-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 142
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add in DLPNO-CCSD(T)/def2-tzvp//wb97xd/def2tzvp model chemistry into the reference database #404
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Additions made possible by the code add to RMG-Py here, but the two PRs can be merged independently |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Some discussion needed. Also related to ReactionMechanismGenerator/RMG-Py#1935.
@@ -5,6 +5,40 @@ adjacency_list: | | |||
3 H u0 p0 c0 {1,S} | |||
4 H u0 p0 c0 {2,S} | |||
calculated_data: | |||
dlpno-ccsd(t)/def2-tzvp//wb97xd/def2tzvp: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I suggest we establish consistent naming conventions everywhere and use notation including hyphens, i.e., dlpno-ccsd(t)/def2-tzvp//wb97x-d/def2-tzvp
. I also note this in ReactionMechanismGenerator/RMG-Py#1935.
@@ -73,6 +73,40 @@ calculated_data: | |||
- N | |||
- N | |||
- H | |||
wb97xd/def2tzvp: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Same comment here. wb97x-d/def2-tzvp
.
Based on our discussion today, does this data include anions? |
d7898e5
to
290f754
Compare
Thanks to @dranasinghe for the calculations!!
This PR also fixes some issues with existing species in the reference species database