chore: adding test and refactor sequence executor #61
Conversation
Co-authored-by: ZHallen122 <[email protected]>
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughThis pull request introduces several changes primarily focused on enhancing the structure and documentation of a backend project. Key modifications include the addition of a new UX structure document, a detailed file organization guide, and updates to various handler classes and test suites. Additionally, minor adjustments were made to existing files, such as adding new properties and modifying logging functionalities to improve code maintainability and clarity. Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Warning There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool’s configuration or disable the tool if it’s a critical failure. 🔧 eslint
backend/src/build-system/node/frontend-file-structure/index.tsOops! Something went wrong! :( ESLint: 8.57.1 ESLint couldn't find the plugin "eslint-plugin-prettier". (The package "eslint-plugin-prettier" was not found when loaded as a Node module from the directory "/backend".) It's likely that the plugin isn't installed correctly. Try reinstalling by running the following: The plugin "eslint-plugin-prettier" was referenced from the config file in "backend/.eslintrc.js". If you still can't figure out the problem, please stop by https://eslint.org/chat/help to chat with the team. Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 7
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (15)
backend/src/build-system/node/ux-sitemap-structure/index.ts (4)
11-11: Replace console.log with proper logger.Consider using the context's logger instead of console.log for consistent logging across the application.
- console.log('Generating UX Structure Document...'); + context.logger.info('Generating UX Structure Document...');
Line range hint
19-23: Address the TODO comment and hardcoded value.The hardcoded 'web' value needs to be replaced with a proper implementation.
Would you like me to help implement a proper solution for the platform type parameter?
Line range hint
25-35: Add error handling for the model chat operation.The async model chat operation lacks proper error handling, which could lead to unhandled promise rejections.
Consider implementing proper error handling:
- const uxStructureContent = await context.model.chatSync( - { - content: prompt, - }, - 'gpt-4o-mini', - ); - return { - success: true, - data: uxStructureContent, - }; + try { + const uxStructureContent = await context.model.chatSync( + { + content: prompt, + }, + 'gpt-4o-mini', + ); + return { + success: true, + data: uxStructureContent, + }; + } catch (error) { + context.logger.error('Failed to generate UX Structure:', error); + return { + success: false, + error: 'Failed to generate UX Structure document', + }; + }
Line range hint
10-35: Add input validation for the args parameter.The method accepts an unknown args parameter without validation before using it as a string.
Consider adding type checking and validation:
- async run(context: BuilderContext, args: unknown): Promise<BuildResult> { + async run(context: BuilderContext, args: unknown): Promise<BuildResult> { + if (typeof args !== 'string') { + return { + success: false, + error: 'Invalid arguments: expected string', + }; + }backend/src/build-system/__tests__/test.file-arch.spec.ts (1)
1-5: Consider using absolute imports consistentlyWhile the BuilderContext import uses an absolute path, the FileArchGenerateHandler uses a relative path. Consider using absolute imports consistently throughout the codebase for better maintainability.
-import { FileArchGenerateHandler } from '../node/file-arch'; +import { FileArchGenerateHandler } from 'src/build-system/node/file-arch';backend/src/build-system/hanlder-manager.ts (2)
Line range hint
8-45: Consider a more modular approach for handler registration.As the number of handlers grows, consider:
- Grouping handlers by domain (e.g., UX, PRD, Project)
- Implementing a plugin system for handler registration
- Using a configuration file to define handler mappings
This would improve maintainability and make it easier to add new handlers in the future.
Example approach:
interface HandlerGroup { domain: string; handlers: BuildHandler[]; } private registerBuiltInHandlers() { const handlerGroups: HandlerGroup[] = [ { domain: 'project', handlers: [new ProjectInitHandler()] }, { domain: 'documentation', handlers: [new PRDHandler()] }, { domain: 'ux', handlers: [ new UXSitemapStructureHandler(), new UXDatamapHandler(), new UXSMDHandler() ] } ]; for (const group of handlerGroups) { for (const handler of group.handlers) { this.handlers.set(handler.id, handler); } } }
Fix typo in filename and update imports in 3 dependent files
The verification confirms that the file with the typo is imported in three files:
backend/src/build-system/context.tsbackend/src/build-system/__tests__/test.spec.tsbackend/src/build-system/node/project-init.tsAfter renaming the file using:
git mv backend/src/build-system/hanlder-manager.ts backend/src/build-system/handler-manager.tsUpdate the imports in these files to use the correct path:
import { BuildHandlerManager } from './handler-manager'; // or import { BuildHandlerManager } from '../handler-manager';🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-45: Fix typo in filename: "hanlder-manager.ts" should be "handler-manager.ts"The filename contains a typo that should be corrected. This could affect maintainability and cause confusion.
Please rename the file:
git mv backend/src/build-system/hanlder-manager.ts backend/src/build-system/handler-manager.tsDon't forget to update any import statements in other files that reference this file.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find all files that import from the misspelled filename # Search for imports using the incorrect filename rg "from ['\"].*hanlder-manager['\"]" --type tsLength of output: 356
backend/src/build-system/context.ts (3)
Line range hint
20-20: Add type annotation for the logger propertyThe
loggerproperty should be explicitly typed asLoggerfrom@nestjs/commonfor better type safety and code clarity.- private logger; + private logger: Logger;
36-36: LGTM! Consider moving logger initialization to the property declarationThe logger initialization is correct and provides unique identification per context. However, for better code organization, consider initializing it directly in the property declaration.
