raising this point, because together with ForkManagement our storage can become bottleneck.