remove social survery

pages/general_rules/PenaltiesBonuses.tex

@@ -41,45 +41,6 @@ \subsection{Bonus for outstanding performance}\label{rule:outstanding_performanc
 	\item It is the decision of the \iaterm{Technical Committee}{TC} if (and to which degree) the bonus score is granted.
 \end{enumerate}
 
-\subsection{Bonus for perceived social intelligence}\label{rule:perceived_intelligence}
-\begin{enumerate}	
-    \item For the test \iterm{Receptionist} in \iterm{Stage~I} and, \iterm{Restaurant} in \iterm{Stage~II} tests. Teams are evaluated on the robot's perceived social intelligence 
-     performance
-
-    \item This bonus, ranging from 0 to 50, depends on the robot's social performance which will be assessed by Referees using a specially designed scale in a survey.
-
-    \item The survey evaluates how the robot recognizes, adapts to, and predicts emotions, behaviors, and cognitions. Each component is assessed through several questions, scored on a scale from 1 to 5, where 1 represents "strongly disagree" and 5 represents "strongly agree." The questions used for evaluation include:
-    \begin{itemize}
-        \item This robot notices human presence
-        \item This robot enjoys meeting people
-        \item This robot recognizes individual people
-        \item This robot notices when people do things
-        \item This robot adapts effectively to different things people do
-        \item This robot anticipates people's behavior
-        \item This robot tries to be helpful
-        \item This robot is trustworthy
-        \item This robot cares about others
-        \item This robot tries to hurt people
-        \item This robot knows if someone is part of a social group
-        \item This robot thinks it is better than everyone else
-        \item This robot adapts its behavior based upon what people around it know
-        \item This robot is impolite
-        \item This robot is socially competent
-    \end{itemize}
-    Detailed information can be found in this \href{https://ipip.ori.org/PSIManualSeptember2018.pdf}{manual}.
-
-    \item In each evaluation, the score for every question is summed up and then normalized as follows:
-    \[ x' = N \cdot \frac{{x - x_{\text{min}}}}{{x_{\text{max}} - x_{\text{min}}}} \]
-
-    Here, \( N \) is the normalizing factor (50), \( x \) is the sum of scores for each question in the current evaluation, \( x_{\text{min}} \) is set to 15 (since there are 15 questions), and \( x_{\text{max}} \) is set to 75 (as the maximum score for each question is 5).
-
-    \item The final score is calculated as the average of individual evaluator scores.
-
-    \item The referee has the authority to skip the social assessment test if they believe the robot's performance is not suitable for measurement.
-
-    \item After the test is completed, the evaluators will fill out the form, and the scores will be automatically recorded in this \href{https://urjc-my.sharepoint.com/:x:/g/personal/juan_pena_urjc_es/Eb4WyP1H4-FCqeW-qVZ3mF0BRzBR1Cn-J5ltluy90fhTJQ?rtime=guRqYF483Eg}{spreadsheet}.
-\end{enumerate}
-
 % Local Variables:
 % TeX-master: "../Rulebook"
 % End:

scoresheets/Receptionist.tex

@@ -6,7 +6,6 @@
 	\scoreitem[2]{100}{Offer a free seat to the new guest}
 	\scoreitem[2]{25}{Look at the person talking}
 	\scoreitem[2]{50}{Look at the person the robot is introducing the guest to}
-	\scoreitem{50}{Qualitative robot social performance \ifShortScoresheet{(see sec.~\ref{rule:perceived_intelligence})}}
 
 	\scoreheading{Bonus Rewards}
 	\scoreitem[2]{100}{Open the entrance door for a guest}

scoresheets/Restaurant.tex

@@ -5,7 +5,6 @@
 
 	\scoreitem[2]{300}{Take an order.}
 	\scoreitem[2]{300}{Serve an order.}
-	\scoreitem{50}{Qualitative robot social performance \ifShortScoresheet{(see sec.~\ref{rule:perceived_intelligence})}}
 
 	\scoreheading{Bonus Rewards}
 	\scoreitem[2]{200}{Use an unattached tray to transport}