- private logger; + private logger = new Logger(`builder-context-${this.id}`); constructor( private sequence: BuildSequence, id: string, ) { this.handlerManager = BuildHandlerManager.getInstance(); this.model = ModelProvider.getInstance(); - this.logger = new Logger(`builder-context-${id}`); }
Line range hint
28-29: Consider renamingidparameter tocontextIdThe
idparameter is used to create a unique logger identifier for each context. Renaming it tocontextIdwould make its purpose more explicit and improve code readability.constructor( private sequence: BuildSequence, - id: string, + contextId: string, ) {backend/src/build-system/__tests__/test-generate-doc.spec.ts (1)
22-105: Consider splitting into smaller, focused testsThe current test case is trying to test multiple aspects of the build sequence execution in a single test. This makes it harder to:
- Identify what exactly failed when the test fails
- Maintain the test
- Understand the test's purpose
Consider splitting this into multiple focused tests:
- Test sequence validation
- Test each step independently
- Test error scenarios
- Test the complete flow as an integration test
This would improve test maintainability and make failures more actionable.
backend/src/build-system/__tests__/datamap-structure.md (2)
33-34: Consider adding technical implementation details for routes.While the route structure is well-defined, consider adding the following technical specifications to aid implementation:
- Authentication flow and protected route handling
- API endpoint patterns corresponding to each route
- State management requirements for each view
- Detailed offline functionality specifications, including caching strategies
Would you like me to help draft these technical specifications?
Also applies to: 66-67, 98-99, 134-135, 166-167, 200-201, 233-234, 262-263
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~33-~33: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ...a. ### Navigation and Routes -/home: Main route for the home page. - Links t...(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)
1-275: Document the file's role in testing.Since this file is used in test suites for file architecture generation, consider adding a section at the beginning that explains:
- How this document is used in tests
- Expected test outcomes
- Validation criteria for file architecture generation
Would you like me to help draft this testing documentation section?
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~33-~33: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ...a. ### Navigation and Routes -/home: Main route for the home page. - Links t...(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)
[uncategorized] ~66-~66: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ... ### Navigation and Routes -/search: Search page route. - Links to `/song/:i...(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)
[uncategorized] ~98-~98: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ... ### Navigation and Routes -/library: Library main page route. - Links to `/p...(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)
[uncategorized] ~134-~134: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ...Navigation and Routes -/playlist/:id,/album/:id,/genre/:id. ### Restri...(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)
[uncategorized] ~233-~233: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ... ### Navigation and Routes -/welcome,/signup,/login. ### Restrictions ...(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)
[uncategorized] ~262-~262: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ...rs. ### Navigation and Routes -/404,/offline. ### Restrictions - Access...(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)
backend/src/build-system/executor.ts (2)
12-13: Ensure Consistent Language in CommentsThe comments currently use Chinese (e.g.,
执行单个节点). To maintain consistency and improve collaboration among all team members, consider translating these comments into English if the project's standard language is English.Also applies to: 47-49, 121-123
Line range hint
58-93: Refactor Retry Logic to Reduce Code DuplicationThe retry logic within the
executeStepmethod is duplicated for both parallel and sequential execution paths. Extracting this logic into a helper function would enhance maintainability and reduce code duplication.Here's a suggestion to refactor the retry logic:
// Add a new helper static method static async executeWithRetry( executeFn: () => Promise<void>, isCompletedFn: () => boolean, maxRetries: number = 10, ): Promise<void> { let retryCount = 0; while (!isCompletedFn() && retryCount < maxRetries) { await executeFn(); if (!isCompletedFn()) { await new Promise((resolve) => setTimeout(resolve, 100)); retryCount++; } } if (!isCompletedFn()) { this.logger.warn(`Failed after ${maxRetries} attempts`); } } // Update the sequential execution for (const node of step.nodes) { await this.executeWithRetry( () => this.executeNode(node, context), () => context.getState().completed.has(node.id), maxRetries, ); } // Similar adjustments can be made for the parallel execution logicAlso applies to: 95-117
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 70-71: Using this in a static context can be confusing.
this refers to the class.
Unsafe fix: Use the class name instead.(lint/complexity/noThisInStatic)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (9)
backend/package.json(1 hunks)backend/src/build-system/__tests__/datamap-structure.md(1 hunks)backend/src/build-system/__tests__/file-structure-document.md(1 hunks)backend/src/build-system/__tests__/test-generate-doc.spec.ts(1 hunks)backend/src/build-system/__tests__/test.file-arch.spec.ts(1 hunks)backend/src/build-system/context.ts(1 hunks)backend/src/build-system/executor.ts(6 hunks)backend/src/build-system/hanlder-manager.ts(2 hunks)backend/src/build-system/node/ux-sitemap-structure/index.ts(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- backend/package.json
- backend/src/build-system/tests/file-structure-document.md
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
backend/src/build-system/__tests__/datamap-structure.md
[uncategorized] ~33-~33: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ...a. ### Navigation and Routes - /home: Main route for the home page. - Links t...
(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)
[uncategorized] ~66-~66: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ... ### Navigation and Routes - /search: Search page route. - Links to `/song/:i...
(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)
[uncategorized] ~98-~98: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ... ### Navigation and Routes - /library: Library main page route. - Links to `/p...
(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)
[uncategorized] ~134-~134: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ...Navigation and Routes - /playlist/:id, /album/:id, /genre/:id. ### Restri...
(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)
[uncategorized] ~233-~233: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ... ### Navigation and Routes - /welcome, /signup, /login. ### Restrictions ...
(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)
[uncategorized] ~262-~262: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ...rs. ### Navigation and Routes - /404, /offline. ### Restrictions - Access...
(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
backend/src/build-system/executor.ts
[error] 36-36: Using this in a static context can be confusing.
this refers to the class.
Unsafe fix: Use the class name instead.
(lint/complexity/noThisInStatic)
[error] 42-42: Using this in a static context can be confusing.
this refers to the class.
Unsafe fix: Use the class name instead.
(lint/complexity/noThisInStatic)
[error] 70-71: Using this in a static context can be confusing.
this refers to the class.
Unsafe fix: Use the class name instead.
(lint/complexity/noThisInStatic)
[error] 106-106: Using this in a static context can be confusing.
this refers to the class.
Unsafe fix: Use the class name instead.
(lint/complexity/noThisInStatic)
[error] 128-128: Using this in a static context can be confusing.
this refers to the class.
Unsafe fix: Use the class name instead.
(lint/complexity/noThisInStatic)
[error] 133-133: Using this in a static context can be confusing.
this refers to the class.
Unsafe fix: Use the class name instead.
(lint/complexity/noThisInStatic)
🔇 Additional comments (7)
backend/src/build-system/node/ux-sitemap-structure/index.ts (1)
6-8: Verify consistent naming convention across the codebase.
While the renaming to UXSitemapStructureHandler and the ID abbreviation to UXSMS makes sense, we should ensure this convention is followed consistently.
✅ Verification successful
The naming convention is consistently applied across the codebase
The verification shows that:
- No traces of old naming (
UXStructureHandlerorUX_Structure) remain in the codebase - The new naming (
UXSitemapStructureHandlerandUXSMS) is used consistently in all relevant files - The ID format
op:UXSMS::STATE:GENERATEis consistently referenced in tests
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any inconsistent naming patterns related to UX Structure/Sitemap
# across the codebase
# Check for any remaining references to the old naming
rg -i "UXStructureHandler|UX_Structure"
# Check for consistent usage of UXSMS abbreviation
rg -i "UXSMS|UXSitemapStructure"
# Look for similar handler patterns to verify naming consistency
ast-grep --pattern 'class $_Handler implements BuildHandler {
readonly id = $_;
}'
Length of output: 790
backend/src/build-system/__tests__/test.file-arch.spec.ts (1)
21-22: Verify the existence of referenced markdown files
The test references two markdown files that need to be present for the test to work.
Also applies to: 24-25
✅ Verification successful
Files exist in the expected location
Both referenced markdown files are present in the same directory as the test file:
backend/src/build-system/__tests__/file-structure-document.mdbackend/src/build-system/__tests__/datamap-structure.md
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if the referenced markdown files exist in the repository
echo "Checking for markdown files..."
fd -e md -t f "file-structure-document.md|datamap-structure.md"
Length of output: 254
backend/src/build-system/hanlder-manager.ts (2)
4-6: LGTM! Import statements are well-structured.
The new imports follow the existing pattern and are logically organized.
20-22: Verify handler interface implementation.
The new handlers should implement the BuildHandler interface. Let's verify their implementation.
✅ Verification successful
All handlers correctly implement the BuildHandler interface
All three handlers (UXSitemapStructureHandler, UXDatamapHandler, and UXSMDHandler) properly implement the BuildHandler interface with:
- A unique
idproperty - A
runmethod with correct signature(context: BuilderContext, args: unknown): Promise<BuildResult> - Consistent return type structure
{ success: boolean, data: any }
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the new handlers properly implement the BuildHandler interface
# Check UXSitemapStructureHandler implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'class UXSitemapStructureHandler implements BuildHandler {
$$$
}'
# Check UXDatamapHandler implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'class UXDatamapHandler implements BuildHandler {
$$$
}'
# Check UXSMDHandler implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'class UXSMDHandler implements BuildHandler {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 9275
backend/src/build-system/__tests__/test-generate-doc.spec.ts (1)
1-7: LGTM! Imports are well-organized and necessary.
The imports cover all required dependencies for the test implementation.
backend/src/build-system/__tests__/datamap-structure.md (1)
1-2: LGTM: Clear document title and structure.
The document title clearly indicates its purpose as a UX structure map for a Spotify-like application.
backend/src/build-system/executor.ts (1)
7-9: Logger Initialization is Correct
The static logger is correctly initialized with a unique identifier using uuidv4().
| describe('FileArchGenerateHandler', () => { | ||
| it('should generate file architecture document', async () => { | ||
| const handler = new FileArchGenerateHandler(); | ||
| const context = new BuilderContext( | ||
| { | ||
| id: 'test', | ||
| name: 'test file arch', | ||
| version: '1.0.0', | ||
| description: 'test file architecture', | ||
| steps: [], | ||
| }, | ||
| 'test-id-file-arch-1', | ||
| ); | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance test coverage with additional test cases
The current test suite only covers the happy path. Consider adding:
- Error scenarios (invalid file content, missing files)
- Edge cases (empty files, large files)
- Validation of handler initialization
- Input parameter validation tests
Also, consider using beforeEach to set up the common test context.
Example structure:
describe('FileArchGenerateHandler', () => {
let handler: FileArchGenerateHandler;
let context: BuilderContext;
beforeEach(() => {
handler = new FileArchGenerateHandler();
context = new BuilderContext(
{
id: 'test',
name: 'test file arch',
version: '1.0.0',
description: 'test file architecture',
steps: [],
},
'test-id-file-arch-1',
);
});
it('should generate file architecture document with valid inputs', async () => {
// Current test case
});
it('should handle missing input files gracefully', async () => {
// Error scenario
});
it('should validate input parameters', async () => {
// Validation test
});
});| const fileStructure = markdownToTxt( | ||
| readFileSync('./file-structure-document.md', 'utf-8'), | ||
| ); | ||
| const dataMapStruct = markdownToTxt( | ||
| readFileSync('./datamap-structure.md', 'utf-8'), | ||
| ); | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Improve file handling robustness
Several improvements are needed in the file reading logic:
- Use asynchronous file operations
- Add error handling for file operations
- Move file paths to test constants or fixtures
- Consider mocking file system operations for tests
Example improvement:
const TEST_FILES = {
fileStructure: './src/build-system/__tests__/__fixtures__/file-structure-document.md',
dataMap: './src/build-system/__tests__/__fixtures__/datamap-structure.md',
} as const;
try {
const fileStructure = markdownToTxt(
await fs.readFile(TEST_FILES.fileStructure, 'utf-8'),
);
const dataMapStruct = markdownToTxt(
await fs.readFile(TEST_FILES.dataMap, 'utf-8'),
);
} catch (error) {
throw new Error(`Failed to read test files: ${error.message}`);
}| const result = await handler.run(context, fileStructure, dataMapStruct); | ||
| console.log(result); | ||
| }, 30000); | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add proper test assertions and remove console.log
The current test lacks proper validation:
- Replace console.log with actual assertions
- Validate the structure and content of the result
- Document the reason for the 30-second timeout or adjust if unnecessary
Example improvement:
const result = await handler.run(context, fileStructure, dataMapStruct);
expect(result).toBeDefined();
expect(result).toMatchObject({
// Add expected structure here
// Example:
// fileStructure: expect.any(String),
// dataMap: expect.any(String),
});Also, consider adding a comment explaining the timeout if it's necessary:
// 30 second timeout needed due to complex file processing for large architecture documents
}, 30000);| it('should execute the full sequence and log results to individual files', async () => { | ||
| const sequence: BuildSequence = { | ||
| id: 'test-sequence', | ||
| version: '1.0.0', | ||
| name: 'Test PRD to UX Sequence', | ||
| description: 'Testing PRD to UX sequence execution', | ||
| steps: [ | ||
| { | ||
| id: 'step-1', | ||
| name: 'Generate PRD', | ||
| nodes: [ | ||
| { | ||
| id: 'op:PRD::STATE:GENERATE', | ||
| name: 'PRD Generation Node', | ||
| type: 'ANALYSIS', | ||
| subType: 'PRD', | ||
| }, | ||
| ], | ||
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| id: 'step-2', | ||
| name: 'Generate UX Sitemap Document', | ||
| nodes: [ | ||
| { | ||
| id: 'op:UXSMD::STATE:GENERATE', | ||
| name: 'UX Sitemap Document Node', | ||
| type: 'UX', | ||
| subType: 'SITEMAP', | ||
| requires: ['op:PRD::STATE:GENERATE'], | ||
| }, | ||
| ], | ||
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| id: 'step-3', | ||
| name: 'Generate UX Sitemap Structure', | ||
| nodes: [ | ||
| { | ||
| id: 'op:UXSMS::STATE:GENERATE', | ||
| name: 'UX Sitemap Structure Node', | ||
| type: 'UX', | ||
| subType: 'VIEWS', | ||
| requires: ['op:UXSMD::STATE:GENERATE'], | ||
| }, | ||
| ], | ||
| }, | ||
| ], | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| // Initialize context | ||
| const context = new BuilderContext(sequence, 'test'); | ||
|
|
||
| // Set input data in context | ||
| context.setData('projectName', 'spotify like music web'); | ||
| context.setData('description', 'user can play music'); | ||
| context.setData('platform', 'web'); | ||
|
|
||
| // Execute sequence | ||
| try { | ||
| await BuildSequenceExecutor.executeSequence(sequence, context); | ||
|
|
||
| // Write results for each node | ||
| sequence.steps.forEach((step) => { | ||
| step.nodes.forEach((node) => { | ||
| const resultData = context.getResult(node.id); | ||
| if (resultData) { | ||
| writeDataToFile(node.name.replace(/ /g, '_'), resultData); | ||
| } | ||
| }); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| console.log( | ||
| 'Sequence completed successfully. Logs stored in:', | ||
| logFolderPath, | ||
| ); | ||
| } catch (error) { | ||
| console.error('Error during sequence execution:', error); | ||
| fs.writeFileSync( | ||
| path.join(logFolderPath, 'error.txt'), | ||
| `Error: ${error.message}\n${error.stack}`, | ||
| 'utf8', | ||
| ); | ||
| throw error; | ||
| } | ||
| }, 60000); // Timeout extended for long-running sequence |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance test robustness and maintainability
The test case needs improvements in several areas:
- Missing assertions to validate the results
- Hardcoded test data
- Generic error handling
- Unexplained long timeout
Consider refactoring the test case:
- Add assertions to verify the results
- Extract test data to fixtures
- Add specific error handling
- Document the timeout reason
+ // Load test data from fixture
+ const testSequence: BuildSequence = require('./fixtures/test-sequence.json');
+
it('should execute the full sequence and log results to individual files', async () => {
- const sequence: BuildSequence = {
- id: 'test-sequence',
- // ... (move this to a fixture file)
- };
+ const sequence = testSequence;
const context = new BuilderContext(sequence, 'test');
try {
await BuildSequenceExecutor.executeSequence(sequence, context);
+
+ // Verify results for each step
+ sequence.steps.forEach((step) => {
+ step.nodes.forEach((node) => {
+ const resultData = context.getResult(node.id);
+ expect(resultData).toBeDefined();
+ expect(resultData).toMatchSnapshot();
+ });
+ });
// Write results...
} catch (error) {
+ // Handle specific error types
+ if (error instanceof BuildSequenceError) {
+ console.error('Build sequence failed:', error.message);
+ } else if (error instanceof ValidationError) {
+ console.error('Validation failed:', error.message);
+ } else {
console.error('Error during sequence execution:', error);
+ }
// ... error handling
}
- }, 60000);
+ }, 60000); // Extended timeout needed for complex sequence execution including file I/OCommittable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| describe('Sequence: PRD -> UXSD -> UXDD -> UXSS', () => { | ||
| // Generate a unique folder with a timestamp | ||
| const timestamp = new Date().toISOString().replace(/[:.]/g, '-'); // Format timestamp | ||
| const logFolderPath = `./log-${timestamp}`; | ||
| fs.mkdirSync(logFolderPath, { recursive: true }); // Create folder | ||
|
|
||
| // Utility function to write data to individual files | ||
| const writeDataToFile = (handlerName: string, data: any) => { | ||
| const filePath = path.join(logFolderPath, `${handlerName}.txt`); | ||
| const logContent = `${new Date().toISOString()}\n${JSON.stringify(data, null, 2)}\n`; | ||
| fs.writeFileSync(filePath, logContent, 'utf8'); | ||
| console.log(`Logged ${handlerName} result data to ${filePath}`); | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add test cleanup and error handling
The test setup creates log files but doesn't clean them up after the test completes. Additionally, the utility function needs better error handling.
Consider implementing:
- Cleanup in an
afterAllhook - Error handling for file operations
- Input validation for the utility function
describe('Sequence: PRD -> UXSD -> UXDD -> UXSS', () => {
const timestamp = new Date().toISOString().replace(/[:.]/g, '-');
const logFolderPath = `./log-${timestamp}`;
- fs.mkdirSync(logFolderPath, { recursive: true });
+ beforeAll(() => {
+ fs.mkdirSync(logFolderPath, { recursive: true });
+ });
+
+ afterAll(() => {
+ if (fs.existsSync(logFolderPath)) {
+ fs.rmSync(logFolderPath, { recursive: true });
+ }
+ });
const writeDataToFile = (handlerName: string, data: any) => {
+ if (!handlerName || data === undefined) {
+ throw new Error('Invalid input parameters');
+ }
const filePath = path.join(logFolderPath, `${handlerName}.txt`);
- const logContent = `${new Date().toISOString()}\n${JSON.stringify(data, null, 2)}\n`;
- fs.writeFileSync(filePath, logContent, 'utf8');
+ try {
+ const logContent = `${new Date().toISOString()}\n${JSON.stringify(data, null, 2)}\n`;
+ fs.writeFileSync(filePath, logContent, 'utf8');
+ } catch (error) {
+ console.error(`Failed to write to ${filePath}:`, error);
+ throw error;
+ }
};📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| describe('Sequence: PRD -> UXSD -> UXDD -> UXSS', () => { | |
| // Generate a unique folder with a timestamp | |
| const timestamp = new Date().toISOString().replace(/[:.]/g, '-'); // Format timestamp | |
| const logFolderPath = `./log-${timestamp}`; | |
| fs.mkdirSync(logFolderPath, { recursive: true }); // Create folder | |
| // Utility function to write data to individual files | |
| const writeDataToFile = (handlerName: string, data: any) => { | |
| const filePath = path.join(logFolderPath, `${handlerName}.txt`); | |
| const logContent = `${new Date().toISOString()}\n${JSON.stringify(data, null, 2)}\n`; | |
| fs.writeFileSync(filePath, logContent, 'utf8'); | |
| console.log(`Logged ${handlerName} result data to ${filePath}`); | |
| }; | |
| describe('Sequence: PRD -> UXSD -> UXDD -> UXSS', () => { | |
| // Generate a unique folder with a timestamp | |
| const timestamp = new Date().toISOString().replace(/[:.]/g, '-'); // Format timestamp | |
| const logFolderPath = `./log-${timestamp}`; | |
| beforeAll(() => { | |
| fs.mkdirSync(logFolderPath, { recursive: true }); | |
| }); | |
| afterAll(() => { | |
| if (fs.existsSync(logFolderPath)) { | |
| fs.rmSync(logFolderPath, { recursive: true }); | |
| } | |
| }); | |
| // Utility function to write data to individual files | |
| const writeDataToFile = (handlerName: string, data: any) => { | |
| if (!handlerName || data === undefined) { | |
| throw new Error('Invalid input parameters'); | |
| } | |
| const filePath = path.join(logFolderPath, `${handlerName}.txt`); | |
| try { | |
| const logContent = `${new Date().toISOString()}\n${JSON.stringify(data, null, 2)}\n`; | |
| fs.writeFileSync(filePath, logContent, 'utf8'); | |
| console.log(`Logged ${handlerName} result data to ${filePath}`); | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| console.error(`Failed to write to ${filePath}:`, error); | |
| throw error; | |
| } | |
| }; |
| - **Dynamic Content**: | ||
| - Recommendations, playlists, recently played, and search results update in real-time based on user activity. | ||
| - **Restrictions**: | ||
| - Login required for personalized content, library access, and playback history. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance security specifications in restrictions.
The current restrictions section would benefit from more detailed security specifications:
- Authentication mechanisms (OAuth, JWT, etc.)
- User authorization levels and roles
- Rate limiting policies
- Data access control patterns
Would you like me to help draft detailed security specifications?
| } | ||
|
|
||
| if (!this.context.canExecute(node.id)) { | ||
| if (!context.canExecute(node.id)) { | ||
| this.logger.log( | ||
| `Waiting for dependencies: ${node.requires?.join(', ')}`, | ||
| ); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Replace 'this' with Class Name in Static Methods
Using this in static methods can be confusing because it refers to the class itself rather than an instance. It's clearer to use the class name directly for better readability and to adhere to best practices.
Apply the following changes:
- this.logger.log(`Waiting for dependencies: ${node.requires?.join(', ')}`);
+ BuildSequenceExecutor.logger.log(`Waiting for dependencies: ${node.requires?.join(', ')}`);
- this.logger.log(
+ BuildSequenceExecutor.logger.log(
`Executing node ${node.id} with dependencies:`,
dependenciesResults,
);
- this.logger.error(`Error executing node ${node.id}:`, error);
+ BuildSequenceExecutor.logger.error(`Error executing node ${node.id}:`, error);
- this.logger.log(`Executing build step: ${step.id}`);
+ BuildSequenceExecutor.logger.log(`Executing build step: ${step.id}`);
- this.logger.warn(
+ BuildSequenceExecutor.logger.warn(
`Failed to execute node ${node.id} after ${maxRetries} attempts`,
);
- this.logger.log(`Starting build sequence: ${sequence.id}`);
+ BuildSequenceExecutor.logger.log(`Starting build sequence: ${sequence.id}`);
- this.logger.warn(
+ BuildSequenceExecutor.logger.warn(
`Step ${step.id} failed to complete nodes: ${incompletedNodes
.map((n) => n.id)
.join(', ')}`,
);
- this.logger.log(`Build sequence completed: ${sequence.id}`);
+ BuildSequenceExecutor.logger.log(`Build sequence completed: ${sequence.id}`);
- this.logger.log('Final state:', context.getState());
+ BuildSequenceExecutor.logger.log('Final state:', context.getState());Also applies to: 34-34, 57-57, 80-80, 99-99, 113-113, 130-130, 136-136, 148-148
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **New Features** - Introduced a new `FileStructureHandler` class to manage file structure generation for frontend projects. - Added a prompt generation method that outlines the folder and file structure for the `src` directory, including specific guidelines for organization and naming conventions. - **Documentation** - Enhanced documentation for the new prompt generation method to clarify its usage and output format. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> --------- Co-authored-by: Jackson Chen <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (8)
backend/src/build-system/node/frontend-file-structure/index.ts (2)
3-3: Remove unused importModelProviderThe
ModelProviderimport is not used in this file and should be removed.-import { ModelProvider } from 'src/common/model-provider';
24-29: Extract model name to configurationThe model name 'gpt-4o-mini' should be configurable rather than hardcoded.
const fileStructureContent = await context.model.chatSync( { content: prompt, }, - 'gpt-4o-mini', + context.config.defaultModel || 'gpt-4o-mini', );backend/src/build-system/hanlder-manager.ts (1)
Line range hint
9-49: Strong architectural foundation with room for growth.The
BuildHandlerManagerimplementation demonstrates good practices:
- Proper singleton pattern implementation
- Clean separation of concerns
- Extensible handler registration mechanism
Consider these future enhancements:
- Add handler validation during registration
- Implement handler priority/ordering if needed
- Consider adding handler lifecycle hooks
backend/src/build-system/types.ts (1)
23-31: Consider using discriminated unions for better type safetyThe changes to make both
nameandtypeoptional suggest a move towards more flexible build configurations. However, this flexibility comes at the cost of type safety. Consider using discriminated unions or builder patterns to maintain both flexibility and type safety.Example approach:
type BaseBuildNode = { id: string; description?: string; requires?: string[]; }; type NamedBuildNode = BaseBuildNode & { name: string; type: BuildNodeType; subType: BuildSubType[BuildNodeType]; }; type AnonymousBuildNode = BaseBuildNode & { name?: never; type?: never; subType?: never; }; type BuildNode = NamedBuildNode | AnonymousBuildNode;This approach would:
- Maintain type safety through explicit unions
- Make the relationship between optional properties clearer
- Prevent invalid combinations of properties
backend/src/build-system/node/frontend-file-structure/prompt.ts (4)
11-13: Fix inconsistent string interpolation formatting.The Data Analysis Doc interpolation format is inconsistent with the other fields.
Apply this diff:
- Project name: ${projectName} - Sitemap Documentation: ${sitemapDoc} - - Data Analysis Doc ${DataAnalysisDoc} + - Data Analysis Documentation: ${dataAnalysisDoc}
40-44: Add TypeScript-specific guidance for file extensions.The file naming guidelines mention
.tsxfiles but don't provide comprehensive TypeScript-specific guidance.Consider adding these guidelines:
Use meaningful and descriptive file names. - For components, include an index.tsx file in each folder to simplify imports. + For components, include an index.ts(x) file in each folder to simplify imports. Each component should have its own folder named after the component (e.g., Button/). - Use index.tsx as the main file inside the component folder. + Use index.tsx for React components and index.ts for non-React modules. Component-specific styles must be in index.css within the same folder as the component. + Create separate type definition files (*.types.ts) for complex type declarations.
51-51: Fix grammatical error in self-check question.The self-check question contains a grammatical error.
Apply this diff:
- 1, Are you consider all the cases based on the sitemap doc? If not add new folder or file + 1. Have you considered all the cases based on the sitemap doc? If not, add new folders or files
53-53: Add security considerations for production use.The statement about production use should include security considerations.
Consider adding security-focused guidelines:
-This final result must be 100% complete. Will be directly use in the production +This final result must be 100% complete and secure for production use: +- Ensure proper separation of sensitive configuration +- Follow security best practices for file permissions +- Avoid exposing internal implementation details in public paths +- Include security-related utility functions (e.g., input sanitization, XSS prevention)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
backend/.gitignore(1 hunks)backend/src/build-system/__tests__/test-generate-doc.spec.ts(1 hunks)backend/src/build-system/hanlder-manager.ts(2 hunks)backend/src/build-system/node/frontend-file-structure/index.ts(1 hunks)backend/src/build-system/node/frontend-file-structure/prompt.ts(1 hunks)backend/src/build-system/types.ts(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- backend/.gitignore
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- backend/src/build-system/tests/test-generate-doc.spec.ts
🔇 Additional comments (4)
backend/src/build-system/node/frontend-file-structure/index.ts (1)
6-8: LGTM! Clean implementation of BuildHandler interface
The class declaration and id property are well-structured and follow the expected pattern.
backend/src/build-system/hanlder-manager.ts (1)
21-24: Consider handler initialization order and dependencies.
While the handler registration looks correct, it's important to verify that there are no implicit dependencies between handlers that might require a specific initialization order.
Let's check for potential dependencies between handlers:
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about potential dependencies by checking the implementation details of these handlers.
Based on the analysis of the handlers' implementations, I can now generate the final response:
Handler initialization order is appropriate with no dependency concerns
The handlers operate independently, each implementing the BuildHandler interface and only sharing the BuilderContext for:
- Reading common project data (e.g.,
projectName) - Storing their own results in the context
No handler depends on the results of other handlers in their execution, making the current initialization order safe.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for potential dependencies between handlers
# by looking for cross-references in their implementation
# Search for references to other handlers
rg -A 3 "UXSitemapStructureHandler|UXDatamapHandler|UXSMDHandler|FileStructureHandler" --type ts
# Look for potential circular dependencies in imports
ast-grep --pattern 'import { $$$ } from "./node/$_"'
Length of output: 3183
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the implementation of handlers for dependencies in their run methods
# and any shared state or context usage
# Look for BuilderContext usage and dependencies
rg -A 5 "async run\(context: BuilderContext" --type ts
# Check if handlers access results from other handlers
rg -B 2 "context\.(get|set)" --type ts
# Look for any explicit ordering requirements in comments
rg -B 2 "@|/\*\*|//.*order" --type ts
Length of output: 93502
backend/src/build-system/types.ts (2)
23-23: Verify the impact of making name optional
Making the name property optional could affect logging, UI displays, or debugging capabilities. Please ensure that all consumers of BuildBase properly handle the case when name is undefined.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more specific information about the BuildBase interface usage.
Let me check how the BuildNode interface is used in the codebase to understand the impact of optional properties.
Based on the gathered information, I can now provide the final response:
Making name optional in BuildBase is safe
The codebase analysis shows that:
- The
nameproperty is already being treated as optional in several places - No direct dependencies on
BuildBase.namefor critical functionality - The only usage of
nameappears in logging (writeMarkdownToFilein test-generate-doc.spec.ts), which already handles the optional case - Other interfaces in the codebase (in chat/protocol.ts and model-provider/index.ts) also treat
nameas optional, showing this is a consistent pattern
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for usages of BuildBase.name to verify proper null checks
rg -t ts -A 3 "\.name" backend/
Length of output: 6603
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for direct usages of BuildBase interface and its name property
rg -t ts "BuildBase" -A 5 backend/
# Search for any error handling or null checks related to name property
rg -t ts "(name\s*\?\s*:|name.*undefined|name.*null)" backend/
Length of output: 985
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for BuildNode usage and implementations
rg -t ts "BuildNode" -B 2 -A 5 backend/
# Search for any code that creates or processes BuildNode instances
ast-grep --pattern 'const $_ : BuildNode = $_'
Length of output: 4050
29-31:
Critical: Reconsider making type optional
Making the type property optional could lead to several issues:
typeappears to be a crucial discriminator for determining the build node's purposesubTypedepends ontypefor its type union, which could lead to type safety issues- Build handlers may expect
typeto be defined, potentially causing runtime errors
Consider keeping type as a required property or provide a default type:
- type?: BuildNodeType;
+ type: BuildNodeType;| const prompt = prompts.generateFileStructurePrompt( | ||
| projectName, | ||
| args as string, | ||
| // TODO: change later | ||
| args as string, | ||
| 'FrameWork Holder', | ||
| ); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Improve type safety and remove TODO comment
The current implementation has several issues:
- Unsafe type casting of
args - Duplicate usage of
argsparameter - Unaddressed TODO comment
- Hardcoded framework value
Consider implementing proper type checking and documentation:
- const prompt = prompts.generateFileStructurePrompt(
- projectName,
- args as string,
- // TODO: change later
- args as string,
- 'FrameWork Holder',
- );
+ if (typeof args !== 'string') {
+ throw new Error('Expected args to be a string containing sitemap document');
+ }
+ const framework = context.getData('framework') || 'react';
+ const prompt = prompts.generateFileStructurePrompt(
+ projectName,
+ args,
+ args,
+ framework,
+ );Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| return { | ||
| success: true, | ||
| data: fileStructureContent, | ||
| }; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider adding error handling
The current implementation assumes the model chat will always succeed. Consider adding proper error handling.
+ try {
const fileStructureContent = await context.model.chatSync(
{
content: prompt,
},
'gpt-4o-mini',
);
return {
success: true,
data: fileStructureContent,
};
+ } catch (error) {
+ context.logger.error('Failed to generate file structure', error);
+ return {
+ success: false,
+ error: 'Failed to generate file structure document',
+ };
+ }Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| readonly id = 'op:FSTRUCT::STATE:GENERATE'; | ||
|
|
||
| async run(context: BuilderContext, args: unknown): Promise<BuildResult> { | ||
| console.log('Generating File Structure Document...'); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Replace console.log with context logger
Use the context's logger instead of console.log for consistent logging throughout the application.
- console.log('Generating File Structure Document...');
+ context.logger.info('Generating File Structure Document...');Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| import { UXSitemapStructureHandler } from './node/ux-sitemap-structure'; | ||
| import { UXDatamapHandler } from './node/ux-datamap'; | ||
| import { UXSMDHandler } from './node/ux-sitemap-document/uxsmd'; | ||
| import { FileStructureHandler } from './node/frontend-file-structure'; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Warning: Missing handler implementations and inconsistent imports
The verification reveals critical issues:
- Only
UXSMDHandlerexists in the codebase atbackend/src/build-system/node/ux-sitemap-document/uxsmd.ts - The other three handlers (
UXSitemapStructureHandler,UXDatamapHandler,FileStructureHandler) are not found in the codebase - The
handler-manager.tsfile itself is not found, despite being the file under review
This suggests that either:
- The handlers are yet to be implemented
- The imports reference files that don't exist
- The PR might be incomplete or referencing files from another branch
🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM! Verify handler implementations.
The new imports follow a consistent naming convention and suggest good separation of concerns. Each handler appears to focus on a specific aspect of UX documentation or file structure.
Let's verify the implementation of these new handlers:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that all new handlers properly implement the BuildHandler interface
# and contain the required methods
# Check for proper interface implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'class $handler implements BuildHandler {
$$$
id: string;
$$$
execute($$$): $$$;
$$$
}'
Length of output: 118
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to verify the handler implementations
# First, let's check if the files exist and examine their content
# Check UXSitemapStructureHandler
echo "=== Checking UXSitemapStructureHandler ==="
rg -A 5 "class UXSitemapStructureHandler" ./backend/src/build-system/node/ux-sitemap-structure.ts
echo -e "\n=== Checking UXDatamapHandler ==="
rg -A 5 "class UXDatamapHandler" ./backend/src/build-system/node/ux-datamap.ts
echo -e "\n=== Checking UXSMDHandler ==="
rg -A 5 "class UXSMDHandler" ./backend/src/build-system/node/ux-sitemap-document/uxsmd.ts
echo -e "\n=== Checking FileStructureHandler ==="
rg -A 5 "class FileStructureHandler" ./backend/src/build-system/node/frontend-file-structure.ts
# Also check the BuildHandler interface definition
echo -e "\n=== Checking BuildHandler interface ==="
rg "interface BuildHandler" -A 5
Length of output: 2361
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify if these files exist in different locations or with slightly different names
echo "=== Searching for handler files ===="
fd -e ts ux-sitemap-structure
fd -e ts ux-datamap
fd -e ts uxsmd
fd -e ts file-structure
echo -e "\n=== Checking content of any found UXSMD implementation ==="
rg -l "class.*UXSMDHandler" -g "*.ts"
# Let's also check the HandlerManager to see how these handlers are used
echo -e "\n=== Checking HandlerManager implementation ==="
rg -A 10 "builtInHandlers" ./backend/src/build-system/handler-manager.ts
Length of output: 738
| export const prompts = { | ||
| generateFileStructurePrompt: ( | ||
| projectName: string, | ||
| sitemapDoc: string, | ||
| DataAnalysisDoc: string, | ||
| framework: string, | ||
| ): string => { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Clean up method signature.
- The
frameworkparameter is not used in the template string. - The
DataAnalysisDocparameter uses PascalCase, which is inconsistent with the camelCase naming of other parameters.
Apply this diff:
export const prompts = {
generateFileStructurePrompt: (
projectName: string,
sitemapDoc: string,
- DataAnalysisDoc: string,
- framework: string,
+ dataAnalysisDoc: string,
): string => {📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| export const prompts = { | |
| generateFileStructurePrompt: ( | |
| projectName: string, | |
| sitemapDoc: string, | |
| DataAnalysisDoc: string, | |
| framework: string, | |
| ): string => { | |
| export const prompts = { | |
| generateFileStructurePrompt: ( | |
| projectName: string, | |
| sitemapDoc: string, | |
| dataAnalysisDoc: string, | |
| ): string => { |
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
BuilderContextclass.Documentation
Chores
.gitignoreto exclude timestamped log files.Tests